You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
"For those who don't know the Rothschilds are one of the main corrupt banking families in the Dark Cabal so this is something to keep an eye on. Wonder if we might start hearing more about the Rothschilds and the other corrupt banking families going…"
"Macron's days of being in charge are coming to an end soon. The people of France have had enough of their corrupt leaders just like the people in other countries across the globe. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/macrons-minority-coalition..."
"Violet eyes in humans is a completely new concept to me. I think I´ll give Claire violet eyes. This will make her extremely beautiful."
"Thank you Drekx Omega. Note that I avoid using the term ´non - humans´, when discussing UAP related topics as I have noticed you do too. One way to drop what we have conventionally learned and can explore in terms of de - learning, is the concept of…"
"You know Darth, one thing I like about your attitude to these esoteric topics, is a healthy willingness to learn...And indeed, in many instances, it requires us to drop what we have conventionally learned and willfully unlearn, to learn anew....And…"
"Hi Drekx. You have done a good breakdown of the Alien Scientist video. Note I have not watched it. It seems to me that space might not exist locally, to the extent that I can not provide you with sufficient proof that it does. This would mean that…"
Above picture is from youtube. A conclusion at the end is provided for the uninitiated. The best description of this relationship came from www.elle.com as follows: "When Freddie…
Above photo from Infowars. A basic conclusion for the uninitiated is provided. This analysis excludes use of the Moon, Ascendant, or Midheaven since we are using a mean time of 12:00 pm. This means the primary tool…
Covid-19 was the 34th TERRORIST ATTACK involving BIOLOGICAL AGENTS from 1970 to 2020, meant to create panic, mass casualties and economic disruption
11/24/2024 //…
Replies
Both!
Feel your boundaries and then identify where you have limitations. God has no limitations or boundaries but humans do. So if it is limited it is the will of man, if it is boundless it is the will of God.
They are intertwined. Remember that you have the illusion of seeing from your own perspective alone despite that your consciousness is seeing every perspective simultaneously. You are the air, you are the trees, you are the self and you are the others.
"We have spoken here of God in terms Person, and we have used therefore the pronouns, He and His. Must it therefore be inferred that we are dealing with a stupendous Personality which we call God, and do we therefore belong to that school of thought which we call the anthropomorphic? The Buddhist teaching recognises no God or Person. Is it, therefore, wrong from our point of view and approach, or is it right? Only an understanding of man as a divine expression is time and space, can reveal this mystery.
Both schools of thought are right, and in no way contradict each other. In their synthesis and in their blending, the truth as it really is can begin -- aye, dimly -- to appear. There is a God Transcendent Who "having pervaded the whole universe with a fragment of Himself" can still say : "I remain". There is a God Immanent, Whose Life is the source of the activity, intelligence, growth and attractiveness, of every form in all the kingdoms of nature. There is likewise in every human being a transcendent soul which, when the life cycle on earth has come and gone, and when the period of manifestation is over, becomes again the unmanifest and the formless, and which can also say: "I remain". In form, and when in manifestation, the only way in which the human mind and brain can express its recognition of the conditioning divine life, is to speak in terms of Person, of Individuality. Hence we speak of God as a Person, of His Will, His nature, and His form.
Behind the manifested universe, however, stands the formless One, That which is not an individual, being free from the limitations of individualised existence. Therefore the Buddhist is right when he emphasises the non-individualised nature of Deity, and refuses to personalise Divinity. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit of the Christian theology, embodying as they do the triplicities of all theologies, disappear also into the One, when the period of manifestation is over. They remain as One, with quality and life untouched and undifferentiated, as they are when in manifestation.
An analogy to this appears when a man dies. Then his three aspects -- mind or will, emotion or love, and physical appearance -- vanish. There is then no person. Yet, if one accepts the fact of immortality, the conscious being remains! His quality, and purpose, and life are united with his undying soul. The outer form with its differentiations into manifested trinity, has gone -- never again to return in exactly the same form or expression, in time or space.
The interplay of soul and mind, produces the manifested universe, with all that is therein. When that interplay is persisting, either in God or in man, we use (for how else can we speak with clarity?) terms of human origin, and therefore limiting, such is our present stage of enlightenment -- or should we say, unenlightenment? Thus the idea of individuality, of personality, and of form, is built up. When the interplay ceases, and manifestation ends, such terms are no longer suitable; they have no meaning. Yet the undying one, whether God or man, persists.
Thus in human thought, preserved for us by the great Teacher of the East, the Buddha, we have the concept of the transcendent Deity, divorced from the triplicities, the dualities, and the multiplicity of manifestation. There is but life, formless, freed from the individuality, unknown. In the teaching of the West, preserved for us and formulated for us by the Christ, the concept of God Immanent is preserved, -- God in us and in all forms. In the synthesis of the Eastern and Western teachings, and in the merging of these two great schools of thought, something of the superlative Whole can be sensed -- sensed merely -- not known." (Esoteric Psychology, Vol. II, p. 229/31)