What is the difference? which is the best or most accurate?
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Latest Activity
"Lol @ 3.25 until the end. That fast felt great! I even fit in a workout.😋"
"AE...It could be worse, luckily Dr Smith isn't a stowaway on the trip...🤪
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-OIN8k5ZM4"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-OIN8k5ZM4"
"Orion space craft, crewed lunar flyby....More amazing shots of the Earth, as departing and expected of the moon, as the astronauts get closer...Plus some extra vehicular shots, too........🌕...I'll post more tomorrow, of the moon..…"
                                           III                                THE CURRENT OF SOUNDTo understand is something immediate, direct, something we experience…
"I believe that the great majority of Iranians living in the UK, are anti-IRGC, as exiles from Iran, or the children of such exiles...since 1979, onwards..Many are non-muslims, as well....In fact, Mayhar Tousi is christian, for example..
However, if…"
However, if…"
"Iranians in Britian are going to fight for the IRGC-WTH?"
"I'm an ED-I've seen some very bizarre people over the years"
"I wonder if religious types, people brought up in some form of church conditioning about "reality," realise that demons can exist offworld, as well as onworld...?? They are not always ETs..And Earth human beings, with limited consciousness can…"
                                           III
                                THE CURRENT OF SOUND
To understand is something immediate, direct, something we…
Replies
Its all the same except at the level in wich the individual bringing forth the information has ingrained the info. The less ingrained that info and energy is within the person the more trauma can be caused be allowing a being to bring it through although it has its urgency and importance at times. sometimes that info serves a higher purpose to just come through even at some expense to the individual. that channel has a contract(agreement) to do so. They could also learn this info in a gradual ascension fomated way wich is much more important but this is also the real point to the information being channeled. keylontics is the science of becoming that channeled being that channels from source for themselves this info. You are a channel for yourself( the self). It is more important i believe to not skip the gun an become someone you are not and gradually just become your true self. I mean, just because a channel is supposedly holding another being within them. does that make the info more believable?
Keylontics is a mixture of science and spirit ..something man is yet to fully understand!
Yes and no!..lol but more on the yes side!..lol
I like Bashar and he has radically changed since he started this (cant you tell..lol) I like all of his info and none of it is even remotely challenged as much as all the other channelers (sp) . I know telepathy is like receiving a mind wave of thought as opposed to letting the being enter you.I guess it depends on the being, but Darryl says Bashar IS HIM SO its safe i guess for him
Yea!! she talks 100mph but when she finally gets to it, her info is fascinating! I hope other Ashtar crew members are aware of what she's saying, I do remember her saying the earth was going to to a Kelly Ramer "step back" (not sure on the spelling) but this is TOTALLY DIFFERENT than what we are talking about in ascension, and she seems very very legit doesnt she?
Glad you could drop by Philosoraptor!..I saw a project camelot show with Ashyana Deane and she was speaking about the dangers of channeling and that she receives her messages keylontics style!. she did say that channeling was dangerous and that it also damages the persons DNA. She has great material by the way!
the key difference that effects the accuracy and the assessment thereof with each of these modalities is the audience..you.
enjoy
loved