So he thinks ..he must be crazy as it's not a question of think but basic common sense that bender genders must not be allowed in natural mens and womens sports but must have their own classes of sports like born man turned woman sport and the other born woman turned man another sport.
why did it take a PM to realise this after so long???
IT SHOULD NEVER NEVER HAVE BEEN ALLOWED IN THE FIRST PLACE AND IF YOU GO BACK TO MY FORUM POSTS I HAVE CLEARLY STATED THIS A LONG TIME AGO.
We also need to target FIXED MATCHES very very strictly as quiet a few sports are fixed for financial gains by some
Replies
In many western nations, sports bodies and authorities, have become wokeness advocates....This tripe needs to be stamped out...Whether it's footballers kneeling to George Floyd, or trans-men, taking gold medals, in female sports...Enough is enough...!!
I think the best example is this very same COVID thing. Some pple think it is unfair for the government not to impose lockdowns or such. They saw 'we have a right to be protected against the virus'. But I would say it is your responsibility to lock yourself up, if you are worried about viruses. It is not the for the one braving the virus to lock themselves up. My reasoning is consistent and I apply it to sports. Governments should not be involved in our health, even at the guise of 'protecting us from viruses'. Similarly they should not be involved in our entertainments and leisures even at the guise of 'creating fairness in sports'.
The reduction of the fans watching sports is the best thing for true capitalism. It allows the free market to select the kind of leisure activities that is best for pple.
The crucial question you seem not to be asking yourself is: who do you want to act as a judge to settle what match is fixed or is not? This approach brings into more play another third party, that requires more common thrust as an important determiner in games outcome! But we know what happens whenever a third thrusted party is required. This is the reason why Satoshi Nakamoto introduced blockchain. We should be moving away from such, and if such unserious events as games cannot help us learn how to get rid of central authorities, nothing will ever do it!
Look at you! Having just complained that people of the Boris Johnson types should not dictate whether or not one should get vaccinated, you now turn around and say the same Johnny should dictate who should play who in a game? Is this the way it is done in a 'free' world? Of course not! Whether or not a heavyweight male fighter should fight with a certain featherweight woman is up to them to decide and upto the fans to decide whether or not the want to spectate such a match! Boris Johnson and the like should not decide on such! Until pple speak consistently as to whether they want authoritarianism or freedom, the latter will never come to this world!
And this is how games should be done! You chose who to play with, what referee you want and the fans chooses whether or not to attend the match. There is no room for the government to impose any rules! It must be something done by the people and for the people!
He then suffers outrage from his backbenchers....The problem with weak leaders, is that they often let evil slide into the mainstream of culture...
I don't know why you don't understand that games are games, not serious businesses. Let me see if this can help you: when we were young, in schools, playing football was a damn fun! We just went to the field begun by forming a long line. Then someone comes along and sequentially push us 'go left, go right, go left, go right,....', voila! We now have two teams! The game begines! Rules are part of the fun. They don't DEFINE the fun! When the other members 'cheat', you can do a couple of things in response. You kick the ball upwards, northwards or even now score your own goal. And so 'cheating' was part of the fun!
Then came the teacher! He spoils the great moment! He want strict rules. The fun of the game is not important to him. All he want is to know 'who is winning' or 'who is better than who' in playing. But we knew this is nonsense! This is an adult pervert with unhealthy combination of udult 'seriousness' with childish games. We could have as well lengthened the field twice, increase the goal post height, half the field, increase players from 22 to 50 etc, and we would have produced a completely new set of 'the best players', e.g. those more good in marathon than in sprints. So 'who is good at the game' is not the important thing simply because the game is an arbitrary choice amongst countless events that we could have chosen to do. We should not be into games with 'finding the winner' as what is at the uppermost in our minds. With that 'strictness' is not necessary!!