There are no WALLS so the term dimensions is not suitable but the term densities sounds right.
So many keep repeating dimensions ...no no no start saying densities
Above photo from Infowars. A basic conclusion for the uninitiated is provided. This analysis excludes use of the Moon, Ascendant, or Midheaven since we are using a mean time of 12:00 pm. This means the primary tool…
The deep state and…
Replies
How is 'densities' relevant to states/dimensional 'bandwidths' beyond physical, that have no actual *density*?
'Seventh density', for instance, just doesn't work for me... ;)
I've never heard from Star Family/Inner guidance to use 'densities' instead of 'dimensions'.
Obviously, our language can be very inadequate to trying to describe states beyond physicality in a contrast-based experience, where our language systems are based in duality...'this or that'...rather than 'yes, and'....
But of course, if you resonate with densities instead of dimensions, go for it! Just realize that all such terms are limited, when we're attempting to describe that which is meta-physical, infinite, eternal...and we're all just doing our best, with what we've got on this earth plane... :)
Blessings, Joanna 💛✨
I bet 'density' will be the best if you want to apply quantum mechanics in say 'the quantum mind' or 'quantum healing', for instance 'reiki'. The chi or ki, if understood as 'of lower density' has a chance to be a quantum coherent 'superfluid', because quantum decoherence is never 100%. So there is indeed a very less dense fluid that pervades everywhere! This has a good chance of being the 'chi'!
'Another dimension' cannot possibly mean 'another layer of reality'. This is a totaly bulshit usage of the word 'dimension'. Nobody, for instance, can possibly be 'in the fifth dimension'. The best he can be in is that 'one of their dimensions is a fifth dimension'.
But why this, impossible to believe idea? Furthermore, physicists have ruled out the 'existence of large dimensions other than the 4'.