Fluoridation Report just smoke and mirrors in NZ

Fluoridation report “just smoke and mirrors”The long awaited report on the Far North fluoridation trial has finally been released, following presentation to the Far North District Council last Thursday.A highlight of the report was the results from unfluoridated Kawakawa and Moerewa. These showed a remarkable improvement compared with the fluoridated towns, which showed far less.The conclusion and recommendations were as written, and announced, in 2006 – the year before the trial began. “The researchers pre-determined the outcome, and have not let facts get in their way” says Mark Atkin of Fluoride Action Network NZ, after analysing the report. “No wonder the DHB refuses to release the raw data for independent statistical analysis and peer review” he adds, “It would show what a sham this study is.”Fluoridation damages bones as well as teeth 17/02/2010Health Board Retracts Incorrect Information 11/09/2009Fluoridation contributes to $2 billion health cost 27/08/2009Fluoridation Authority sued - $1 m legal costs 01/07/2009Fluoridation issue is about human rights 25/06/2009By all decay measures, there were both increases and decreases in decay in both fluoridated and unfluoridated groups. The results varied by 30 or 40%. “To talk of 5% or 15% claimed improvements from fluoridation, when annual variation is up to 40%, is nonsensical” points out Mr Atkin, adding “So the researchers rely on radiographic pictures in 12 year olds’ teeth as the only evidence of benefit.”Yet the most comprehensive study in Australasia (published in 2004) showed no benefit in 12 year olds. “This study was conspicuous by its omission from the literature review section of the report. A review that also misrepresents two NZ studies as showing benefit when they actually found none” says Mt Atkin. “This is the height of academic dishonesty” he adds.The section on study weaknesses does not mention that there was no control for dental health improvement programmes in schools, which co-researcher Dr Croucher has described as highly successful. The data on some, but not all, programmes were apparently collected, but not allowed for in the results.“This makes the results worthless” points out Mr Atkin, a qualified scientist, noting “how can you say what caused the change in decay if you don’t know who received extra dental health care?”And to top it off, the fluoridation plants never delivered the right amount of fluoride. “Incredible!” exclaims Mr Atkin, “a quarter of a million dollars and in 2 years the equipment never worked properly! All in all, this illegal medical experiment has been a total waste of taxpayer money”.

"The former Prince Andrew, now plain Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, is far more decadent, spoilt, nasty, entitled and corrupt, than many realise....This is a very interesting exposé, by royal biographer; Andrew Lownie and it not only describes the…"

"➕There is much speculation online that Maria Orsitsch was a fictional character, created by conspiracy theorists...This is false, she was totally real and did migrate to Agartha and why they, the WW2 Allies, never found any traces of her, nor her…"

Replies

- Marique > 3rfl3nfqndi4s February 26, 2010 at 1:30am
  
  Flouride is a chemical used to dumb people down and make them docile, tests have been done and it is conclusive. It has been used as a biological agent. They put it in a lot of water supplies in all sorts of cities. Disgusting. Even the flouride in the toothpastes can have bad adverse effects on the body, we were sold yet one more lie by Big Pharma.
  - Barron > Marique February 26, 2010 at 5:43am
    
    Agreed Marique. In fact, there are 23 published studies proving fluoride does indeed lower your IQ! (Not to mention calcify the pineal gland and make people submissive and compliant.

This reply was deleted.

Replies

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Posted by rev.joshua skirvin on February 27, 2023 at 5:58pm…

Note: this page contains paid content.