You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
"Speaking of ancient times do you have any info on Hybornea Drekx which as you know was an area settled before colonists settled in Lemuria? We hear about Lemuria and Atlantis all the time, but we have not talked much about Hybornea. I know it lasted…"
Posted on 03/17/2026 by EraOfLightThis past week, we shifted again, a significant shift that was very exciting. This established the New Earth firmly and securely in the midst of the old and made it our home. We’ve been going back and forth,…
receive that higher understanding,2 receive that beginning of awakening,that is what u r all here 2 do,2 bring this awakening process 4word
A vision that the founding fathers of this country had,a vision that;what u call the white hat alliance,has. A vision that many of the world
Posted on 03/17/2026 by EraOfLightI am Saint Germain,And I come to be with you at this time, in these times, these momentous times that you are approaching right now. These times that were foretold, when I as Saint Germain showed up in that time,…
"Greta probably does use a salad bowl on her head and trims around it....Apparently this psycho girl is 23-years old and for a young woman of that age, you would assume she seeks to look feminine, as in a woman.....But, the puritanical fanatic within…"
Replies
"A set of beleifs that attempts to connect humanity to spirituality"
Science on the other hand is just objective knowledge.
It is easy stated than done. A real coffee time is how do we obtain this objective knowledge. It is here where 'scientific method comes' in. Because scientific method is a method ultimately done by a fallible human being, science can never fail to have its own shortcommings. It is here where science can ultimately bear the hallmark of a religion.
Science has realy never been done as simply observation and deductions. If it were so, indead it could stear away from religion. Modern scientist simply doesn't do that. He rather begines by making an hypothesis based on how he thinks the universe works!! This was clearly done by Darwin, Einstein, String theorists, Inflation theorists, Supersymmetry theorists etc. Our guy then DEDUCE the inevitable consequences of his theory, (which he calls it by a fancy name, 'prediction') then goes out to look for evidences that matches the prediction, phew!
You gotta be able to smell from far that this method is 100% identical to 'religion'!! Our scientist is gonna use the prediction to INFERE that his otherwise unobservable factors are infact true. But what is the difference btwn this and a theory of god?? The example of unobservable factors are:
i)The extreemly slow evolution
ii)Field
iii)wavefunction
iv)fundamental particles
v)curved spacetime
vi)Dark matter
vii)Fourth dimension
viii)26 dimensions
ix)Big bang
x)Black holes
xi)inflation
the list is endles. Ergo in this sense science IS a religion!!
Thanks for understanding this subtle fact. Science have ended up claiming that they can chew buble gum and yet you smell croundnuts.
"A scientific claim is not to be taken by faith but must be open to questioning and critizisism"
But what does it mean to talk of a last man standing battle when only a single guy is allowed in the ring??
TRUE SCIENCE
It must train students to learn how to reason for themselves. To know how to seive sense from nonsense. Or in short, to become the true scientists that they are preaching about. But only the church, as in Jehovah witness, fear to bring the magazine of say the Seventh Day Adventist to their church. This unambiguously shove the chameleon of science squarely under the folder of religion.
Yes, science ITSELF is a religion.