I have to do this as a discussion as my original ‘question post’ had to be approved, on the thread
Why Atmospheric Beam Ships Use Landing Legs When Down On The Surface Of Earth
- Posted by Drekx Omega on July 29, 2011 at 9:00am Read more: http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/profiles/blogs/why-atmospheric-beam-ships-use?xg_source=activity&id=2859786%3ABlogPost%3A950544&page=1#comments#ixzz2ShkJC8E6 Follow us: AshtarCommandCrew on Facebook
And clearly it was not accepted, I had hoped that this kind of ‘censorship’ was a thing of the past….
That there is nothing within this message that could be misunderstood or misconstrued neither was it derogative or discourteous in any way.
So the question must be asked WHY??? and what is the reasoning???
Drekx with reference to your following statement:
*** To put it simply, this curved hull allows an even flow of ionsized plasma across the surface, from the beam emitter at the top, which emits positrons (positive electrons) down to the implosion reactor motors at the bottom, which absorb the electrons.....which are made negatively charged...
A smooth rounded hull allows for a more effective and even flow of electrons from the north to south poles....In the centre of all such ships, there is a dipole conductor which extends through the centre and joins the beam emitter to the motors..
This basic design uses aetheric energies to firstly activate the field, once off ground and not grounded....then with the field in proper flow, an electro-gravitic "bubble" is created around the ship, so that it may utilise it's own gravitational field....much as a "mini-planet"....and electro-magnetic and gravitaional pull of it's own...which is direcional...and gravity is directed, pulling space-time, or folding space-time, in such a manner as to travel from point A to point B, by gravitically folding the spacial distance...
All atmospheric beam ships are designed to work in 3rd density, and can change densities when required....so transit inter-dimensionally, from the lowest three aethers of solid, liquid and gas...to the higher and finer states of the aetheric, plasma and even higher....BUT, these ships allow a PHYSICAL deployment when needed....and that is their role in the First Contact programme...**
This is effectively what you are implying:
The shielding concept of a dipole-like magnetic field and plasma, surrounding a spacecraft forming a “mini magnetosphere” the determined effectiveness of a magnetized plasma barrier to be able to expel an impacting, low beta, supersonic flowing energetic plasma representing the ‘aetheric energies’ . Optical and ionised plasma, plasma density, the plasma flow velocity, and the intensity of the dipole field show the creation of a narrow transport barrier region and diamagnetic cavity virtually devoid of energetic plasma particles. This demonstrates the potential viability of being able to create a small “hole” in the (‘aetheric energies’ ) plasma, of the order of the ion width, in which an inhabited spacecraft could reside in relative safety.
The interaction of flowing plasma with a dipole magnetic field: measuremental, diamagnetic cavity relevant to spacecraft protection. It is quantitatively, compared to a 3D particle-in-cell ‘hybrid’ code stimulation, which uses kinetic ions and fluid electrons, showing excellent quantitative agreement. Together, demonstrate the pivotal role of particle kinetics in determining generic plasma transport barriers.
A major issue and safety standpoint for bio-manned spacecraft is of greatest concern are the energetic heavy particles of which ~90% are protons, 9% are alphas, with electrons making up the majority of the remaining mass. Low-Earth-Orbit at approximately 300km altitude, this close to the Earth the atmosphere is still significantly dense, the potentially lethal damage to biological tissue from exposure to radiation in space arising, for example, from the ‘ ionised wind’ or ‘aetheric energies’ plasma. The ‘ionised wind’ consists of plasma characterised by low densities, moderate temperatures and fast/supersonic directed flows; the actual plasma wind output is highly variable on time scales of milliseconds upwards due to the localised and turbulent origins of the energetic plasma from the surface area, the magnetic field is carried with the out flowing plasma thus attenuate much of the particle flux.
There is the additional protection created by the ‘inner magnetosphere’. This is the magnetised plasma structure created as a consequence of the magnetic dipole field as it extends out. Since there is an need for the viability of creating artificial magnetosphere structures to provide local protection of spacecraft instrumentation and ‘astronauts’ but these require an impractically large power supply and assemblies to create the necessary field strengths.
Essentially single particles approaches the necessary magnitude of the protecting field rather than considering collective plasma effects that might be expected to dominate on 3-d hybrid modelling of the plasma-dipole field interaction suggests that more modest field strengths indeed are more effective at creating diamagnetic-like cavities (regions in which energetic ionised particles are essentially absent) that have the potential for spacecraft shielding.
A magnetised flowing plasma beam is incident upon a dipole magnetic field structure, seeking to simulate such field structures on incident ‘ionised wind’ particles, which outlines the mechanics of the apparatus, spatially resolved measurements of the principal plasma parameters from the dHybrid kinetic stimulation used on spacecraft protection systems. Analogues to the ionised plasma wind, spacecraft interaction system are of relevance to the plasmas, similar to those using ‘mini-magnetosphere’ like structures as a means of aiding spacecraft propulsion.
The ‘Light’ plasma confinement device, a modified version used for plasma–neutral interactions and relevant diverters. The plasma in this system consists of a supersonic plasma beam including the dipole magnetic field source and the location with peak densities and temperatures in the range 1017-1019 and 5-7eV respectively the principal components of the device configured for the temperature range.
The ‘vacuum vessel’, constructed of non-magnetic, is cylindrical with length and of diameter in respect of the device and is pumped by diffusion pumps that are isolated by gate ‘valves’ and located at each end of the device. The field ‘coils’ and is connected in series with a single return conductor to cancel the error field, that is the maximum field at the centre of the ‘machine’, this light field’ represents the ‘mini interplanetary’ magnetic field. The ‘ vacuum vessel’ is divided by a diaphragm containing a small orifice (14mm diameter) to separate off the “target chamber” in which an increased pressure, corresponding to neutral densities can be maintained, enhancing visible ‘light’ emission and enabling better use of fast or incremental ‘power’. The plasma source is a development of a modified “duo-plasma” source.
Two dipole field sources are used, a permanent, cylindrical magnet (with a strong field strength at the pole) mounted on a probe manipulator which allowed it to be moved to various axial positions along the target chamber. The second magnet source is a pulsed system formed from a 20 turn solenoid with a maximum current, mounted on reciprocating probe holders so as to minimise the deleterious effects of probe heating by the plasma beam, allow the acquisition of radial profiles (with a spatial resolution) of electron density and temperature at various positions within the target and upstream chambers. As it is obtained in a few tens of seconds, over which time any variation in plasma source output is minimised. By a combination of the radial scanning of the probe system and moving the axial position of the dipole field source, it is possible to obtain plasma parameters around the plasma- dipole field interaction region. The ‘visible light’ of the plasma beam interacting with the permanent dipole magnet and visible light emission (predominantly originates from interaction of the plasma with the background neutrality) corresponds to regions of higher plasma density, and the plasma beam is deflected in an apparently stable narrow layer around the magnet casing. This source produces a dipole field structure but at significantly stronger field strengths allowed the dynamics of the interaction to be utilised.
Upstream plasma beam characteristics, the interaction of the plasma beam with the static dipole field. (i.e. in a region sufficiently distant from the region in which the dipole field dominates) electron density and temperature respectively. In the absence of the downstream dipole field structure, it would be expected that this plasma would propagate along the solenoidal confining field until it encountered the end target chamber, with no reductions in the peak density or temperature occurring over the characteristic axial scale lengths or beam width, remaining constant along the whole length of the target chamber
Typically the plasmas produced are supersonic and in the absence of any direct ion energy, this ‘directly’ flows from the relative magnitudes of the floating and plasma potentials. Defining the sheath coefficient in the usual way, in terms of the ‘floating potential’ and a ‘plasma expression’ are due to plasma with an isotropic velocity distribution, subsonic ion flow and no secondary emission.
Also…. Please clarify this following statement as this is not correct.
***with the field in proper flow, an electro-gravitic "bubble" is created around the ship, so that it may utilise it's own gravitational field....much as a "mini-planet"....and electro-magnetic and gravitaional pull of it's own...which is direcional...and gravity is directed, pulling space-time, or folding space-time, in such a manner as to travel from point A to point B, by gravitically folding the spacial distance...***
Thanks.
Replies
If any of the readers would like to know the technical source document, from which Ms "Light Being" plagarises her wording...I'll provide a link:
Note that it was written by R. Bamford, who should take all the credit...albeit, at no stage does Ms "Light Being" mention the name, or link to the papers...
http://www.minimagnetosphere.org/downloads/pdfs/1Bamford.pdf
In contrast, all of my wording is my own...and if you try to discover a source other than me, you won't....So answering questions and discussing this matter with Bamford would be far more agreeable, than discussing this matter with a fraudulent blogging airhead, called "Light Being."
The Information that was presented in this instance Drekx, was the scientific break down of what you were actually implying in the description that you originally presented. I found it, and as I have a good scientific mind, understood that ‘relevant’ information, and presented to others, knowledge that was available to anyone who cared to look it up, I did not say any more than that, except for asking you to clarify a small part of your information, as it was not correct. You said that your information was your own words this is indeed so, from perhaps the same source?
**This is merely a personal thought form..!"**
You obviously misunderstood the heading, this was not my personal thought form, it says “merely a personal thought form” which was in the context of Rev Joshus's blog, actual post content, that his accusations and comments were coming from his own personal thoughts, the comment that I presented was in context, the wisdom that was existing within this statement was actually perfect and suited the discussion.
Reframe from the name calling Drekx, using such to inflate your own petty ego, as it says more about you than me.
Oh…. for goodness sake Drekx grow up and get over it….. …move on.
Like I said before, this is all I ‘am going to say on this matter, it is not worth my time nor my energy, so keep your negative energy to yourself, you have obviously have more use for it than I.
Ms "Light Being,"
You had also signed both narratives at the bottom, as if they were your own...Moreover, at no stage did you place links to the original sources of each, one being the words of Master DK and the technical data, from a paper written by R. Bamford....When Krishna congratulated you on a wise summary, you did not correct him, by saying it was written by someone else...And likewise, when Stick fell for the wisdom article you were claiming as yours, I was unearthing who's genuine wisdom was being presented...Master DK's...
Try as you may, this website has seen you for the liar, deceiver and plagarist that you obviously are...
I hope you learn some humility from being revealed to the light of day, by my investigations...And if you had not attempted to blacken my name, none of this would have happened to you and you would still be fooling other members here...
I believe it to be worth exposing, when members plagarise works for their own self promotion, as you so ruthlessly do...
Drekx….I did not attempt to blacken your name at all. Where have you pulled that notion from?
What is the point of that…it serves no purpose;
The information was the same as what you implied only more technical, I simply understood the science around it and the basis of your info and presented it, I only asked for one small part of your info to be clarified.
How is that ‘blackening your name’?
You went off on one, citing a ‘witch hunt’….instead of answering it. I can hardly be held responsible for that.
“for their own self promotion,...” no sorry, not interested in this at all.
And I do have quite a lot of humility for truths, wisdom, wise words and teachings.
Darryl, someone got banned for making a spoof and being funny? Are you telling me people are getting banned for being themselves? If that's so, I find those actions to be highly contradicting for the type of views and philosophies this website advertises to be aligned with. Whatever happened to "sharing is caring"? =/
---
Drekx is a mod? Why isn't there an icon or banner on his avatar that states this? Would be nice to know who the mods are so if one gets into a situation on this forum, they know who to seek for help.
---
Tiama, your agenda is showing. Usually those claiming someone has an agenda is actually the one with the agenda. It's a good deflecting mechanism. The ones who have something to hide are the ones who hide behind pretty pictures, quotes, and pretty much anything they copy and pasted instead of contributing something from their own personal "external self". And when I say "external self"... it's like... when an artist paints a picture... that picture is now a part of his "external self"... like, "here, have a piece of my external self".... when people share their original thoughts... attacking them for doing so is setting a bad example for all the other people who are on the fence about whether they're comfortable and feel safe enough to share their own original thoughts. So barking "agenda! agenda! agenda!" at these people is not a classy move. You (and others) are making people feel unsafe about expressing themselves.
---
LB... this is what I see from my side of the fence... you wrote a big post with lots of big words (I'm not interested in the subject matter but I did try my best to at least pay attention to what you're trying to achieve here). The statements Drekx and his friends are saying about what you wrote, sound paranoid (surprise surprise). They're so paranoid that people are out to get them... man, this is a good example of how you can see that spirits guides are not real. And if they were, they're just as dumb as the rest of us and can't teleport or telepathize to spy on others... because if they could, they'd be able to give their "host" appropriate information so they wouldn't sit in their houses, paranoid that some stranger on the internet who's asking them questions, is trying to "bring them down" or "make them look bad" (in my experience, people are doing a good job at making themselves look bad without the aid of others, lol).
It makes my heart sad to see people this way. In all religions you see people clinging so desperately to their beliefs. LB, they've (that clique) already judged you (and most on your friend's list) and placed you into one of their not-so-nice categories of their classification system (and will probably sadly maintain this judgment on you for the remainder of your contributions on this website--but persevere!). Despite your post being totally on topic... the people who are ignoring you (and talking about you behind your back instead of TO YOU like responsible adults do), and the friends of theirs that are attacking you... think you mean unwell to them. I guess you questioning them feels like a threat to them. If they were really confident in the subject matter, they wouldn't feel threatened. They'd be interested and happy to engage in the conversation with you. I could tell you why I think they're not confident in engaging with you about the subject matter but I'll keep my opinion about that out of it.
Good luck to you.
leffotrak - "I guess you questioning them feels like a threat to them. If they were really confident in the subject matter, they wouldn't feel threatened. THEY'D BE INTERESTED AND HAPPY TO ENGAGE IN THE CONVERSATION WITH YOU."
Yep! Thanks, leffotrak! That's about sums it up!
With reference to further comments made in this thread….
So drekx.....Posted by Tiamacious on May 9, 2013 at 3:39pm in Spirituality In General Read more: http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/forum/topics/so-drekx-1?xg_source=...
Follow us: AshtarCommandCrew on Facebook
It was a question Drekx and I was ACTUALLY AGREEING WITH YOU, just asked if you could clarify one small part.
Then suddenly it became a farcicality of a circus, an absurdity that simply required no more than a correction of a small paragraph….
“Surely you can rise above this..?? I had already moved on”. Yeah we noticed….not…then you say this comment and a few others, that’s really moving on???…..
“But when someone is the subject of a witchhunt”,
“WITCHUNT? Ahahahahaha sirian warrior brother you r too funny!!!!!!!!!!”
YEP too funny, tiamacious.... so where was this witch hunt again???
“Yes, that was with reference to "Light Being's" discussion, which was a poisoned chalice..”
“as I have too many enemies who seek my downfall on ACC”.
Now we are being rather silly, taking things out of proportion and creating friction and hurt in your own soul, do not blame others, this is a creation of your own ego. Perhaps it is time to stop perceiving them, address the motives and reasons why this occurs and soon the conflict that resides in the heart and soul will find peace.
I am not your enemy as I hold neither malice nor contempt for you Drekx.
Tiamacious
“It is obvious your information came from another source other than you..” really!!! Enlighten me!!!
“ Your intent I'm sure, was to make drek look like a fool.”
<<< the information was AGREEING WITH HIM but more technical >>> what part of this is eluding you FOR GOODNESS SAKE???
***************************
In the name of truth….Tiamacious
Embodiment incarnation of vow oath defined by symphony propagation of vibrations within esoteric ether and harmonious undulations of sonorous waves midst immense increments of frequency depictive polarity symmetry, manifesting as attuned inert paradox matrix essence of true nature stimulates accumulation as aria union, ultimate quintessence alignment of vow oath becomes butterfly dance within prism wave allegiance
^ such is the velocity of vow oath allegiance and irrevocable truths ^
Generalizing identification yet it seems advisable to emphasize that technical terminology has its own laws and is not subject to the jurisdiction of linguists < the melody essence within vibratory prism spectrum remains the same >.
In the name of truth.
Joseph, Interesting….I will have to look up this up…thanks.
@ Tiamacious, Drekx is a big boy now and I don’t think he need a young man to hold his hand. Ooops maybe he does, just seen what he’s has said.
Hidden Agenda ???
“.. But it seems their true agenda was to make drek look like a fool. Drek is no fool”
Good god Tiamacious, thats not nice calling someone a fool, how could I make him look like a fool, I was agreeing with him, for goodness sake, I just put it into scientific technical terms, what part of this is not being understood.
“But when someone is the subject of a witchhunt, we know who are REAL friends are, as we also know those who wish us ill, too.....”
A witch hunt Drekx??? what and where is the witch hunt??? you are making something out of nothing, how on earth are you coming to this conclusion.
All this nonsense just because I dared to ask Drekx to clarify and correct some small part of his information….oh dear… He should not have had any difficulty in doing this.
This is what is mystifying.
Well no matter it has not compromised my sincerity, honesty and integrity of my thoughts or actions.
In the name of truth.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next