Replies

• 

  Malcolm May 19, 2014 at 4:07pm

  Spiritual people do lose their cool, and usually for good reason. Jesus proved this with the way he greeted the money changers at the temple, which was a proper thing to do when one considers the root of all evil is the love for money. 
• 

  Malcolm May 19, 2014 at 3:15pm

  If Hillary didn't challenge the corruption, then she knew about such corruption, and did nothing about it. Hence, she is a part of what you call "the cabal," as well as "the corruption," and needs to be held accountable.   
• 

  Malcolm May 19, 2014 at 2:30pm

  G. Edward Griffin proved the Federal Reserve was a cabal with the text "The Creature From Jekyl Island." And Hillary Clinton supports the Federal Reserve as much as any mainstream Republican. Hence, there is no real difference between Coke (Republican Party) and Pepsi (Democrat Party), except maybe for abortion and gay rights.

  BOTH OF THESE MAINSTREAM PARTIES ARE PART OF THIS DEFINITION YOU CALL "cabal," AND EXCLUDING HILLARY FROM YOUR DEFINITION OF "cabal" PROVES YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IN REGARDS TO ANY "black ops," BECAUSE MORE THAN LIKELY SHE WAS A PART OF SUCH "black ops." Just go ask Vince Foster.

  Citation of documented proof is the best way to prove your point. Excluding Hillary from your "cabal" description makes your accusations laughable.

  

  

  
• 

  Marique May 19, 2014 at 6:00am

  You go Tom, lol....I totally agree that who every you dislike, you are going to be believing anything thing that supports that dislike....You have the right idea scrapping all the political stuff...I have too...that is why I don't comment on politics any more...A. because I don't know enough to hold an intelligent discussion about politics, other than both parties suck in their own ways, and B. because there are enough people around to keep the political stuff fueled in discussions till ad nauseum and C. because no one ever wins by being right because the politicians are all whores to someone or something, whether it be the special interest groups, the cabal, or the other creepy factors controlling the world....controlled by who is pulling the strings...it is all a sickening illusion game...and we always loose....
  • 

    Malcolm > Marique May 19, 2014 at 2:33pm

    Yeah, Tom you go. Around in circles and down the hole, because you're only going on your opinion and not facts.
• 

  Malcolm May 19, 2014 at 2:41am

  "WHERE'S THE BEEF???"  Without presented facts from a reliable and dedicated source, you are talking hearsay, opinion, and "conspiracy theory" (dearest).

  If Hillary Clinton was not responsible in any way as you claim, how come she resigned? And please don't say "she was forced to." Justice Department Head Eric Holder has more slime on his person than anyone in the "appointed czars" departments, and he's still refusing to step down despite it all.

  NOTE: I agree with you that Cheney is a whole ass (with more artificial organs than Robert Moog). But even a broken clock is correct two times a day.  
• 

  Malcolm May 19, 2014 at 1:51am

  Again Tom, you don't know what you're talking about. A U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee concluded in January 2014 that the U.S. State Department clearly could have prevented the mishaps in Benghazi, including the so called "black ops" of which you claim Secretary of State Hitlary knew nothing about. Here's the report:

   

  Benghazi attack: Senate report slams State Department, intelligence agencies

  In a new report, a Senate committee faults the State Department and US intelligence agencies for failure to prevent the 2012 terrorist attack on a US diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

  By Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer / January 15, 2014

  • 

  A Libyan man investigates the inside of the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, shortly after an attack that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on the assault Wednesday.

  Mohammad Hannon/AP/File

  WASHINGTON

  A scathing Senate Intelligence Committee report on the September 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, faults the State Department for not securing the diplomatic mission there against known terrorist threats and concludes the attacks that left four American personnel dead “were preventable.”

  
  

  The committee’s conclusions, issued Wednesday, broadly mirror those of earlier reports on the attacks that resulted in the deaths of US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. But the report offers new information that paints a disturbing picture of a lack of interagency coordination before the attacks and a bungling response in the 16 months since.
• 

  Malcolm May 19, 2014 at 1:10am

  You' don't know what you're talking about, Tom. The Libyan Consulate AND Ambassador Stevens sent inquiries about potential dangers directly to the State Department (not "the black ops" Department) long before Stevens was murdered and right before he was murdered. Hillary knew exactly what was going on in Libya. Here's the 2013 report from the Washington Times detailing what the reports said: