Spiritual Forum

Replies

• 

  Malcolm August 22, 2014 at 9:55am

  People aren't going to like me for this, but I think Karen Hudes is a disinformationist. She is way out in the open too much and is reporting on old news via reverberating the World Bank conspiracy already reported in 2004 by John Perkins in his book "Confessions Of An Economic Hitman." Go to http://www.economichitman.com/ for info on this book.

  Note that Karen Hudes considers Edward Snowden to be a fake disinformationist planted by the U.S. government, and I disagree with this because when Snowden came forward and blew the whistle the mainstream media wouldn't put him on the front page of their newspapers and Time Magazine wouldn't make him "Person Of The Year."  If the mainstream media had made him headline news with 48 point font headlines and was the main story with the television networks (AND HE WASN'T) , I'd be suspicious of Snowden.  But the fact that the mainstream media wouldn't cover him intensely (initially) indicates that he is more than likely the real deal, as our eavesdropping U.S. government would be ordering the main media networks to keep this story low for coverage.  
• 

  Phylos August 22, 2014 at 12:24am

  I can't help from wondering how this seemingly brave woman is still alive.  Maybe because she went public before they could off her?  Maybe she's up to some kind of inside disinfo? don't know...she seems to be on the level.....? 
  • 

    Acute Observer > Phylos August 22, 2014 at 1:28pm

    "Maybe because she went public before they could off her?"
    
    Phil Schneider were public for years and still got off'ed, so that's not it.
    
    
    "Maybe she's up to some kind of inside disinfo?"
    
    The range of the things she discuss certainly suggest that.
    Her earlier profession gave her insight in the economic reality of the world, but it did NOT make her an expert on all the other things she's also talking about. She must have gotten that from somewhere else and AFTER she left her trade, whereas that part of the message can NOT be construed as "whistle blowing" but rather "controlled opposition".