Spiritual Forum

 so i have been reading on here a lot and what i have noticed is a lot of typical notions about good and evil, light and dark. the posters of these messages seem to often take a rather unbalanced approach to the matter. Good and Evil are not so easily defined as things that inspire fear and anger and animosity in regards to evil or Peace, love, unity and respect in regards to good. to perceive them as such is a human trapping and limitation, they are nothing more than two sides to the same coin. by viewing things in such limiting terms the entire spectrum of possibility is limited to utter simplicity. furthermore no actions are defined strictly by a narrow wavelength of said simplicity.

Good and Evil are tools. they are simplified explanations created to control the minds of the weak, and thereby limit freewill. morality is utterly subjective to circumstance, what is good in one situation is bad in others E.G. the role of the assassin can save countless lives by eliminating a source of conflict before it has the ability to act, as well as it can render the hope for a new future before it can blossom. The source is not simply the origin of all light, but it is also the origin of darkness. the two exist in dynamic equilibrium and bring each other in to being. it is only a matter of perspective as to which side one is on at any given moment, and it is the to victor that often the hero's role is granted.

we should be beyond these limitations. by acting out of what is perceived to be righteousness one can easily become as corrupt as the blasphemer they abhor. no one is one sided, only by embracing both sides of ones nature can they exercise freewill. it requires knowledge of both to be liberated from their constraints. furthermore evil is not with out redemption, as all living things seek out what they feel is the truth of their being. Often Evil comes in the form of the adversary, it is through this that we gain purpose.

Furthermore from a dogmatic perspective we are playing the role of the Adversary. Shai'tan (satan) is a challenger of conventional order and an instrument of transition and change. we are acting in the same role against conventional society. we arent the hero's here. we are an occupying force, and thus fundamentally adversarial to conventional order, which to those who adhere to the modus operandi that we oppose are in fact heretics and evil by our very claim to be "OTHER" - or whatever you so wish to call yourself, ETI, Alien, Pleidain, Angel etc. We represent the very essence of the nameless stranger. If i we were given the power to do exactly as it is that we feel is correct at the scale we wish to do so, we would be terrifying to those who resist change. Our vision of the future is the enemy of many, many other peoples vision of the future. 

Evil can be both change, which in truth may very well be positive, and it may also be the stagnation of a system that believes itself to be perfect. True evil as i recognize it bureaucracy, and mindlessly following without questioning. If you indeed feel you are a messenger here, than the approach is by nature scientific, and though we have the goals of the spirit as an end result it is crucial to take a scientific approach. Often times Good can be highly disruptive, and Evil is warm and Inviting. Both need to be weighed and analyzed carefully before acting, other wise you are simply reactionary and likely to be fooled and misdirected.

If you find my ideas challenging to your paradigm, well then all i can respond is Good. that means i am doing my job. However it is not my intention to create conflict, i am simply trying to instruct. The Role of Messengers is to be neutral, the experiment is to gauge the ability to achieve ascension. This has historically been our task sense we have arrived here, the nature of the schism among our ranks, and the question we have been tasked to answer.

in all honesty i feel the experiment is an utter failure, or a complete success depending on how you view it, and what your interests are. in simple terms, you can throw pearls before swine but they will never appreciate it. We have been trying for aeons to make progress, but like a student unwilling to open a book, we have made absolutely none. in spite of technological advancement, humans have made no progress in thought as a collective, and have been as little more than sheep the entire time. while some struggle with the concepts that have been provided for advancement, as a whole they are barely out of woods. with out our help, they would still be there. so i think it is futile to civilize them. They have no concern for abstract reasoning, or higher though, and most even highly educated members of the populace are completely incapable of it altogether.

Its time to abort mission and separate the wheat from the chaff. We must focus on our own kind now, and prepare for the coming storm. Humans dont exist in harmony with nature, because our Influence pulls them out of Harmony.One of the Original " Alien" stories is that of the Grigori or the Watchers, angels that came from heaven and gave unto man the forbidden knowledge, with that knowledge they were able to craft weapons and armor, and form vast civilizations, to wage war, and participate in agriculture, it also removed them from nature. without our influence, they will return to where the came, squatting in the dirt, and in harmony with the earth. In other words it will mark a return to Eden, a return to innocence.

It is the very presence of knowledge and the potential for ascension that causes disruption, even without socio-economic stratification, there would be an elect, and thus hierarchy determined by intellect, instituting a meritocracy. of course some could argue that the capitalistic ooligarchy is an intellectual and academic elite, and the nature of the divide in class is a matter of intellectual capacity that is unequally distributed among the classes, as if one is truly intelligent they will succeed in any environment and that the difficulty in attaining higher levels of influence will only make stronger leaders or simply not be concerned with material gain.  nature does a good job of distributing intelligence statistically among populations, its never enough that it totally disrupts the system, but just enough that it gives those who possess it an edge.

I surmise that this trait in of itself isnt even natural to humans and that this is all our system, from politics to religion. they are are all institutions of control designed to keep the sheep in the pasture, they are specifically designed for control, it keeps them from destroying us, so we can do our research on them. thats why we take these forms in the first place, to do research. you cant get an unbiased perspective of the human experience when you look like, well how we really look.

so in conclusion, it would be wise to strongly consider the usage of loaded terms like good and evil, they are unbecoming of our kind. Look more closely at duality and the look for other options. by placing things into a narrow box we are skewing our results by placing intentions on them. the only way to gain valuable data is through non-attachment. this is one of the noble truths. desire leads to suffering, and both good and evil sway karma. rise above that and we will return home, or build a new one here, forget that fact, and you are as useful as a human to our mission, research material.

~kuja the raven~