Breaking News : Jesus Did Not Exist ...Romans Invented Jesus Christ ...HIGHLY RECOMMEND

ABOUT

Based on the best-selling religious studies book by Joseph Atwill, this documentary shows that Jesus is not a historical figure, the events of Jesus’ life were based on a Roman military campaign, his supposed second coming refers to an event that already occurred, and the Gospels were written by a family of Caesars who left us documents to prove it.

Watch on Amazon Prime Video!

Advertisement free viewing.

Watch the film on YouTube!

Caesar’s Messiah documentary produced by NLightning artZ (workZ)

Now Watch This Video @

https://youtu.be/4UqG8w7ezUQ

Better beleive that Jesus did exist. The evidence of his existence is as good as the evedence of Alexander The Great, Aristotle etc. Of course it is possible that these other figures were fabrications too, but it is not plausible.

It is wrong to think that bible is a single book. Yes, bible nowadays looks like a single book but actually it is several books sewed together. It was never a single book at the start, or should I say there was no bible. So those people who say 'show me other historical reference of Jesus other than the bible' are merely moving the goal post, naively thinking that bible is a single book. So as far as attesting to simple things like if a figure like Pilate, Paul or John The Baptist existed, the bible is quite reliable and we don't need another book to confirm. However, the accuracy of the detailed story around these figures is an entirely different issue. Here we have no reason to trust the bible. Did Jesus actually die on the cross? Was he born by a virgin? Was he a pacifist, all righteous and humble? Was he realy a son of God? These are the things we should question, not his existence. It is just like we can question whether JFK was realy killed via illuminist conspirators but we cannot question his existence.

The idea that a whole history can be fabricated and slipped into real history is far fetched. It requires a day when everybody was asleep and henceforth suffered frim amnesia! What if someone tries to say that there was another president of USA termed Santa after Washington? What will it happen? The answer is that though he may convince some few people, he will never fool everybody. So beginning right at that time, there will always be people who will oppose the idea of existence of Santa. However, in the case of Jesus, no historian, Roman, Jew or Greek questioned his existence. Infact no one ever questions this except, the modern man who is light years distant from the events, and his mind is hell bent on contradicting traditional religion than getting history correctly.

However, a detailed story like 'resurrection' can indead be slipped in bit by bit. Consequently, we see a rejection of it right at the beginning. Even the bible never tells us that everybody believed that Jesus indead resurrected. However, it hardly needs to speak as if some people did not believe that Jesus did not exist at all. So that resurrection story was an exaggeration by Christians is plausible. We tell this by noting that unlike Jesus's existence, it did not 'fool' everyone!

Unlike resurrection story, we see non-Christians and even enemies of christians, like Tacitus attests the existence of Jesus. Of course Tasitus believed that the detailed story around Jesus was a superstitious fabrication by Christians, but he believed that Jesus indead existed. This is significant because Tacitus leaved just 40 years or so after the alleged events. If Jesus did not exist, Tacitus will be like someone believing that an unknown US president existed in as resent as1980s!! What rationalization will you give for absence of knowledge of him? To make matters worse, the people who were eye witnesses are still alife!

"Meanwhile-the 'white guy' may be a deep state patsy -only a month ago the alt media(now the real news media) was floating an article that the pipe bomber was a female Capitol policewoman-supposedly from leaked FBI information
Grok Says Photos Of…"

We are the Creators. We are a twelfth-dimensional collective of non-physical beings, and we are here to help.We seek to energize you, to inform you, to enlighten you, and to empower you. We know that you have everything that you need inside of you,…

"They're all crazy;
“Instinctually Programmed To Lie”: CNN’s Jake Tapper Mislabels D.C. Pipe-Bomb Suspect As “White Man”
https://www.infowars.com/posts/instinctually-programmed-to-lie-cnns..."

Replies

Roaring Lovely February 8, 2021 at 5:27am

Jesus's second comming did not happen. But it was supposed to happen in ancient times, around 40 or so years after the death of Jesus. It is ridiculous that Christians believe that the book of revelation foretells future events or is projected all the way to modern times. Read this way, it is impossible to understand revelation! However we don't see any evidence that the writer of revelation saw the modern world! For instance, his warfare only saw bows, spears, horses chariots, swords etc. No hint is given on tankers, jets, bombs etc. Clearly, the writer of revelation thought that the world will end at around his own time. He thought that Jesus will come and overthrow Roman Empire.
Roaring Lovely February 8, 2021 at 4:38am

Better beleive that Jesus did exist. The evidence of his existence is as good as the evedence of Alexander The Great, Aristotle etc. Of course it is possible that these other figures were fabrications too, but it is not plausible.

It is wrong to think that bible is a single book. Yes, bible nowadays looks like a single book but actually it is several books sewed together. It was never a single book at the start, or should I say there was no bible. So those people who say 'show me other historical reference of Jesus other than the bible' are merely moving the goal post, naively thinking that bible is a single book. So as far as attesting to simple things like if a figure like Pilate, Paul or John The Baptist existed, the bible is quite reliable and we don't need another book to confirm. However, the accuracy of the detailed story around these figures is an entirely different issue. Here we have no reason to trust the bible. Did Jesus actually die on the cross? Was he born by a virgin? Was he a pacifist, all righteous and humble? Was he realy a son of God? These are the things we should question, not his existence. It is just like we can question whether JFK was realy killed via illuminist conspirators but we cannot question his existence.

The idea that a whole history can be fabricated and slipped into real history is far fetched. It requires a day when everybody was asleep and henceforth suffered frim amnesia! What if someone tries to say that there was another president of USA termed Santa after Washington? What will it happen? The answer is that though he may convince some few people, he will never fool everybody. So beginning right at that time, there will always be people who will oppose the idea of existence of Santa. However, in the case of Jesus, no historian, Roman, Jew or Greek questioned his existence. Infact no one ever questions this except, the modern man who is light years distant from the events, and his mind is hell bent on contradicting traditional religion than getting history correctly.

However, a detailed story like 'resurrection' can indead be slipped in bit by bit. Consequently, we see a rejection of it right at the beginning. Even the bible never tells us that everybody believed that Jesus indead resurrected. However, it hardly needs to speak as if some people did not believe that Jesus did not exist at all. So that resurrection story was an exaggeration by Christians is plausible. We tell this by noting that unlike Jesus's existence, it did not 'fool' everyone!

Unlike resurrection story, we see non-Christians and even enemies of christians, like Tacitus attests the existence of Jesus. Of course Tasitus believed that the detailed story around Jesus was a superstitious fabrication by Christians, but he believed that Jesus indead existed. This is significant because Tacitus leaved just 40 years or so after the alleged events. If Jesus did not exist, Tacitus will be like someone believing that an unknown US president existed in as resent as1980s!! What rationalization will you give for absence of knowledge of him? To make matters worse, the people who were eye witnesses are still alife!
- Krishna Kalki > Roaring Lovely February 8, 2021 at 4:51am
  
  Actually what got me to do this research is when the extraterrestrials Pleiadians stated that Jesus did not really exist
- Krishna Kalki > Roaring Lovely February 8, 2021 at 4:49am
  
  Watch this video @ https://youtu.be/4UqG8w7ezUQ
Krishna Kalki February 8, 2021 at 4:15am

Bang goes a lot of so called spiritual masters preaching wrong information on Jesus
Krishna Kalki February 8, 2021 at 4:13am

Bang goes a lot of so called sacred scriptures on Jesus ...Bang goes a lot of wrong information on Jesus...Bang goes his second coming as it's already past ..Bang BANG BANG ...NOW YOU NEED TO RESET YOUR LIFE BASED ON THIS FACTS THAT JESUS AFTER ALL DID NOT EXIST