Holocaust Survivor Claims Obama's America To Be Identical To Hitler's Germany, and Obama To Be VERY SIMILAR To Hitler.

Holocaust Survivor Says Obama’s America identical To Hitler’s Germany

Last Resistance

But we write using our knowledge and research of history and compare that to what we see today. Few of us lived during the time of Hitler and Nazi Germany. But there is one lady who did and she says that watching Obama is nightmarishly like it was watching Adolf Hitler.

Anita Dittman, now 86 years young, lived through the Nazi years of Hitler’s Germany. She remembers Hitler’s rise to power and what it was like living under his dictatorship. Dittman also survived the Holocaust and has recently told her story, which is being included in a project called Trapped in Hitler’s Hell.

Olive Tree Ministry recently held a conference called Understanding the Times at which Dittman spoke. She told those in attendance that when she saw the pictures of Obama with a halo over his head during the 2008 presidential campaign that it gave her nightmares. She spoke of the similarity between the two men, referring to their own self-importance, self-righteousness, and demand for having everything their way.

Dittman also told the audience how much Obama is like Hitler in that they both lied, failed to keep their promises, had visions of grandeur and had messianic visions of themselves. Obama’s list of messianic comments and comparisons is long and some of them are listed and discussed on WND.

What got to me about this is that Dittman isn’t saying these things because of what she’s read or heard about Hitler in books and films. She lived it. She experienced the horrors of Hitler’s dictatorship and she remembers the man, Adolf Hitler.

Now Anita Dittman is reliving the worst nightmare of her life in watching Barack Obama. She sees the very same traits and characteristics in Obama that she saw in Hitler. She sees Obama almost as a Hitler incarnate and that scares her to the point of nightmares. She feels compelled to warn the American people, but sadly, most will never hear her story or what she has to say. The liberal mainstream media will protect Obama at all costs and help him lead his people into the bondage of a maniacal dictator.

Every Republican and Independent running for office this year needs to put Anita Dittman’s comparison of Obama and Hitler in all of their campaigning. They have the ability to inform voters of the dangers of Obama and ask if they want to live through a Nazi America and experience the same horrors that millions of German citizens did. Maybe, just maybe people will start to listen and see with their own eyes just what kind of dangerous political monster Barack Obama really is.

*Hitler was 'demonized'?... oh, for fu#@s sake, Andronover. Your so-called 'homework' merely reflects your efforts to cosign your own fear-based perceptions. Nothing more, nothing less. ~InLight555

The Holocaust Denial Movement

By Heidi Beirich

Holocaust deniers argue that the genocide of Jews during World War II either did not occur or was much less horrific than historians say. But their work is much more than a simple re-interpretation of the historical evidence. Holocaust denial is a political movement that is inherently anti-Semitic, meant, for the most part, to make national socialism more palatable — how many people, after all, want to support an ideology responsible for the industrialized murder of several million Jews? Many deniers cloak their hatred in academic language, seeking to give the appearance that they are honest, if skeptical, students of history. They prefer to call themselves “Holocaust revisionists,” a phrase hijacked from “historical revisionism,” a school of credible historians who offered new interpretations for the origins of World War I.

Deniers usually argue that the number of Nazi victims is far smaller than the toll calculated by historians of the era and was the result of disease far more often than of deliberate murder on the part of the Nazis. In particular, they take issue with the commonly cited number of 6 million Jews killed during the Holocaust. Many deniers also assert that the ovens used by the Nazi regime in extermination camps in Poland were not capable of incinerating nearly as many bodies as the Allies said were destroyed in them. Some claim there were no gas chambers at all.

Some revisionists even extend their claims in an attempt to debunk Jews who seem sympathetic to most human beings. A case in point is the argument by certain deniers that the diary of teenager Anne Frank is a fraud because it had alterations made with a postwar ballpoint pen (they didn’t mention that the marks were made later by Frank’s father). They have lied about the qualities of the Zyklon B gas used to kill Jews, the operation of the Einsatzgruppen (the mobile killing squads that shot more than 1 million Jews on the Eastern Front), and hundreds of other facts.

Holocaust denial began with the original Nazis, who tried to carry out their murderous program in secret and obscured it with misleading terminology in their official records. But it was after the war that the movement blossomed. European and American neo-fascists came to understand that a national socialist revival would be possible only if the accusation of a Nazi genocide of the Jews — an accusation backed by mountains of evidence and testimony — was undermined.

Americans were prominent in early, postwar denial circles. One of them, Austin J. App, was an English professor at the University of Scranton who had defended Germany during World War II. He claimed that Germany didn’t desire to “dominate” Europe but rather was legitimately attempting to get raw materials. Once the war ended, App energetically denied German atrocities.

More significant was Harry Elmer Barnes, an American isolationist. In a 1962 pamphlet calledBlasting the Historical Blackout, he claimed that the ethnic Germans who were expelled from Czechoslovakia and Poland after the war suffered a fate “obviously far more hideous and prolonged than those of the Jews said to have been exterminated in great numbers by the Nazis.” Four years later, Barnes produced Revisionism: A Key to Peace, a book alleging that “it is alarmingly easy to demonstrate that the atrocities of the Allies in the same period were more numerous as to victims and were carried out for the most part by methods more brutal and painful than alleged extermination in gas ovens.” (A prominent contemporary Holocaust denial publication, The Barnes Review, is named after Barnes.)

The most important denier in American post-war history arguably was George Lincoln Rockwell, founder of the American Nazi Party (ANP). Rockwell, who named the ANP’s canine mascot “gas chamber” as a sign of his contempt for Jewish claims of Nazi gassings, understood early on that Nazism would never experience a renaissance anywhere if the stain of the genocide could not be expunged. An enthusiastic denier, Rockwell in 1966 told Playboy that it was “self-defense” for people to kill Jews. “Are you implying that Hitler was justified in exterminating 6 million European Jews?”Playboy interviewer Alex Haley asked. “I don’t believe for one minute that any 6 million Jews wereexterminated,” Rockwell replied. “It never happened. You want me to prove it?” Rockwell then offered up statistics purporting to show that there were more Jews alive after the war than before it.

Rockwell’s acolytes would carry on his denial campaign after his assassination by a disgruntled follower in 1967. For example, National Socialist Party of America leader Frank Collin enthusiastically embraced denial, saying, “There was no Holocaust, but they deserve one — and will get it.”

In 1976, another American, Arthur R. Butz, wrote The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. A professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University, Butz in his book conceded that Jews were persecuted but denied they were exterminated. Any gas chambers were for delousing, and not for mass murder, he claimed. There would be others, too, including Gary “Gerhard” Lauck, a Nebraskan Hitler enthusiast who wrote, published and helped smuggle illegal denial literature into Germany and other European countries in the 1980s and early 1990s.

But Americans have done much more than merely contribute to the storehouse of Holocaust denial literature. They have institutionalized the enterprise. In 1978, Willis Carto — founder and head of the now defunct anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby, based in Washington, D.C. — spun off a new organization called the Institute for Historical Review (IHR). IHR presented itself as a legitimate historical research group but in fact was peopled by white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

The institute’s mission was the same as Rockwell’s: Erase the Holocaust by any means at its disposal, including distortion, misquotation and outright falsification. IHR’s first annual conference was held in 1979. As in subsequent meetings, deniers from around the world attended and helped to introduce some key American extremists to Holocaust denial. David Duke, the neo-Nazi who was then the national leader of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, was so taken with the idea that he followed up the conference with an issue of his Crusader newspaper that he dubbed the “Special Holocaust Edition.”

IHR’s annual conferences quickly became key events on the radical right that offered networking opportunities for neo-Nazis and anti-Semites from around the world. A critical contribution by IHR was its attempt to encourage anti-Semites to avoid blatant Jew-hatred in their discussions of the war and instead to couch their venom in academic-sounding distortions of history and science. Though the theories that resulted were ahistorical, they had at least a thin veneer of legitimacy, as did theJournal of Historical Review that the IHR published for years.

IHR began to falter after control of the group was wrested from Carto by staffer Mark Weber in 1995 after a long legal battle. Weber’s tenure since that time has been less than successful. The group’s last regular annual conference was in 1994, and since then only small gatherings have been held. In 2002, Weber stopped publishing the Journal of Historical Review because of a “lack of staff and funding.” IHR now has been reduced to little more than publishing Web commentary and various posts from Weber, who also gives a few speeches each year.

In 2009, Weber became the object of extreme ire in the denial world after writing an essay that asked, “How Relevant Is Holocaust Revisionism?” Weber’s conclusion? Not very. His essay argued that the decades-long revisionist effort had been “as much a hindrance as a help” in fighting what Weber has now decided is the real enemy – “Jewish-Zionist power.” He advocated a shift in the movement toward “the real world struggle” against Jewish power. For Weber, debating the existence of the World War II Holocaust of European Jewry has become a waste of time.

Weber’s views were roundly condemned by his fellow deniers, many of whom publicly — and furiously — called for his ouster.

The year after he lost control of IHR, Carto established a publication to compete with the IHR’s journal, calling it The Barnes Review. The Review also holds regular Holocaust denial conferences, filling the void left by IHR.

To this day, U.S. groups such as the neo-Nazi National Alliance publish and sell Holocaust denial material. To most of them, Jews intentionally made up the “Holohoax” as part of a nefarious plan to extract war reparations from Germany to help found the state of Israel, and to win the world’s sympathy. Many Europeans also have played an important part in this enterprise, but they have been hampered by laws that punish denial and other statements seen as inciting racial hatred. This has left the Americans, with their speech protected by the First Amendment, in a unique and important position to disseminate denial materials worldwide.

The path to Freedom is not served by denying the shadows of our history.

Hi Barry!

Please ignore the self appointed "true light workers" here. It doesn't take much to figure out that all they really work for is to get a reaction. Name calling is their weapon of choice; they will call you everything you can imagine! Eventually you will be labeled a troll, a paid CIA informant, a satanist, a MKUltra victim etc.

Sometimes their lies become so big and they cannot longer defend themselves, so they get their panties in a bunch, and make a big announcement about leaving this community, just like a certain Mr. Ed did. Or maybe he is just enjoying his millions, because he was entitled to, being such a good patriotic american...oh it's a long story...anyway, by now you get a picture of what is going on here. If you have a smidgen of common sense, you WILL be attacked. Clear rational thinking is the worst thing you can do to these people.

My heart aches for 1Darkastar, it really must be hard to be you, what a sad existence you must live...

Oh, and i have always asked to myself where does Malcolm find all the time to read all those lengthy articles, watch the videos, do charts, research and a lot more, while allegedly working as a nurse full time in a hospital...I feel sorry for his patients.

One more thing: Obama is good/bad whatever, he's a politician, we all have our opinions, and that's ok...however you might have also figured out that to certain people here the worst thing about this president is that he's...how should I say it..it rhymes with "trigger"...

"Would you like to see Dr Eric Berg working alongside RFK Jnr, in the new golden age, health administration..?? Here's your chance to vote on that possibility...

https://discourse.nomineesforthepeople.com/t/dr-eric-berg-dc/765"

"It's important to note that there are currently deployed secret projects craft, such as TR3B Black Manta, noted for their triangular hulls and not to be confused with ET craft, which generally, are much larger in size....Considering that surface…"

"Get Movin' (Original Mix) · The Family's Jam, The Best Of The Family's Jam, Vol. 2, ℗ Plaizir Muzic, Released on: 2018-12-10, Composer: The Family's Jam👏🏻🌞

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN1CXmA0I64&list=OLAK5uy_nrN9tK..."

Replies

tleespirit May 29, 2014 at 2:11pm

This entire post does not resonate spiritually on any level. I rarely comment because I come to learn and listen and takes what resonates - leave the rest. But I feel compelled to say this... your post just seems dark - negative - and false.
Klaas May 29, 2014 at 9:18am

There are no good guys! All of them are Jesuit slaves.

Obummer, Putin and Alex Jones playing the same game.

Alex is CIA $hit.
- Klaas > Klaas May 29, 2014 at 9:41am
Andronover May 29, 2014 at 8:04am

So many posts here but NOONE - I repeat NOONE is presenting the truth about the holohoax here.

What does this show about you?

I understand that there are agents and trolls here , but I thought that people would Wake up sooner or later , and I understand now that it will be later.

You keep on demonizing Hitler based on info from corrupt schoolbooks and corrupt media , and are still arguing whether Obama is a good guy or not.

This has been ongoing for some years now with different players involved , and you keep on stomp on the same Place.

Is the evolution completely lost here?

DO YOUR HOMEWORK FOLKS!!!!!

The Red Cross did their work - please read : http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.se/2007/06/official-records...

Read the protocol's , and you will understand why Hitler is demonized by the Zionist Khazar media.

http://abundanthope.net/artman2/uploads/1/Pr_v_ZION-Eng.pdf

When will you understand the true agenda of "the greater Israel" and that "Obama" merely is a spokesperson to these people?

The path to freedom is truth.
- Stick > Andronover May 29, 2014 at 9:06am
  
  *Hitler was 'demonized'?... oh, for fu#@s sake, Andronover. Your so-called 'homework' merely reflects your efforts to cosign your own fear-based perceptions. Nothing more, nothing less. ~InLight555
  
  The Holocaust Denial Movement
  
  By Heidi Beirich
  
  Holocaust deniers argue that the genocide of Jews during World War II either did not occur or was much less horrific than historians say. But their work is much more than a simple re-interpretation of the historical evidence. Holocaust denial is a political movement that is inherently anti-Semitic, meant, for the most part, to make national socialism more palatable — how many people, after all, want to support an ideology responsible for the industrialized murder of several million Jews? Many deniers cloak their hatred in academic language, seeking to give the appearance that they are honest, if skeptical, students of history. They prefer to call themselves “Holocaust revisionists,” a phrase hijacked from “historical revisionism,” a school of credible historians who offered new interpretations for the origins of World War I.
  
  Deniers usually argue that the number of Nazi victims is far smaller than the toll calculated by historians of the era and was the result of disease far more often than of deliberate murder on the part of the Nazis. In particular, they take issue with the commonly cited number of 6 million Jews killed during the Holocaust. Many deniers also assert that the ovens used by the Nazi regime in extermination camps in Poland were not capable of incinerating nearly as many bodies as the Allies said were destroyed in them. Some claim there were no gas chambers at all.
  
  Some revisionists even extend their claims in an attempt to debunk Jews who seem sympathetic to most human beings. A case in point is the argument by certain deniers that the diary of teenager Anne Frank is a fraud because it had alterations made with a postwar ballpoint pen (they didn’t mention that the marks were made later by Frank’s father). They have lied about the qualities of the Zyklon B gas used to kill Jews, the operation of the Einsatzgruppen (the mobile killing squads that shot more than 1 million Jews on the Eastern Front), and hundreds of other facts.
  
  Holocaust denial began with the original Nazis, who tried to carry out their murderous program in secret and obscured it with misleading terminology in their official records. But it was after the war that the movement blossomed. European and American neo-fascists came to understand that a national socialist revival would be possible only if the accusation of a Nazi genocide of the Jews — an accusation backed by mountains of evidence and testimony — was undermined.
  
  Americans were prominent in early, postwar denial circles. One of them, Austin J. App, was an English professor at the University of Scranton who had defended Germany during World War II. He claimed that Germany didn’t desire to “dominate” Europe but rather was legitimately attempting to get raw materials. Once the war ended, App energetically denied German atrocities.
  
  More significant was Harry Elmer Barnes, an American isolationist. In a 1962 pamphlet calledBlasting the Historical Blackout, he claimed that the ethnic Germans who were expelled from Czechoslovakia and Poland after the war suffered a fate “obviously far more hideous and prolonged than those of the Jews said to have been exterminated in great numbers by the Nazis.” Four years later, Barnes produced Revisionism: A Key to Peace, a book alleging that “it is alarmingly easy to demonstrate that the atrocities of the Allies in the same period were more numerous as to victims and were carried out for the most part by methods more brutal and painful than alleged extermination in gas ovens.” (A prominent contemporary Holocaust denial publication, The Barnes Review, is named after Barnes.)
  
  The most important denier in American post-war history arguably was George Lincoln Rockwell, founder of the American Nazi Party (ANP). Rockwell, who named the ANP’s canine mascot “gas chamber” as a sign of his contempt for Jewish claims of Nazi gassings, understood early on that Nazism would never experience a renaissance anywhere if the stain of the genocide could not be expunged. An enthusiastic denier, Rockwell in 1966 told Playboy that it was “self-defense” for people to kill Jews. “Are you implying that Hitler was justified in exterminating 6 million European Jews?”Playboy interviewer Alex Haley asked. “I don’t believe for one minute that any 6 million Jews wereexterminated,” Rockwell replied. “It never happened. You want me to prove it?” Rockwell then offered up statistics purporting to show that there were more Jews alive after the war than before it.
  
  Rockwell’s acolytes would carry on his denial campaign after his assassination by a disgruntled follower in 1967. For example, National Socialist Party of America leader Frank Collin enthusiastically embraced denial, saying, “There was no Holocaust, but they deserve one — and will get it.”
  
  In 1976, another American, Arthur R. Butz, wrote The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. A professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University, Butz in his book conceded that Jews were persecuted but denied they were exterminated. Any gas chambers were for delousing, and not for mass murder, he claimed. There would be others, too, including Gary “Gerhard” Lauck, a Nebraskan Hitler enthusiast who wrote, published and helped smuggle illegal denial literature into Germany and other European countries in the 1980s and early 1990s.
  
  But Americans have done much more than merely contribute to the storehouse of Holocaust denial literature. They have institutionalized the enterprise. In 1978, Willis Carto — founder and head of the now defunct anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby, based in Washington, D.C. — spun off a new organization called the Institute for Historical Review (IHR). IHR presented itself as a legitimate historical research group but in fact was peopled by white supremacists and neo-Nazis.
  
  The institute’s mission was the same as Rockwell’s: Erase the Holocaust by any means at its disposal, including distortion, misquotation and outright falsification. IHR’s first annual conference was held in 1979. As in subsequent meetings, deniers from around the world attended and helped to introduce some key American extremists to Holocaust denial. David Duke, the neo-Nazi who was then the national leader of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, was so taken with the idea that he followed up the conference with an issue of his Crusader newspaper that he dubbed the “Special Holocaust Edition.”
  
  IHR’s annual conferences quickly became key events on the radical right that offered networking opportunities for neo-Nazis and anti-Semites from around the world. A critical contribution by IHR was its attempt to encourage anti-Semites to avoid blatant Jew-hatred in their discussions of the war and instead to couch their venom in academic-sounding distortions of history and science. Though the theories that resulted were ahistorical, they had at least a thin veneer of legitimacy, as did theJournal of Historical Review that the IHR published for years.
  
  IHR began to falter after control of the group was wrested from Carto by staffer Mark Weber in 1995 after a long legal battle. Weber’s tenure since that time has been less than successful. The group’s last regular annual conference was in 1994, and since then only small gatherings have been held. In 2002, Weber stopped publishing the Journal of Historical Review because of a “lack of staff and funding.” IHR now has been reduced to little more than publishing Web commentary and various posts from Weber, who also gives a few speeches each year.
  
  In 2009, Weber became the object of extreme ire in the denial world after writing an essay that asked, “How Relevant Is Holocaust Revisionism?” Weber’s conclusion? Not very. His essay argued that the decades-long revisionist effort had been “as much a hindrance as a help” in fighting what Weber has now decided is the real enemy – “Jewish-Zionist power.” He advocated a shift in the movement toward “the real world struggle” against Jewish power. For Weber, debating the existence of the World War II Holocaust of European Jewry has become a waste of time.
  
  Weber’s views were roundly condemned by his fellow deniers, many of whom publicly — and furiously — called for his ouster.
  
  The year after he lost control of IHR, Carto established a publication to compete with the IHR’s journal, calling it The Barnes Review. The Review also holds regular Holocaust denial conferences, filling the void left by IHR.
  
  To this day, U.S. groups such as the neo-Nazi National Alliance publish and sell Holocaust denial material. To most of them, Jews intentionally made up the “Holohoax” as part of a nefarious plan to extract war reparations from Germany to help found the state of Israel, and to win the world’s sympathy. Many Europeans also have played an important part in this enterprise, but they have been hampered by laws that punish denial and other statements seen as inciting racial hatred. This has left the Americans, with their speech protected by the First Amendment, in a unique and important position to disseminate denial materials worldwide.
  
  The path to Freedom is not served by denying the shadows of our history.
Stick May 29, 2014 at 7:10am

~To the purveyors of fear & division... who continue to use ACC as a dumping ground for the promotion of low-grade posts like this one, & the offensive notion of the Holohoax... you shame no one but yourselves.

~On the flip side of the Multidimensional coin... Let's shine some Light in here! ;-) Much Respect to ALL who continue to stand up against these kind of corrosive energies & root their Intent in Frequencies that maintain the overall Integrity of this site. Keep Up The Good Works Ashtar Massive!!! 'The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few... or the one.' ~InLight555

AsAbove

SoBelow

Door peep shall not enter this a Holy Land
Where Wise & True Man stand
Sipping from the Cup of Peace
Not one shall enter
Not one

Door people shall not enter
This a Holy Land
Where Wise & True Man stand
Sipping from the Cup of Peace
We Chant Down a Babylon
We Chant Down a Babylon
We Chant Down a Babylon
Chant Down a Babylon...

OneLoveRevolution247
Malcolm May 29, 2014 at 6:13am

NANCY, FOR THE RECORD:

I am joking. Me and Enrico have had these harmless swipe exchanges in the past.

And it's caffeine-free.
Michael May 29, 2014 at 5:33am

thats a good finger, Barry.....................
enrico May 29, 2014 at 1:32am

Hi Barry!

Please ignore the self appointed "true light workers" here. It doesn't take much to figure out that all they really work for is to get a reaction. Name calling is their weapon of choice; they will call you everything you can imagine! Eventually you will be labeled a troll, a paid CIA informant, a satanist, a MKUltra victim etc.

Sometimes their lies become so big and they cannot longer defend themselves, so they get their panties in a bunch, and make a big announcement about leaving this community, just like a certain Mr. Ed did. Or maybe he is just enjoying his millions, because he was entitled to, being such a good patriotic american...oh it's a long story...anyway, by now you get a picture of what is going on here. If you have a smidgen of common sense, you WILL be attacked. Clear rational thinking is the worst thing you can do to these people.

My heart aches for 1Darkastar, it really must be hard to be you, what a sad existence you must live...

Oh, and i have always asked to myself where does Malcolm find all the time to read all those lengthy articles, watch the videos, do charts, research and a lot more, while allegedly working as a nurse full time in a hospital...I feel sorry for his patients.

One more thing: Obama is good/bad whatever, he's a politician, we all have our opinions, and that's ok...however you might have also figured out that to certain people here the worst thing about this president is that he's...how should I say it..it rhymes with "trigger"...
Avatar May 29, 2014 at 1:28am

Barry, please do not let your first experience here discourage you. There are many other things you can read that would be more to your liking. I'm sorry you've not been made welcome by a few on ACC but not everyone is like that. When Malcolm is not talking about Obama or other controversial subjects he's a good guy and knows his astrology.

Please do not judge all of ACC by what has happened here.

of 8

This reply was deleted.

Spiritual Forum

Holocaust Survivor Claims Obama's America To Be Identical To Hitler's Germany, and Obama To Be VERY SIMILAR To Hitler.

Holocaust Survivor Says Obama’s America identical To Hitler’s Germany

Replies

Latest Discussion

Anything Health Related

Anything UFO Or ET Related

The Soul of Mother Russia Resonates With The Incoming Aquarian Ray - Like Attracts Like

Note: this page contains paid content.

Most Popular Discussion

The hidden meaning behind the color of the eyes

Blood Type and Starseed Origins

Comprehensive List Of Companies That Use Aborted Fetal Cells As Flavor

Note: this page contains paid content.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Latest Activity

New Blog Posts

Cry Babies; Leftists stockpiling goods before inauguration in effort to kill Trump economy “for the next four years”

US Closes Kyiv Embassy, Warns Of Impending ‘Significant Air Attack’ After Biden Allowed American Missiles To Strike Russia

RELATIONSHIP ASTROLOGY: case study on country music legends Johnny Cash & June Carter ... A real test case for rules in relationship astrology applied to a successful relationship.

HOROSCOPE OF UKRAINE: long-range missile use by Ukraine indicates major conflict about to take place on Ukraine soil. Ukraine may be "playing with fire" with Mars Opposition Ascendant.

Note: this page contains paid content.