You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
"OK.. my apologies to you Movella for mistaking your comment asking how I treated my clients, with your fathers comment, yet with all the comments flooding in at that time span and it was late at night I responded so I must have got It confused, with…"
"Control freaks- not their Archon gang so they are confusing things"
"I agree, no more posting of YouTube channel, "PCC- Space," as it's what one could describe as a feedback loop....They are watching what we say here and adding our ideas and data...then mixing it all up into a confused soup..
The latest offerings of…"
The latest offerings of…"
"No problem Andro!😊 We already know the actual information from here on AC anyway..
Like AE said, some of these fake channels might even be getting some ideas from us."
Like AE said, some of these fake channels might even be getting some ideas from us."
"This YouTube channel ‘PCC- Space’ is rubbish, it says that same disclaimer on all of the vids because they are all AI generated.. Sorry guys, I would advise you all to stop following that channel."
"I didn't see the disclaimer
Whoever it is must be watching this site because yesterday's vidvwas almost verbatim to Drexk's description etc of Atlas"
Whoever it is must be watching this site because yesterday's vidvwas almost verbatim to Drexk's description etc of Atlas"
Image Credit: banned.video…
Replies
But which came first? The message, or the events that back it up?
Couldn't channelers just model their message on anything going on in the world and have it sound true?
I want to believe. I will pendulum this a bit and see what I get...
*Mr. Pendulum, is this message a clear and accurate description of true events?*
...
The pendulum says no...
Also "This message" is not the greatest way to target the subject matter, unless you can clearly and steadily hold the content in your conscious mind at the point of asking. Lets remember, its a channelled message.....so it goes through the channeller's consciousness and always picks up a slant, or stuff that is not quite accurate. One small discrepancy could have resulted in the 'no' swing. Maybe a series of questions on different parts of the message? and some averages?
Unless you're someone like Bashar who can link with his future self very tightly and let that future consciousness occupy his current body and deliver information and interact with us, there is always room for error of some sort.
Applied Kinesiology (muscle twitch technique) would be a better litmus test :)