Secrets revealed in Leonardo Da Vinci's Last Supper show only 11 Apostles, Mary, Jesus, and a Child with a knife to it's back, held by Judas, as if to say If Jesus doesn't play along the child will die. The people on the right are having a conversation about what to do with Jesus, how they might put him down.
It's possible that Mary was herself one of the Apostles and it may have been covered up by manufacturing a fake Apostle known as Simon the Zealot. Very little is known about Simon the Zealot, less then any other Apostle. A new theory suggests Simon Peter and Simon the Zealot were one and the same, where scripture is interpreted to suggest Simon ALSO betrayed him, that is along with Judas, where it says "Judas, who ALSO betrayed him."
The point is, it all went sour. Things have been added to the Bible as late as the 9th century. The new testament, outside of the Gospels and Revelation is completely false and unreliable. It was written by Catholic Priests and is not the least bit inspired! The Pharisees were making up their own doctrines, which is what Jesus was against, he wasn't trying to get rid of the Torah Law and replace it with Roman Authority as Paul did.
Peter and Mary have a falling out in the Gospel of Thomas, where Peter wants her to leave. Peter is prophecied by Jesus to be taken where he didn't want to go by another, notably Paul. 1 and 2 Peter weren't even written by Peter. In the book of Acts Peter gets into an incident with Saphia and Ananias where Luke says they saw the Holy Spirit and instantly died. OR maybe Peter killed them, because they were about to sell the whole deed to the land where the church community that shared everything in common was located. So in order to prevent losing their church, Peter might have just killed them and gotten Luke to lie on his behalf.
The book of Acts already has Luke getting up into other lies. In particular where Paul is brought up on charges of the Jerusalem council for teaching against the Torah Laws, and Peter says something like "Why condemn him for not following laws you yourselves, nor your fathers ever could." He effectively states the Torah is unnecessary even for Jews. Seeing as Paul was in trouble for this very reason, Peter would have been arrested on the spot if he had actually said that.
The book of Acts begins with a Jewish movement and ends with a Roman State. Because so much corruption is evident, even in the texts themselves, Christianity will collapse almost completely. The sun will be ashamed, the moon (mainstream Judaism) will be confounded. The pharisees, including Paul, wanted to make up their own rules instead of obeying the word of God, and inserted those rules into the Bible. The New Testament = 666 and the New Covenant is only for Israel and Judah anyway.
Oh, if you want to see the video about Simon Peter assisting in the betrayal of Jesus, it's called Simon Peter Son of Leviathan, and the main problem was that it lacked evidence. Until now.
Replies
Leonardo Da Vinci was an amazing man and an amazing artist, but like so many artists he was highly opinionated and closed-minded, which allowed him to make errors. "The Last Supper" had no reflections of Judaism or Jewish symbolism whatsoever in the painting, and was more of a personal editorial (as is most of Da Vinci's works) than a historical event from which we can make interpretations.