You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
☀️ Great Central Sun Activation: Receive Your Divine Blueprint Download! ☀️ With Melanie Beckler Blessings,Following up on our recent Full Moon transmission, the Council of Light steps forward to help you ground and integrate the immense…
Sing & Meditate With The Whales & The 1st Codes Of Gaia Welcome to the 2026 Summer Solstice Sing to the Whales Quantum Choir event. This transmission comes from one of the most heart-filled sacred places we have ever experienced—Sylvan Lake in…
"Thank you for understanding what I'm saying on at least a few key levels. I appreciate yours as well, and have taken many things you've said to me to heart.
I have a great appreciation for analytical (anchored) and free-flowing (anchorless)…"
I have a great appreciation for analytical (anchored) and free-flowing (anchorless)…"
Posted on 06/28/2026 by EraOfLightBeloved Beautiful Souls, Blue Ray Starseeds, Lightworkers, Empaths, Angels and Angelics,The Blue Rays and Starseeds are spiritually awakened, connected to Source, aware of higher dimensions, and have lifted much…
"Sirian, I appreciate the analytical effort. However, the logical mind can only take us so far and self-realisation is achieved inwardly, not through debate. You decide your own path and will align with ascension if you choose to. Most will…"
Replies
But which came first? The message, or the events that back it up?
Couldn't channelers just model their message on anything going on in the world and have it sound true?
I want to believe. I will pendulum this a bit and see what I get...
*Mr. Pendulum, is this message a clear and accurate description of true events?*
...
The pendulum says no...
Also "This message" is not the greatest way to target the subject matter, unless you can clearly and steadily hold the content in your conscious mind at the point of asking. Lets remember, its a channelled message.....so it goes through the channeller's consciousness and always picks up a slant, or stuff that is not quite accurate. One small discrepancy could have resulted in the 'no' swing. Maybe a series of questions on different parts of the message? and some averages?
Unless you're someone like Bashar who can link with his future self very tightly and let that future consciousness occupy his current body and deliver information and interact with us, there is always room for error of some sort.
Applied Kinesiology (muscle twitch technique) would be a better litmus test :)