DIDACTIC OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE
To justify or condemn is not to understand. Those who wish to overcome their flaws must neither justify nor condemn them. It is urgent to UNDERSTAND our…
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Comments are closed.
DIDACTIC OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE
To justify or condemn is not to understand. Those who wish to overcome their flaws must neither justify nor condemn them. It is urgent to UNDERSTAND our…
The Secret to Awakening! - Mooji What should we practice in order to awaken? What training leads to enlightenment? In this powerful teaching, Mooji reveals a truth that may surprise many seekers — awakening is not about complicated practices,…
Read more…Reiki for Anxiety: For the Soul Who Is Tired of Bracing A full Reiki healing transmission for anxiety and nervous system relief — clearing survival programming from the root and solar plexus and anchoring the living codes of safety, sufficiency, and…
Read more…Consciousness Upgrade Initiation - Week 1 - Solara An-Ra Please practice this for 7 days to receive the full initiation, before going onto the 2nd meditation. Dedicate these 3 weeks to you empowerment, expansion and original Blueprint…
Read more…Reiki Healing with Crystals for Clarity and Wisdom HI! I'm Danielle Stimpson of Learn Reiki Philadelphia. Whether you feel foggy about the facts, need help plotting your path forward or want to be open to more spiritual guidance in decision…
Read more…Claiming Oneness By Celestial White Beings Through Natalie Glasson Greetings, greetings, we are the Celestial White Beings. We come forth with our love and cosmic vibrations as many beings of white light, and yet we are one soul group, one source,…
Read more…One With The Infinite By Ann Albers & The Angels Hi All,Today, the angels take us on a little energetic journey of remembrance to help us connect with our true nature. Poetic, and peaceful, their message may help you resonate into a space of…
Read more…
Comments
Of course if an ancient man, who coined 'chi', hears a claim that chi is a 'quantum coherent biofield', he won't say 'wow! That is physical'! The 'physicality' misnomer was not yet existent in those days. Neither was 'science' seemed to oppose such views in those days. So there was no need for the answer 'science cannot explain this' as a way to wade off a sceptic trying to use 'science' to undermine chi. So the one who conceived 'chi' could not have meant 'what no scientist will ever discover no matter what, no matter what time in future'. This definition will not be wise! 'Science' and 'scientific method', stance and paradigm changes from time to time. We should avoid such definitions as 'not explicable by science' etc
BTW coherent biophotons are natural lasers!
It is a tragic error to think that by saying 'physical', physicist has observed a thing about the entity and, in an objective manner, note that it has a certain property. The concept 'physical' is not like 'density'. We cannot observe anything common between a stone and a 'field' so it warrants the same label, 'physical', apart from the two being capable of affecting the visible things. In other words, we know not much about 'field', and calling it 'physical' does not help us understand anything more about it, than, for instance, we had called it 'siritual'.
-
1764
-
1765
-
1766
-
1767
-
1768
of 1831 Next