Comments

• 

  Papa Fred April 2, 2021 at 6:46pm

  

  If you were told you are "The Most Trusted One" - what would that mean to you ..?
• 

  Lee April 2, 2021 at 1:11pm

  

  Venus cannot possibly sustain human life. The interior of Venus is made of a metallic iron core that's roughly 2,400 miles (6,000 km) wide. Venus' molten rocky mantle is roughly 1,200 miles (3,000 km) thick. Venus' crust is mostly basalt, and is estimated to be 6 to 12 miles (10 to 20 km) thick, on average. Venus is the hottest planet in the solar system. As for Mars, someone has read or watched THE MARTIAN CHRONICLES too much. Great idea brought into great entertainment by Ray Bradbury, an excellent writer. Rent the movie. It stars Rock Hudson. Makes the idea look feasible, but how does the planet keep the atmosphere for life enclosed so the atmosphere from the deadly outer surface not intrude?
• 

  AlternateEarth April 2, 2021 at 1:00pm

  https://www.brighteon.com/2ddf68f7-c5ce-4f6c-a901-f4a53a8435b5

  

  Situation Update, April 1st, 2021 - China creating "Planet of the Apes" hybrid army to CONQUER the…

  Today's sponsor is the Satellite Phone Store: http://www.MetalsWithMike.com For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport Natu…
• 

  AlternateEarth April 2, 2021 at 12:55pm

  https://www.infowars.com/posts/biden-infrastructure-bill-includes-2...

  

  Biden Infrastructure Bill Includes $20 BILLION To DESTROY Highways For Being Racist

  Administration claims "long-standing and persistent racial injustice" in infrastructure
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 2, 2021 at 5:59am

  

  If an ancient man wrote about a ball lightning, he may simply say that he saw a glowing ball that passes through walls and seems intelligent and even can chase people etc. He will report what looks like 'miracle', but of course he wont say 'beyond science' as in 'modern science' because he has no clue of such science. If, in modern times, we develope a belief that what he saw was 'non-physical', we will have driven a wedge between modern science and what this guy experienced, something that he did not intended! We will impose a modern dilemma to a time when no such a dilemma was there! We will never understand what this guy was talking of! Then we will never understand that he was doing science, not trying to create a 'religion'! Finaly we may not even discover ball lightnings!
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 2, 2021 at 5:38am

  

  It is important not to see 'spirit' /'spirituality' as something totaly different from what we (perhaps incongruously) term it 'physical'. This view needlessly impedes a 'spirituality inspired' science research!
  
  Of course if an ancient man, who coined 'chi', hears a claim that chi is a 'quantum coherent biofield', he won't say 'wow! That is physical'! The 'physicality' misnomer was not yet existent in those days. Neither was 'science' seemed to oppose such views in those days. So there was no need for the answer 'science cannot explain this' as a way to wade off a sceptic trying to use 'science' to undermine chi. So the one who conceived 'chi' could not have meant 'what no scientist will ever discover no matter what, no matter what time in future'. This definition will not be wise! 'Science' and 'scientific method', stance and paradigm changes from time to time. We should avoid such definitions as 'not explicable by science' etc
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 2, 2021 at 5:25am

  Coherent biophotons can explain reiki! When cells are healthy they emit coherent photons of a certain freauency. When it is unhealthy, this signal alters. So the 'bio-field' around healthy cells is different from the one of unhealthy one. Reiki will be explained by supposing that this photonic state is 'bicausal', just like the way electricity creats magnet and magnets can produce electricity.
  
  BTW coherent biophotons are natural lasers!
• 

  LokisLibrarian April 1, 2021 at 10:22pm

  There are phone apps that can measure electromagnetic fields and observe phenomena that takes place in higher frequencies/dimensions than humanity can currently openly observe. We'll get there!
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 1, 2021 at 6:56pm

  Please explain how you think they survive in these conditions.
• 

  Roaring Lovely April 1, 2021 at 10:01am

  

  Whenever a physicist say 'physical', he is often contrasting it with 'mathematical'. Thus energy is 'physical' but a lagrangian, coordinate system, equation, etc are non-physical. The 'non-physical' has no effect in the world!
  
  It is a tragic error to think that by saying 'physical', physicist has observed a thing about the entity and, in an objective manner, note that it has a certain property. The concept 'physical' is not like 'density'. We cannot observe anything common between a stone and a 'field' so it warrants the same label, 'physical', apart from the two being capable of affecting the visible things. In other words, we know not much about 'field', and calling it 'physical' does not help us understand anything more about it, than, for instance, we had called it 'siritual'.