NASA forced to deny UFO claims after 'alien spacecraft' is spotted orbiting asteroid
Irish Mirror
January 31, 2015 


Sky-watchers are in no doubt that it does, saying the picture of asteroid 2004 BL86 taken by NASA's Deep Space Network clearly shows a diamond-shaped craft.
8110975288?profile=original
8110975092?profile=original
Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlINecc-WXY&feature=player_embedded for video of UFO with the named asteroid. 

However, the space agency has offered a more rational explanation, revealing that the asteroid had its own moon - something they say is extremely common. 

A NASA spokesman said: "In the near-Earth population, about 16% of asteroids that are about 655 feet or larger are a binary (the primary asteroid with a smaller asteroid moon orbiting it) or even triple systems (two moons)." 

Website UFO Sightings Daily wrote: "This asteroid has a UFO flying in orbit around it. We can see from the detailed photo that the craft is diamond shaped and flat. 

"NASA of course goes on to say that this flat object which does not flip over end is a moon. 

"Any moon this thin would be tumbling end over end. This object is keeping itself steady, flying like a ship would in space".

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I know, I know, moon's are SQUARE.

  • ANDROMEDAN: thanks for clarification. A little expansion in wording and clarification always prevents others from assuming the worst based on the little wording and nebulous writing per replies from others. I do this from a big computer keyboard, and not an IPhone or Android cigarette case. And yes, I do have a chip on my shoulder thanks to retired NASA employees who have nothing better to do with their free time except debate the UFO community about the verbatim meaning of "UFO" (i.e. it's an Unidentified Flying Object).  

    • And USO - unidentified submerged object. 

  • ANDROMEDAN: "little to this??" Any self-proclaimed expert or cynic can label any photo or interview as a question mark regarding appearance, just as any food critic can label beef stew as being dog sh!t (per appearance).

    You are welcome to your cynicism and doubt, and I am extraordinarily sorry you are not Steven Hawkins offering me $10 million to prove this photo as being real. You are not the first ET cynic encountered by myself and many in the UFO community (ESPECIALLY IN NEW MEXICO) and certainly not the last. Sorry to say, but it is your right to include yourself in a group of skeptics who will probably never be satisfied with any form of media or any tangible evidence of ET's in our environment, unless you have a real ET standing next to you (and is also willing to undergo a DNA test for authenticity, since appearances can be deceiving).

    NASA's reputation for being untruthful with ET matters caught on their own filming is legendary, and hence that alone proves NASA is full of sh!t a majority of the time when these matters are brought up. If you or NASA can demonstrate that this is a rectangle satellite moon, I welcome your evidence. I say it's a craft, and most people I showed this to said the same thing. 

    By the way,  I don't need to "keep on digging." Many former NASA employees have labeled NASA's reputation for dishonesty with ET media catches as being so low that it can crawl under a pregnant ant.

    8110966461?profile=original

This reply was deleted.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"200% agreed. Thank God the only threat left is the primitive cabal. They think they are tough, but they honestly can't be taken seriously lol."
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes, with great power comes great responsibilities, as they say and we must all protect and cherish our beloved Kashira galaxy, and ensure that we never have to go to cosmic wars, again..."
2 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"That is a scary scary weapon. I don't think it will ever happen again not in this galaxy, but lets hope these weapons are never used again. These things are way to powerful."
2 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes, both, depending on the size, or as nuclear science might suggest, the yield...It goes further than even nuclear war, as it causes the forms of sentient beings to be destroyed, of course, but also their aetheric forms...the twin upon the mirror…"
2 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"I believe you mentioned the pralaya bomb before on here. I think it was said that weapon can destroy an entire star system. That or it could destroy an entire planet. One of the two was said."
3 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Well, as we are seeing with ground battles on this world, now, the more advanced the tech, the less able armies are to operate, like infantry and the "grunts" of tradition, as they are easily targeted by satellite directed drone and missile…"
3 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"Last question Drekx since I might be asking a little to many at the moment lol, but I have always wondered what the cosmic wars would have looked like. How were these battles fought? I would imagine with the advanced tech each side had they would…"
3 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Certainly they have....in the cosmic wars, the Anunnaki often served alongside the Anchara side...and had many disagreements with Earth's spiritual hierarchy...And throughout Earth's pre and post-flood history, there was always that opposition…"
3 hours ago
More…