Eclipse on 20th May was NOT the Moon!

So I will explain to the leymen here why this appears to be confusing for people. This is filled with so much ignorant assumptions no wonder people are imagining things.

The supermoon is an atmospheric effect NOT an indication that the moon is closest to the earth, so right off the bat the person made a gross error. Here is a site showing the apogee and perigees for the moon and the dates. The moon was actually closer to earth on May 6th than on May 5th. And it further shows that on May 19th the moon was at apogee. Simply put on May 6th the moon was close and on May 19th the moon was far.

http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/cen21ce/mo-ap-2012.html

Then we have the ignorance of the 3 different types of solar eclipses possible to view from earth. Total, annular and partial.

The eclipse on May 20th ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_eclipses_in_the_21st_cen... ) is what is called a Annular exclipse in which the sun does NOT, reapeat NOT block out the entire sun. It passes directly in front of it leaving a beautiful halo. Total eclipses are more rare than annular eclipses because the moon has to be the exact distance as well as passing directly in front of the sun.

Here is a site for you to learn about eclipses so that you can understand what is happening when you look into the sky and do not begin calling normal occurances, which have been documented and studied for hundreds of years, extraordinary or alien planets or whatever other imaginary reasons will be conjured up for this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse

It seems you didn't even understand the argument of the video to begin with as their argument is that there wasn't enough time for the moon to be that far away to be that small in the eclipse since the time the supermoon happened.

No wonder there is all this nonsense being spouted about these subjects.

What is wrong with you people?

"Note that the CIA has Uranus in the 8th House, just like Israel and Iran (and George H.W. Bush). Use of eavesdropping technology and the need for getting information "behind the scenes" is a good description of this placement, but another…"

"Trust was put into Vance as Vice President of the US. He should take his role more seriously by trying to ease potential fears instead of fuelling the fire. It’s disappointing because he generally speaks sense, but here he seems to be choosing fear…"

"Yes I agree Drekx, even our family members were reasonable and open minded for Catholics, they weren’t completely insane like some of these others. That tells me it’s a conscious choice to remain blind, there’s really no excuse."

Replies

3smn7ct05z5dx June 3, 2012 at 10:53pm

So I will explain to the leymen here why this appears to be confusing for people. This is filled with so much ignorant assumptions no wonder people are imagining things.

The supermoon is an atmospheric effect NOT an indication that the moon is closest to the earth, so right off the bat the person made a gross error. Here is a site showing the apogee and perigees for the moon and the dates. The moon was actually closer to earth on May 6th than on May 5th. And it further shows that on May 19th the moon was at apogee. Simply put on May 6th the moon was close and on May 19th the moon was far.

http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/cen21ce/mo-ap-2012.html

Then we have the ignorance of the 3 different types of solar eclipses possible to view from earth. Total, annular and partial.

The eclipse on May 20th ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_eclipses_in_the_21st_cen... ) is what is called a Annular exclipse in which the sun does NOT, reapeat NOT block out the entire sun. It passes directly in front of it leaving a beautiful halo. Total eclipses are more rare than annular eclipses because the moon has to be the exact distance as well as passing directly in front of the sun.

Here is a site for you to learn about eclipses so that you can understand what is happening when you look into the sky and do not begin calling normal occurances, which have been documented and studied for hundreds of years, extraordinary or alien planets or whatever other imaginary reasons will be conjured up for this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse

It seems you didn't even understand the argument of the video to begin with as their argument is that there wasn't enough time for the moon to be that far away to be that small in the eclipse since the time the supermoon happened.

No wonder there is all this nonsense being spouted about these subjects.

What is wrong with you people?
beingoflight888 June 3, 2012 at 7:21pm

embrace the possibilities!

Love and more love!