Questions Multiply Around Norway Blast and Shootings
Now the theories start on the Norway assaults. Not two, three years later but in little more than a week. Apparently drawing on what we learned from the 9/11 blasts, Karma Singh analyzes the Norway blast and shootings. How could the shooter have travelled to Utoya Island with his arsenal of weapons and not be seen? How did the wreckage of the car survive the explosion? How did a car that could hold only 3/4 of a ton hold six tons? And how could it still be driveable? Why did the police hold a training session shortly before the blast? On and on the questions go. Thanks to Suzan.
Norway and Berlin
by Karma Singh, Harmony Energy Consltants, no date.
http://www.harmonyenergyconsultants.com/web/en/news15.html
I did promise last weekend to give news of further developments in Berlin but “a little something” in Norway got in the way! This little something rivals the events at the World Trade Center, New York in many of its anomalies.
Now, I am not an expert in firearms but there are those who are. These have commented upon the astonishing (their words) ability of almost complete novices to shoot people with a kill rate way above that of a highly trained military sniper. Further, that of more than three hundred people, not one, apparently, made any attempt to stop the “assassin” as most such lone shooters are almost always stopped. Before we go further into this part of the story, however, we do need to take a look at the events earlier that day in Oslo.
At 3.20 on the Friday afternoon a large explosion took place, allegedly next to a government building. Amazingly, for the time of day, there was not one single person in that building; not even a cleaner. Why?
According to the official story, one Anders Breivik Behring purchased six tons of fertiliser out of which he made a huge bomb. He, somehow, managed to pack all this into a car about the size of a Renault Espace which could never have held more than ¾ of a ton of such an explosive and would, in any event, have been completely undriveable with anything like that weight of “luggage”. We see a photo of this car here.
Had this vehicle, however, actually contained a bomb which did so much damage to the building then you would not be seeing a wreck like this; you would find nothing larger than 3 inch (7cm) pieces of metal etc. scattered around the street. You would also see a very large hole where the vehicle had been parked; the pavement appears to be completely undamaged. (Had ½ lb of gelignite been detonated under the vehicle, it would look something like the one in the photo.)
Staying at street level for the moment, we see a car which looks like a Volkswagen Golf size vehicle just a few yards (metres) away from the alleged bomb. Had the bomb really been in a car in front of the building then the Golf size vehicle would have been blown at least 20 yards (metres) through the air. As we can see, however, the only damage to it is from falling masonry from the building itself.
This blast which wrecked six floors of a steel and concrete building, had it been from a bomb in a car in front of the building, would have uprooted the trees on the other side of the road. We see here that they have not even lost a single leaf.
Turning our attention to the building a few yards away on the other side of the road we observe minimal damage whereas the alleged bomb would have almost demolished it.
When we look at the target building we observe a number of strange phenomena. Firstly, although the blast, allegedly, took place at street level we see almost uniform damage from top to bottom of the building. Further, the damage and heat intensity appear to have been much higher on the upper floors. Looking very closely, we note that much of the obvious damage is from the inside outwards as though an explosion or explosions had taken place INSIDE the building. Were this the case, then we would expect to see exactly the window damage to the building opposite that we do see and which would have been so impossible from street level.
Some time before, there was a practice security alert in a nearby building to test exactly this scenario! With events of this kind, this is nothing unusual – the co-ordination is usually tested first.
Let us go now to Mr. Behring and his many weapons. The first we see is a “photo” of him with a high-tech military sniper rifle costing many thousands of dollars. Unfortunately, it is a fake. If you look at his eyes, you will see that he is not looking at the rifle at all but at something further away as though he were completely unaware of the rifle. Photoshopping experts have confirmed that the face has been photoshoped onto what may have been an advertisement from the manufacturer of the rifle.
Now things get really curious:-
Here is a lone man who has just set off a massive bomb walking through the streets loaded down with a large collection of guns and ammunition who gets into a boat which he had previously readied for the task and drives off to an island where he single handedly shoots down more than 60 people.
AND NOBODY SAW HIM!!!!!
It might happen in Rambo films but experts in such things say it’s completely impossible. A minimum of three people shooting would be required to get this amount of killing and some of the witnesses who did survive tell tales of more than one gunman.
Mr. Behring himself has an interesting history including a deep involvement with the Masonic lodges which, in their more secret activities, have often been connected with such events. (Most, if not all, of the US presidents over the last five decades including Obama bin Barak himself have been and are members of the “secret” lodges.) This would, of course, also explain where he got the necessary funding for this operation which would not be within the financial means of most of us and as Mr. Behring himself is by no means a wealthy man…………….
Pictures apparently taken on Tuesday show an apparently completely unconcerned Anders Breivik Behring being transported in a police vehicle either going to or coming from a hearing with a judge held in complete secrecy. The general impression which I, professionally, get of Mr. Behring is a very weak personality who either believes when he is told that he will be a world hero or is subjected to mind control. Either way, his complete unconcern over his future is remarkable. Added to this the fact, disclosed during the week, that Mr. Behring is heavily addicted to drugs and we are further puzzled as to his finances: From wide experience, I can verify that drug addicts do not have any financial resources worth mentioning.
The Question is really, “Why Norway?”
One of the two European countries not subject to the whims and fancies of faceless bureaucrats and their even more hidden puppet masters, which has no national debt and is, therefore, not susceptible to the manipulations of the banking cartel. The other such country is Switzerland into which almost the entire Rothschild family are busily moving their homes. Are the lodges trying to convince the Norwegian people that they would be better off with the “protection” of the Rothschild controlled European “super” police? Is it just a warning to London, Berlin etc. to toe the line or look what could happen to you? Or is another game afoot.
I must wait for further reports before I can answer any of these questions.
One thing is certain, the image presented to the public is very definitely deliberately falsified.
Which brings us to Berlin:
It was widely supposed that there was a plan to detonate some sort of nuclear device at the Berlin Olympia Stadium on the 26th of June at the inauguration of the women’s world football championships.
Possibly due to the enormous publicity, this did not happen. However, it may be that the 26th of June was a feint designed to draw the fire of public attention so that pre-news of the real attack would not find such public acceptance. Be this as it may, we have things to do.
Last week I was in Berlin. The main motorway into Berlin, the E 15 and the A100 pass very close to the stadium; you can, in fact, see the stadium from the motorway. As I drove past there was an unmistakable sensation that a nuclear device is being aimed at the stadium.
Entering Berlin we see on almost every street corner huge posters advertising a sporting event due to take place in the Olympic Stadium ON THE ELEVENTH OF SEPTEMBER!!!!!!
The hallmark of the way in which these people operate is the way in which they simply repeat the same modus operandi over and over again. The World Trade Center in New York was demolished by kiloton size atomic bombs under the towers on the 11th of September 2001. Numbers and dates are important to these people. There are natural cycles which they seek to use to force their agenda. Ten years later to the day is so weird that one can almost say that it would be most strange if there were not some major false flag American organised terrorist attack on that day.
The thing that we have to determine is what to do to prevent it. Certainly widespread publicity before the event will help thwart their aims even if they succeed in bombing the stadium with all those thousands of people in it. I would, however, much prefer to prevent it happening and our entire group is working on this. I will let you know our recommendations as soon as we see a clear plan of action.
http://stevebeckow.com/2011/08/questions-multiply-around-norway-blast-and-shootings/
Replies