Jay Dyer: Jeffrey Epstein Is The REAL Illuminati
Occult researcher Jay Dyer (…
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
Jay Dyer: Jeffrey Epstein Is The REAL Illuminati
Occult researcher Jay Dyer (…
CHAPTER XXV
RETURN AND RECURRENCE
A man is what his life is. If a man does not change anything…
Love Note From Archangel Michael Through Melanie Beckler Happy Valentines Day! On this day dedicated to the frequency of the heart, Archangel Michael has a message for you: "Through holding the field of LOVE, you are placing a vote within the…
Read more…We Make Our Own World By Josephine Edge Our world is of our own making. We are the director, and the actor in the play that you wrote before reincarnation. And you are adjusting to that play as you grow in divine love and strength. When you direct…
Read more…Cord Cutting Prayer Invocation By Steven Hutchinson A powerful cord-cutting mantra for when you’re ready to release with love everything that no longer serves your spiritual growth.“With God's Great Compassionate Light, we bring through the Violet…
Read more…Reiki for Clearing & Protection From All Mind Control The intention of this reiki session is to clear and remove any and all mindcontrol energies and constructs that you may be exposed to, as well as to clear and protect you from any manipulative…
Read more…Violet Flame Energy Clearing with Archangel Zadkiel By Melanie Beckler The world around us seems to be growing louder and more polarized.It can feel as though the collective noise is rising to a deafening level.Remember that you are not meant to…
Read more…
Comments
Of course if an ancient man, who coined 'chi', hears a claim that chi is a 'quantum coherent biofield', he won't say 'wow! That is physical'! The 'physicality' misnomer was not yet existent in those days. Neither was 'science' seemed to oppose such views in those days. So there was no need for the answer 'science cannot explain this' as a way to wade off a sceptic trying to use 'science' to undermine chi. So the one who conceived 'chi' could not have meant 'what no scientist will ever discover no matter what, no matter what time in future'. This definition will not be wise! 'Science' and 'scientific method', stance and paradigm changes from time to time. We should avoid such definitions as 'not explicable by science' etc
BTW coherent biophotons are natural lasers!
It is a tragic error to think that by saying 'physical', physicist has observed a thing about the entity and, in an objective manner, note that it has a certain property. The concept 'physical' is not like 'density'. We cannot observe anything common between a stone and a 'field' so it warrants the same label, 'physical', apart from the two being capable of affecting the visible things. In other words, we know not much about 'field', and calling it 'physical' does not help us understand anything more about it, than, for instance, we had called it 'siritual'.
-
1722
-
1723
-
1724
-
1725
-
1726
of 1789 Next