At 14:16 -Buildings underwater near Japan!
Comment Wall
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
The word ''Sin'' denotes some error or Mistake that cannot be changed or will not be changed by the one making the error.It…
He's been flying at a low altitude over the same area for two weeks.
The Expansion Of Our Collective Inner Light By Anrita Melchizedek
The Expansion Of Our Collective Inner Light By Anrita Melchizedek Beloved hearts, this Solstice marks a profound evolutionary shift within the collective consciousness of humanity and for many an awakened Soul. We are witnessing the collapsing…
Read more…New Beginnings With Adi & Orin's Path Of Self Realization
New Beginnings With Adi & Orin's Path Of Self RealizationFree Online Event For Your Spiritual Growth & Ascension Tuesday, July 7- Saturday, July 11 - at 1 PM or 7 PM CDT Join Zoom…
Read more…The Similarities and Differences of Seeing and Witnessing
Sri Amma Bhagavan WisdomThe Similarities and Differences of Seeing and WitnessingDear Sri Bhagavan, During your last darshan, you told us that we would receive the state of seeing. Previously, you spoke about the state of witnessing. Are the two…
Read more…JULY 4th, 2026 – AMERICA’S 250th ANNIVERSARY * Patricia Cota-Robles
JULY 4th, 2026 – AMERICA’S 250th ANNIVERSARY * Patricia Cota-Robles It is a wondrous time. Great changes are taking place everywhere on Earth. In my mind’s eye, I see that the Earth is becoming a Planet of exquisite beauty and Harmony. Her…
Read more…Latest Activity
https://youtu.be/1ensQb6gtvU?is=J8TQZzYzwAH5lDfy"
Comments
Of course if an ancient man, who coined 'chi', hears a claim that chi is a 'quantum coherent biofield', he won't say 'wow! That is physical'! The 'physicality' misnomer was not yet existent in those days. Neither was 'science' seemed to oppose such views in those days. So there was no need for the answer 'science cannot explain this' as a way to wade off a sceptic trying to use 'science' to undermine chi. So the one who conceived 'chi' could not have meant 'what no scientist will ever discover no matter what, no matter what time in future'. This definition will not be wise! 'Science' and 'scientific method', stance and paradigm changes from time to time. We should avoid such definitions as 'not explicable by science' etc
BTW coherent biophotons are natural lasers!
It is a tragic error to think that by saying 'physical', physicist has observed a thing about the entity and, in an objective manner, note that it has a certain property. The concept 'physical' is not like 'density'. We cannot observe anything common between a stone and a 'field' so it warrants the same label, 'physical', apart from the two being capable of affecting the visible things. In other words, we know not much about 'field', and calling it 'physical' does not help us understand anything more about it, than, for instance, we had called it 'siritual'.
-
1884
-
1885
-
1886
-
1887
-
1888
of 1951 Next