NASA forced to deny UFO claims after 'alien spacecraft' is spotted orbiting asteroid
Irish Mirror
January 31, 2015
Sky-watchers are in no doubt that it does, saying the picture of asteroid 2004 BL86 taken by NASA's Deep Space Network clearly shows a diamond-shaped craft.
Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlINecc-WXY&feature=player_embedded for video of UFO with the named asteroid.
However, the space agency has offered a more rational explanation, revealing that the asteroid had its own moon - something they say is extremely common.
A NASA spokesman said: "In the near-Earth population, about 16% of asteroids that are about 655 feet or larger are a binary (the primary asteroid with a smaller asteroid moon orbiting it) or even triple systems (two moons)."
Website UFO Sightings Daily wrote: "This asteroid has a UFO flying in orbit around it. We can see from the detailed photo that the craft is diamond shaped and flat.
"NASA of course goes on to say that this flat object which does not flip over end is a moon.
"Any moon this thin would be tumbling end over end. This object is keeping itself steady, flying like a ship would in space".
https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/shutterstock_1849400320-e1702642079804.jpg 810w" alt="Featured Image" />
Replies
I know, I know, moon's are SQUARE.
ANDROMEDAN: thanks for clarification. A little expansion in wording and clarification always prevents others from assuming the worst based on the little wording and nebulous writing per replies from others. I do this from a big computer keyboard, and not an IPhone or Android cigarette case. And yes, I do have a chip on my shoulder thanks to retired NASA employees who have nothing better to do with their free time except debate the UFO community about the verbatim meaning of "UFO" (i.e. it's an Unidentified Flying Object).
And USO - unidentified submerged object.
ANDROMEDAN: "little to this??" Any self-proclaimed expert or cynic can label any photo or interview as a question mark regarding appearance, just as any food critic can label beef stew as being dog sh!t (per appearance).
You are welcome to your cynicism and doubt, and I am extraordinarily sorry you are not Steven Hawkins offering me $10 million to prove this photo as being real. You are not the first ET cynic encountered by myself and many in the UFO community (ESPECIALLY IN NEW MEXICO) and certainly not the last. Sorry to say, but it is your right to include yourself in a group of skeptics who will probably never be satisfied with any form of media or any tangible evidence of ET's in our environment, unless you have a real ET standing next to you (and is also willing to undergo a DNA test for authenticity, since appearances can be deceiving).
NASA's reputation for being untruthful with ET matters caught on their own filming is legendary, and hence that alone proves NASA is full of sh!t a majority of the time when these matters are brought up. If you or NASA can demonstrate that this is a rectangle satellite moon, I welcome your evidence. I say it's a craft, and most people I showed this to said the same thing.
By the way, I don't need to "keep on digging." Many former NASA employees have labeled NASA's reputation for dishonesty with ET media catches as being so low that it can crawl under a pregnant ant.