We found out that the Queen's direct blood line goes all the way back to the Imperial Line of the Caesars (and potentially much further back than that). 

My question is why haven't I ever heard anyone tell me about this before? I have been researching conspiracies, history, and all things weird for a very long time, and never heard about this in a direct specific manner.

Here is a link that shows five routes of lineage from Queen Elizabeth II to Julia Caesar, the sister of Julius.


Julia to Elizabeth

Here is a helpful family tree diagram that covers a large portion of the lineage that goes back to Charlemagne.

German family tree

But this isn't how I discovered this information originally, I came across all of this entirely randomly by complete coincidence by browsing through Wikipedia, I will show exactly how this occurred.

Elizabeth II's father was George VI, 
whose father was GeorgeV, 
whose father was Edward VII, 
whose father was Victoria's husband Prince Albert, 
whose father was Duke Ernest I, 
whose father was Duke Francis, 
whose father was Duke Ernest Frederick, 
whose father was Francis Josias, 
whose father was John Ernest IV, 
whose father is Ernest I, 
whose father is John II (Johann), 
whose father is John William, 
whose father is John Frederick I, 
whose father was John, 
whose father was Ernst,
whose father was Frederick II, 
whose father was Frederick I, 
whose father was Frederick III, 
whose father was Frederick II, 
whose father was Frederick I,
whose father was Albert II,
whose father was Henry III,
whose father was Theodoric I, 
whose father was Otto II, 
whose father was Conrad the Great,
whose father was Thimo, 
whose father was Dietrich II, 
whose father was Dedo I, 
whose father was Dietrich I von Wettin.

Now I ran into a dead end here, as you can see by reading the Wiki, but I was on the Right Track because it says this:

    Dietrich (ca. 916 – ca. 976), also known as Thierry I of Liesgau, is
    considered the oldest traceable member of the House of Wettin who is known
    for certain. In genealogy, this makes him the top ancestor of various
    present-day nobles, including Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom,
    King Albert II of Belgium and Simeon II of Bulgaria.

Somehow, the night I first looked at this with my wife, we found a connection from Wettin to the main German royalty line through the house of Billung.

However, I forgot how and lost the links to this, and then had to backtrack all of the way back to Albert the Degenerate's wife, Margaret of Sicily.

Now I am back on track.

Margaret of Sicily's father was Frederick II HRE, 
whose father was Henry VI HRE, 
whose father was Frederick I HRE, 
whose father was Frederick II, 
whose father was Frederick I, 
who married Agnes of Germany, the daughter of Henry IV HRE, 
whose father was Henry III HRE, 
whose father was Conrad II HRE, 
whose father was Henry of Speyer,
whose father was Otto von Worms,
whose mother was Liutgarde, 
whose father was Otto I HRE, 
whose father was Henry I the Fowler, 
whose mother was Hedwiga, 
whose mother was Ingeltrude, 
whose mother was Gisela, 
whose father was Louis the Pious, 
whose father was Charlemagne, 
whose father was Pepin the Short, 
whose father was Charles Martel,
whose mother was Alpaida.

This is where the Wiki trail ends, but with a little Google research I found a genealogy chart where Alpaida's family is listed. 

She is listed as Elphide (Chalpaida) in this source, but if you check her son, it's Charles Martel. 
If you check her father however, Childebrand, it's a dead end again.

So back to her page, now check Pepin II, his father was Ansigise Meroving. 

His mother was Clothilde, 
whose father was Arnoldus XXVII, 
whose father was Ausburtus,
whose father was Ferrolus Auvergne, 
whose father was Sigimerus I, 
whose father was Clodius "Long Haired", 
whose father was Pharamond, 
whose father was Marcomir I, 
whose father was Clodius of the Franks, 
whose father was Dagobert, 
whose father was Genebald,
whose father was Dagobert of the Franks, 
whose father was Walter, 
whose father was Clodius III, 
whose father was Bartherus,
whose father was Hilderic,
whose father was Sunno, 
whose father was Farabert,
whose father was Clodimir IV,
whose mother was Althildis,
whose father was "Old King" Coel, 
whose father was Marius King of Britain,
whose mother was Venus Julia Claudius, 
whose father was Tiberius Claudius Caesar Brittanicus, 
whose father was Roman Emperor Claudius.

Now I have found some slight errors or mistakes in the Roman Emperor's family tree, so it can become really confusing. Here is a link to a very incomplete family tree: Complete mess of Roman royalty.

Notice that Claudius's son Tiberius Claudius Brittanicus is missing. However, I believe I have filled those gaps in this search.

Also notice that Marius's spouse was the daughter of Boadicea. Boadicea is very famous - please read up on her historical significance.

Now if you go back to the other website, and go to Boadicea and go back several more generations you will end up at a person named 

"Aed Mawr, which is the furthest back I can trace in this particular direction. His son was named
"Aedd Prydain (Brydain)" which is supposedly where the name "Britain" came from. (?)

I did a google search on this Aedd Mawr character and this is what I came
up with:

Aedd Mawr Pedigree

Please take 10 minutes and read through that Pedigree, there are some bizarre findings within it. I am sure you will find some explosive claims within that will blow your mind.

So I then checked out "Where is this source from?", it is listed as ""Magna Charta" ["MC"], by John S. Wurts (1942), page 158; with commentary by David Hughes". 

I wondered what is the "Magna Charta? I have heard of the Magna Carta but what is this strange spelling??" — What I found made my jaw drop.

I did a search and found this: Baronial Order of Magna Charta

    The Baronial Order of Magna Charta (BOMC) was founded in 1898 as The
    Baronial Order of Runnemede during the flowering of scholarly and popular
    interest in the history and development of the Anglo-Saxon people that
    characterized the final decades of Queen Victoria’s reign. For over a
    century BOMC has been a leading proponent organization whose purpose is the
    promulgation and support of the principles set forth in that
    world-pervasive document — the Magna Charta.

Ok, this is really odd. So keep reading.

    The Order has been incorporated in the State of Pennsylvania as a
    non-profit corporation since 1945, and is also registered with the IRS as a
    501(c)(3) tax exempt organization. Individuals of good character who can
    prove descent from one or more of the 25 Sureties who were responsible for
    holding King John to the terms of the Great Charter he signed on 15 June
    1215 at Runnymede meadow in England and five counselors of the King who
    were in sympathy with the Magna Charta will be considered for
    membership.

What are the 25 Sureties? Read the wiki on Surities.

Let's skip ahead a bit. Check this part out:

    The Magna Charta resulted from the peace made between King John of
    England and about sixty of his rebelling barons. After preliminary
    negotiations with Archbishop of Canterbury Stephen Langton as go-between,
    John and his party met the barons on 15 June at Runnymede meadow next to
    the Thames River. After several days of discussions, the document language
    was finally agreed upon, and on 19 June the barons elected 25 of their
    number as “Sureties” to hold title to certain of the king’s properties,
    including the Tower of London, in order to guarantee his compliance with
    the laws and liberties expounded in the Magna Charta.

Essentially, the nobility held all of this wealth and property over the King and forced him to comply with this "Compact" (Treaty - not a Contract).

They controlled the Tower of London, which is apparently where the British money was minted
through history among various other important things.

Wiki Magna Carta

Look at this wiki closely — it says clearly how this system works.

    The 1215 Charter required King John of England to proclaim certain
    liberties, and accept that his will was not arbitrary, for example by
    explicitly accepting that no "freeman" (in the sense of
    non-serf) could be punished except through the law of the land, a
    right which is still in existence today.

That's why they are "freemen" and have protections to their rights and we are "serfs" and lack many of these protections. It's written right there. Just look around that website some and you will be perplexed and blown away as I was probably. 

Now, connect this to the US Constitution, here is the full text. 

It says clearly in capitalized words "People" and "Posterity". That applies to the nobility because the King was not adhering to the compact agreed to in the Magna Charta apparently, so that is why these nobles created this document. I do not think it exactly applies to us, the serfs, however. 

Read closely: