Horror at halal slaughterhouse: Shocking undercover film shows the 'needless suffering' of livestock that are butchered without being stunned first

British law requires abattoirs to stun animals before slaughter but there is an exemption for Jewish and Muslim producersThere are believed to be 12 slaughterhouses in the UK that do not stunCampaigners are pushing for unstunned slaughter to be banned entirelyThe halal market in this country is worth £2.6billionThe video was taken at a Simply Halal abattoir which claims to supply mainstream supermarkets, meaning people may be unwittingly buying unstunned meatKnife poised at the throat of a helpless sheep, this is the moment a slaughterman cuts the throat of a fully conscious animal.Our exclusive pictures reveal for the first time the full horror of a religious practice that Britain’s top vet wants outlawed.Undercover Mail on Sunday investigators secretly filmed inside a halal abattoir as more than 100 sheep appeared to writhe in agony after being ritually killed.Read More and see Photos @ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2603360/Horror-halal-slaughterhouse-Shocking-undercover-film-shows-needless-suffering-livestock-butchered-without-stunned-first.html

Why People Ignore the Truth About Where Their Meat Actually Comes From

820

770

Abigail Geer

April 10, 2014

27 Comments

ONEGREENPLANETANIMALS & NATURE

Mainstream society has deemed it ethically acceptable to consume animals, yet people are increasingly less tolerant of seeing the origins of their own food. While (nearly) everybody is aware that beef comes from cows, pork from pigs, and chicken from ……chickens, there is a widening gap between what we see presented in supermarkets and restaurants, and the gory details taking place behind the scenes.

Now more than ever, people have become accustomed to seeing their meat only when it has been pristinely packaged in cellophane, while completely ignoring who it is they are actually eating and what kind of hell they were living in before ending up in their shopping cart.

As we evolve as a society, the sight of a half butchered pig, or a string of dead birds fully feathered hanging in the shop window is leaving us increasingly unsettled and it’s about time to start asking ourselves why.

Outrage at meat being hung in a butcher’s shop

A recent incident in the U.K. has highlighted the issue perfectly, showing just how far removed we have become from the truth of where our food comes from. A butchers shop has been forced to stop displaying dead animals in their shop window after public outcry from local residents. One resident told reporters that the window display “looks more like a scene from a horror movie.” This is something you might expect to hear from an impassioned group of animal activists, but not from those who consume animal products themselves on a daily basis. So what’s really going on here, surely meat eaters shouldn’t have a problem seeing a dead animal carcass?

The psychology of meat consumption

Meat processing plants suit our desire to disconnect from the source of our meat as they present us with a packaged product which in no way resembles its original animal host. Researchers conducted tests to investigate the mental process of thinking about the source of their food, and how differing amounts of knowledge and thought on the subject would influence their desire to consume meat and their consequent mood while doing so. The section of participants who were told that they would be eating an apple attributed more mental qualities to a cow than those who were told they would be sampling beef products. Those who thought they were going to be consuming beef denied the cows many of the attributes given by the other test group as this enabled them to reduce the amount of moral concern over the issue. In effect, the study highlighted what we are seeing in real life — that people who can disconnect from the imagery of the actual animal who was killed for their meat are able to worry less about the ethical issues related with its death. Out of sight, out of mind.

Another well known medical study investigated the brain functions of patients while they were shown various images of suffering and abuse. The vegetarians and vegans who were tested showed more brain activity than meat eaters when witnessing negative scenes, with the vegans showing the highest level of brain function connected to empathy.

Which animals to love and which animals to eat?

Around the world different animals are deemed socially acceptable forms of food. In the Western world, eating dogs is seen as horrific and cruel, but eating cows is perfectly accepted, while in other areas, cows are revered as holy animals and kept off the menu. The recent U.K. horse meat scandal has once again highlighted the moral issues we face when deciding to choose which animals to love and which to eat. It was acceptable to eat a beef burger, but when people thought it might in fact be a horse that was hiding in-between their burger bap they were outraged.

Becoming too emotionally attached to the animals we eat doesn’t sit well with our conscience, which is why as a society we push back against anything which reminds us of the stark reality behind our food choices. It’s okay to buy pork loins from the store as long as they do not resemble the animal they came from, yet they wouldn’t be so eager to open their wallet had they witnessed the murder and butchering of the pig themselves. The more media attention that food animals receive, they harder people try to detach themselves from who is on their plate, but you can’t ignore the truth forever.

"More crazy shite;
Watch: Actress Goes On Racist Vulgar Rant During Interview With CA Gov. Newsom
https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-ex-snl-actress-goes-on-racist-..."

"Good video Agarther :) Since this was in D.C. I'm wondering if these GFL ships were keeping an eye on the Deep State players there making sure they weren't up to anything nefarious."

Replies

Michael April 14, 2014 at 3:30am

Why People Ignore the Truth About Where Their Meat Actually Comes From

820 TOTAL SHARES


48 Tweet

1 +1

1 Pin

0 Stumbleupon

0 LinkedIn

0

0

Abigail Geer
April 10, 2014 27 Comments

ONEGREENPLANETANIMALS & NATURE

Mainstream society has deemed it ethically acceptable to consume animals, yet people are increasingly less tolerant of seeing the origins of their own food. While (nearly) everybody is aware that beef comes from cows, pork from pigs, and chicken from ……chickens, there is a widening gap between what we see presented in supermarkets and restaurants, and the gory details taking place behind the scenes.

Now more than ever, people have become accustomed to seeing their meat only when it has been pristinely packaged in cellophane, while completely ignoring who it is they are actually eating and what kind of hell they were living in before ending up in their shopping cart.

As we evolve as a society, the sight of a half butchered pig, or a string of dead birds fully feathered hanging in the shop window is leaving us increasingly unsettled and it’s about time to start asking ourselves why.

Outrage at meat being hung in a butcher’s shop

A recent incident in the U.K. has highlighted the issue perfectly, showing just how far removed we have become from the truth of where our food comes from. A butchers shop has been forced to stop displaying dead animals in their shop window after public outcry from local residents. One resident told reporters that the window display “looks more like a scene from a horror movie.” This is something you might expect to hear from an impassioned group of animal activists, but not from those who consume animal products themselves on a daily basis. So what’s really going on here, surely meat eaters shouldn’t have a problem seeing a dead animal carcass?

The psychology of meat consumption

Meat processing plants suit our desire to disconnect from the source of our meat as they present us with a packaged product which in no way resembles its original animal host. Researchers conducted tests to investigate the mental process of thinking about the source of their food, and how differing amounts of knowledge and thought on the subject would influence their desire to consume meat and their consequent mood while doing so. The section of participants who were told that they would be eating an apple attributed more mental qualities to a cow than those who were told they would be sampling beef products. Those who thought they were going to be consuming beef denied the cows many of the attributes given by the other test group as this enabled them to reduce the amount of moral concern over the issue. In effect, the study highlighted what we are seeing in real life — that people who can disconnect from the imagery of the actual animal who was killed for their meat are able to worry less about the ethical issues related with its death. Out of sight, out of mind.

Another well known medical study investigated the brain functions of patients while they were shown various images of suffering and abuse. The vegetarians and vegans who were tested showed more brain activity than meat eaters when witnessing negative scenes, with the vegans showing the highest level of brain function connected to empathy.

Which animals to love and which animals to eat?

Around the world different animals are deemed socially acceptable forms of food. In the Western world, eating dogs is seen as horrific and cruel, but eating cows is perfectly accepted, while in other areas, cows are revered as holy animals and kept off the menu. The recent U.K. horse meat scandal has once again highlighted the moral issues we face when deciding to choose which animals to love and which to eat. It was acceptable to eat a beef burger, but when people thought it might in fact be a horse that was hiding in-between their burger bap they were outraged.

Becoming too emotionally attached to the animals we eat doesn’t sit well with our conscience, which is why as a society we push back against anything which reminds us of the stark reality behind our food choices. It’s okay to buy pork loins from the store as long as they do not resemble the animal they came from, yet they wouldn’t be so eager to open their wallet had they witnessed the murder and butchering of the pig themselves. The more media attention that food animals receive, they harder people try to detach themselves from who is on their plate, but you can’t ignore the truth forever.
Acute Observer April 14, 2014 at 12:50am

I'm not saying he is wrong. I'm saying he has a poor strategy for the kind of war he is waging. If he want to win his war, he will have to improve his strategy first. ;)

When I "judge" what is said here I'm not doing it through My eyes, I'm doing it through the eyes of so called "normal people" and how they think and react, and from that I am able to derive that their reactions to this information is quite the opposite than what it should be whereas it must be the messenger who's bad at delivering it properly. :)
Acute Observer April 14, 2014 at 12:39am

You only have to follow those instructions if you want Veganism to have a real future in the world. If that is not your goal, then my instructions are completely useless to you. ;)
1 darkstar April 13, 2014 at 9:21pm

Traxiss: Not necessarily so.
1 darkstar April 13, 2014 at 9:05pm

Feather Winger: Or, as they say, you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
Acute Observer April 13, 2014 at 8:38pm

Drugs is what you get when you kill a cannabis sativa-plant prematurely. :)
Acute Observer April 13, 2014 at 8:26pm

There will be no time for drugs in the new world. :)
Michael April 13, 2014 at 7:26pm

...then you should watch a vid with his secretary who clearly states that hes not veggie, just had some vegetarian foods prepared for him because of his parkinsons and other issues but never 100%.
Acute Observer April 13, 2014 at 7:13pm

To level the entire South America and make a hemp-field out of it should take care of much of the food production in the world provided everyone can manage eating nothing but hemp-seeds every day.

We may need Siberia too. I'll talk to Putin and see if I can get him to release it to the UN for food-production.

Sahara may also be of interest if we can find a cheap way to desalinate sea-water. The sand-people currently living there can either be farmers or they can get out of our way. It's their choice. ;)

These lands are optimal since at least 2 of them won't require us to forcibly displace people.
Acute Observer April 13, 2014 at 7:08pm

That's what I love about the material Universe. It's calculable.

Input good work + good intention and the result can only be positive. :)