Spiritual Forum

It is a sad fact how the life of John F. Kennedy came to an end.

Some have told me ´he was no angel´.

Others thought he was the Third Antichrist mentioned in Nostradamus´prophecies.

Yet others felt that he was a threat to national security - their national security, and therefore their egos.

I disagree with most of his critics - he did not come here to be an angel.

Why the hell had he to come here to be an angel? He was a man.

So no wonder some people would want him to be an angel instead of a man.

He lived and died his life as a man, and I guess there is no need to put some stupid label on him.

When I was a kid, I didn´t understand who he was and I thought that his death was a comedy film or something.

Then I realized ´this is a real man, and he really died´.

And then I realized that he had been trying to pursue something I didn´t understand then.

Now the entire human race does.

John F. Kennedy was a very serious person about his job and that job, was to aid humanity in the consciousness shift - and this is termed without any emphasis on new age and ´biased´spiritual concepts.

John F. Kennedy is a very good example of someone who decides to step out of his herd, and use his position and title to do something good for himself, his family, his country´s people, the nation and the world.

John F. Kennedy is an examplar in my opinion of what to be.

If I was John F. Kennedy and I was living today - I´d have chosen to see if I could grant myself another title than that of a politician.

I would realize that I exist somehow seperate from the majority of the world´s overall population of politicians and legislators.

I would realize, that if I want to show to the American people that I was put into office to work for them, I´d do that.

And that is what he did - unquestionably.

Perhaps he would have used another title today than that of a politician because he´d have realized such a title is detrimental to one´s reputation.

Perhaps he´d rather have chosen to term himself a representative of his electors.

There is a big difference between politicians, legislators and ´representatives of their electors´.

A representative of his or her electors is someone who tries to the best of their ability, to represent their electors, and thus it is that those do not need to keep the title ´politician´.

The word itself ´politician´has lost it´s previous, glorious meaning.

Now it means ´a species of animal which looks, behaves and acts like a human being, but which does so opposite and seperate from most of humanity, and in direct contrast with biodiversity´.

Today´s politician is faced with the single greatest threat most politicians have been faced with in the past and that is losing their basic, civil liberties.

They cannot keep civil liberties at the expense of everyone else, and if they want those civil liberties back, if they want our faith back - then they have to make a new start, scrap things up, and start anew.

It´s kinda like a marriage which is started anew to create a new cycle of a realationship between the couple.

Unlike the serial killer, the politician of today who is most corrupt and most infamous operates as the lowest amongst the classes.

During the age of Lenin, Trotsky, Marx, Stalin, Hitler and so on, the politician was at the top.

Now, the most corrupt amongst them remain at the bottom.

Some have said in their error that things like the Federal Reserve ´will be around for a million years´, i.e. George Noory.

I understand George´s remark - the Federal Reserve is stupid.

And I agree with him that we can´t let stupidity be around for a million years.

But unfortunately for the most optimistic amongts us, it can and will.

It is a natural part of our life cycle, because we learn from stupid mistakes.

Consider our Icelandic Geir H. Haarde - he has learnt from his mistakes and announced so repeatedly publicly.

The politician of the present, is no longer a respected citizen.

Even the best and most able amongst them, are mistrusted.

Consider Jan Stoltenberg.

An internet website user can drop an atom bomb on him and his family whose presence and radiation they cannot even feel.

The politician of 10 to 15 years ago was able to bomb my country with any atom bomb they had got left in the artillery of their country, provided those are real, tangible atom bombs.

The citizen of today, can drop an invisible atom bomb, an idea, onto a politician´s table without the politician ever knowing it.

Today, you can commit murder with the use of your voice and get away with it.

There is an internationally recognized and ´unrecognized´population of over 3000 politicians whose species has begun to die out.

There is also an international, unrecognized number of legislators out there whose number must be classified so that it can be brought to light, or else they become an even bigger threat than today.

John F. Kennedy decided to realize that he didn´t need his charisma to be another person than himself - and so he became himself.

And because of that he was a threat to a certain group or certain groups of people who did not wish to be themselves.

And because of that, he attracted them into his environment like a magnet.

With the damage these creatures are doing to the planet, and to it´s ecosystem with things like the creation of animal - human hybrids, humanity is starting to fight back - and now, we have to agree upon that too many of them have had human rights.

John F. Kennedy wasn´t interested in an approax as insatiable as that of myself when it comes to deal with politicians and so on.

He wanted to confront them head - on, and sometimes I do that too - but unlike himself, I am not a president or anything of that title - I don´t need to be right now.

The politician of today, is the lowest amongst the low on the cake - and hold the most of it´s body and those on top of it are falling off one by one, only to be replaced by others unless the baker decides otherwise.

In all the debate the baker was forgotten - he who made the cake in the first place.

John F. Kennedy knew about the baker, and so, it is natural that he´d be shot because other people didn´t like to hear that knowledge and those who did not wish to be themselves and follow their own agendas in full cooperation with the American people collapsed and so they decided to kill Kennedy.

It is thus understandeable why John F. Kennedy was shot - because he wanted to be himself and put an end to the anglo - American oilgarchy, or what some of us have termed The Capitali.

The Capitali simply do not wish you to live in peace with yourself and your environment - that threatens them.

Because of that, removal of the civil liberties of some, perhaps many enough amongst them, will guarantee you a further extent of the responsibility you should have currently towards your own citizenship, your own rights.

John F. Kennedy would probably have termed himself a philosopher rather than a politician today.

Because today´s politics has become so corrupt, that when I realized that all that´s needed is maintainance of control of the overall world population of today´s currently filed and labelled politicians, along the rest of today´s corrupt legislators, and then the rest of that problem would be taken care of.

Slowly, but surely.

John F. Kennedy and such persons appear from time to time - geniuses who lead the way.

I am not saying that he´d have wanted something like this to happen though and I guess that I do support legitimate government.

The point is - I don´t support that people keep human rights at the expense of everyone else who also wish to keep them, and at the expense of nature itself and nature´s ecosystem.

John F. Kennedy died, not only for the truth, and for freedom, but his spirit lives - and our spirits shall live despite our bodies cease to be.

Perhaps his death was a major reminder of the importance that even in the face of untimely death - a single human being can contribute to changes a thousand politicians, legislators and tons of human beings have tried through war and revolution, instead of trying to do it by means of a simple, well defined debate in where different groups of people debate with each other a major important issue.

It just doesn´t make sense to me.