Secret DARPA time travel program may hold key to understanding thedeep politics of 9/11
s_objectID='article-options_comment';" title="comments"">28 commentsfalse;" rel="nofollow"">
Subscribe
Wiki: World Trade Center photo on 9/11 demonstrating moleculardissociation
This is the first of a multi-part series on quantum access technologies, their application to the events ofSeptember 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our society.
Ina 2006 paper entitled, “FalseFlag Operations, 9/11, and the Exopolitical Perspective”, Dr.Michael E. Salla identifies five exopolitical factors behind false flagoperations, including the false flag operation of September 11, 2001.Although Dr. Salla identifies exotic scalar weapons as the “fourthexopolitical factor” in false flag operations, his 2006 articledoes not disclose how exopolitically-related factors specifically mayhave played out in the case of 9/11.
Since then, a key whistleblower, Andrew D. Basiago, has emerged with evidence thatsecret U.S. time travel technologies were used as early as 1971 toacquire first-hand documentary knowledge about September 11, 2001 –fully three decades before the horrific events of that fateful day.
Mr.Basiago, a child participant in DARPA’s time travel program, ProjectPegasus, has publicly stated how in 1971 he viewed moving images of theattack on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 that had been obtainedfrom the future and brought back to the early 1970’s.
DARPA is the chief research and development arm of the US military, the Defense AdvancedResearch Projects Agency. DARPA created the precursor to the Internet,“Arpanet,” and has a penchant for trumpeting its advances, such asputting surveillance cameras on the backs of bumblebees and other exoticachievements in military science.
Mr. Basiago claims that DARPA’s secret technical accomplishments go far beyond what it has publiclyacknowledged and that by 1970 DARPA had achieved teleportation-based time travel aswell as advanced electro-optical means of discerning past and futureevents via different technologies that provide quantum access.
Mr. Basiago has described how while serving in Project Pegasus, heviewed moving images of 9/11 at the secured U.S. defense-technicalfacility where they were processed after being retrieved from thefuture, the Aerojet Corporation facility that once stood at the cornerof Bullock Avenue and Leroy Place in Socorro, New Mexico.
According to Mr. Basiago’s whistleblower testimony, DonaldH. Rumsfeld, the sitting U.S. Secretary of Defense on September 11,2001, was the defense attaché to Project Pegasus during the early1970’s, when Mr. Rumsfeld was officially serving as a counselor toPresident Nixon and member of his Board of Wage and Price Stabilization.
In all likelihood, Mr. Rumsfeld, as the defense attaché to ProjectPegasus, would have known about and possibly had control over the dataabout 9/11 derived via “quantum access” and brought back to the early1970’s for analysis by the DARPA research and development program underhis administrative authority.
Mr. Basiago’s eyewitness accountthat Secretary Rumsfeld and others knew about 9/11 decades in advancebecause data about it was gathered via DARPA’s secret time travelprogram unlocks several of the more enigmatic facts in the 9/11literature and may be the key to society’s unraveling of the ultimateaccountability for the false flag operation that took place on September11, 2001.
Examiner.com will explore Mr. Basiago’swhistleblower eyewitness evidence regarding how secret U.S. governmenttime travel technologies relate to 9/11 in future installments of thisseries.
Corroborative evidence of Andrew D. Basiago’s secret U.S. government time travel
Fig. 1-ProjectPegasus.net: Photo of Andrew D. Basiago on Nov. 19, 1863 at Gettysburg Address
This article introduces Examiner.com readers to quantum access evidence inthe form of a time travel artifact that resulted from Andrew D.Basiago’s childhood participation in DARPA’s secret time travel programin the early 1970’s. The ALTA reports and Web Bot technology have identifiedMr. Basiago, an emerging figure in the disclosure movement, as a“planetary whistleblower” based on the global significance of hisrevelations. Exploring this time travel artifact will help establish aframe of reference for Examiner.com readers to better evaluate evidencegathered by quantum access technology and time travel participants likeMr. Basiago.
Corroborative documentary evidence of the veracityof Mr. Basiago’s time travel expeditions on behalf of the U.S.government exists. This documentary evidence consists of a photograph of Mr. Basiago taken at the scene ofU.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s GettysburgAddress on November 19, 1863 after he was teleported to thatlocation in the time-space continuum via DARPA time travel technology.
AndrewD. Basiago at Gettysburg, PA on November 19, 1863 (Gettysburg Address)
Figure1 is the photograph of Andrew D. Basiago as a Project Pegasustime travel participant taken at the site of U.S. President AbrahamLincoln’s Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863, to whichMr. Basiago had been teleported back in time by DARPA.
Mr.Basiago has publicly answered questions about this corroboratingphotographic evidence of his time travel experiences in the secret U.S.government program in which time travel was achieved.
Q: Is this [Figure 1] the photo of you on November 19, 1863?
Andrew D. Basiago: Yes. I am the boy standing inthe foreground of the image at center-left, looking to his right. Myshoes were lost in the transit through the quantum plenum that took mefrom the plasma confinement chamber at the time lab in East Hanover, NJin 1972 to Gettysburg, PA on the day that Abraham Lincoln gave hisfamous address there in 1863. When I walked into downtown Gettysburg,where the shops were, after walking into town along the north-southarterial that led into Gettysburg, a cobbler by the name of JohnLawrence Burns accosted me and took me inside a millinery shop andfurnished me with a pair of men's street shoes and a Union winter parkathat he took from a stack of military clothing in a storeroom at theback of the shop. In this image, one can see how over-sized the shoeswere. I can confirm that this image was taken right after PresidentLincoln arrived on the dais, because when I walked over to this locationand stood in this manner to detract attention from my shoes, I had beenstanding over by the dais, and Lincoln had not yet arrived, and I onlystood in this position for several minutes before the quantum fieldeffect produced by the plasma confinement chamber ended and I foundmyself back in the time lab in New Jersey.
Q: This is incredible,Andrew! I did not know there were pictures. Was this a picture (Figure1) discovered that just happened to have you in it, or was this picturetaken by those with you and you brought it back?
Andrew D. Basiago: To my knowledge, this was theonly photograph that was taken in a past or future time when I was timetraveling for DARPA's Project Pegasus. I think another breakthrough willcome in the form of accounts from residents of Santa Fe [New Mexico]about children suddenly appearing at the state capitol complex there inthe early 1970's. Our arrivals were sometimes witnessed. Several of myown arrivals were witnessed. I have spoken with area residents who knewthat individuals were teleporting into Santa Fe in the early 1970's.Some of that knowledge resulted from the arrival of teleportees,including myself, being seen by others; other knowledge resulted fromthe fact that employees of LANL [Los Alamos National Laboratory, LosAlamos, NM] were bringing stories about the teleportation that was goingon home from work and sharing them with their children around thedinner table in Los Alamos and White Rock.
Q: What were youlooking at [in the photograph in Figure 1]?
Andrew D. Basiago: Nothing, intentionally. I waswearing a hodgepodge of clothes: the Union bugle boy uniform that I hadbeen issued back in East Hanover, NJ in 1972; the Union winter parkathat Burns had outfitted me in when I walked into town shivering in thebrisk autumn air; the huge men's shoes that he gave me when I walkedinto town barefoot. When I walked over to the dais, several women weregossiping about me (presumably, because I was apparently a bugle boyseparated from his regiment or a carpetbagger). I was questioned by twoUnion officers about where my regiment was bivouacked. I also had astrange encounter with my father, who was dressed as a Pennsylvaniafarmer and standing in front of the dais, in which he intentionallyignored me. He later said that encountering me there at Gettysburg washow he found out I was going to be in the program. But he was startledto see me and not expecting me to be there, [he] acted like he didn'tknow who I was. After I was questioned by the two Union officers, I wasconcerned that I should make myself inconspicuous. We had been trainedto avoid being conspicuous, being questioned, being arrested, beingdetained, and so on, because these things might create complicationsthat would prevent us from getting back to the present. So,self-conscious about the huge shoes that I was wearing and trying toavoid being further noticed, I walked about 100 paces from the dais andstood with my back to the dais looking in the opposite direction fromwhere I knew Lincoln would be arriving. I hoped that by affecting an airof non-chalance in this manner, I would avoid further scrutiny by thosepresent. It didn't work! I ended up becoming the first time travelerfrom the future to be photographed!
Q: Whywould the US take part in 9/11?
Andrew D. Basiago: What Iknow is that in the early 1970's, Project Pegasus had moving images ofone of the planes hitting one of the Twin Towers on 9/11; that 9/11 wasknown and spoken of by project principals; and that the defense attacheto Project Pegasus was Donald Rumsfeld, the individual who was servingas Defense Secretary during 9/11. The evidence from Project Pegasusshows that the US government knew about the 9/11 attacks many years inadvance, not necessarily that it "took part" in those attacks.
Q:If Project Pegasus knew about 9/11 before it would happen, whywasn't 9/11 prevented from occurring?
Andrew D. Basiago:That's a good question. What I know is that it was the consensus of theUS officials administering Project Pegasus that information about futureevents should be used to engage in contingency planning for futureevents but not to "play God" and change the future by preventing oraltering future events. A paradox exists such that acting to changefuture events based on prior knowledge of them results in diminishedaccurate knowledge of future events. So, there is an institutionalreluctance to change future events based upon prior knowledge of thembecause of the impact of doing so on the quality of the intelligencedatabase concerning future events.
Q: How much informationabout the future has Project Pegasus learned about?
AndrewD. Basiago: My experiences in Project Pegasus indicate that by 1970, theUS government was using chronovision to capture remotely and record onfilm a vast amount of footage of past and future events. When we visitedthe project location at Flemington, NJ -- where I was shown remoteimages of the signing of the US Constitution in 1787 and saw GeorgeWashington and Benjamin Franklin as they appeared in life -- we couldsee that the technicians there were filming reams and reams of scenes ofpast events on 16 mm film stock and storing it in film canisters.Presumably, this process is done digitally today.
Q: IsProject Pegasus still active?
Andrew D. Basiago: I do notknow whether Project Pegasus is still active, but the intelligenceinfrastructure that evolved from it is in all likelihood very active atthis time. Project Pegasus was a small, highly secret research anddevelopment program launched in the late 1960's. However, thetechnologies that it developed gave the US government the keys to pastand future events. My guess is that the quantum access capabilities thatProject Pegasus provided the US government are now headquartered atsome form of national intelligence center that provides the President,the intelligence community and the military information about futureevents.
Q: Was just the military involved or was thegovernment also involved?
Andrew D. Basiago: Project Pegasuscombined individuals employed by the US military (Navy, DARPA), the USintelligence community (CIA) and civilian defense contractors (e.g.,Parsons). It was a research and development program of the US Departmentof Defense (DoD).
Q: How could a father actually put his sonthrough all of these violent and possibly fatal transportationexperiments?
Andrew D. Basiago: It is my position that myfather and I were proud to serve our country during its hour of maximumdanger and were also privileged to be involved in America's earlyactivities in time-space exploration. My father did not involve me inProject Pegasus. Rather, we were approached by the US government andtold we had to be involved for reasons that remain a mystery. In alllikelihood, we were identified by project personnel from the future, whoknew from the perspective of their time that we had been involved inthe program, and hence we were brought into the program to create thefuture program that had knowledge of our past involvement.
Q: Whywas not an adult the one transported so that the information broughtback might be more precise?
Andrew D. Basiago: Children wereinvolved for five main reasons. First, we were experimental testsubjects into the physical and mental effects of teleportation onchildren. Second, we were necessary participants because the hologramsproduced by the chronovisors would collapse if adults were involved andso small, cooperative, intelligent human beings were needed as the timetravelers in the chronovisor probes, and therefore a decision was madeto involve gifted and talented American school children. Third, we wereregarded as better participant-observers of the past and future eventsaccessed in the program because children are tabula rasa --blank slates whose perceptions are not skewed by the selection biasproduced by their previous experiences. Fourth, we were trainees whowere expected to become America's first generation of "chrononauts" in afully fledged time-space program when we grew up. Fifth and lastly, theDepartment of Defense found that when adults were involved in timetravel, the psychologically destabilizing effects of moving betweenalternate time lines was causing some adult time travelers to becomeinsane, so it was hoped that by training time travelers from childhood acompetent cadre of US time travelers could be formed.
Q: Howcould a child possibly be put through all of this and also remembereverything he saw or even understand what he saw or heard?
AndrewD. Basiago: I am a gifted individual with exceptional powers ofobservation and memory. These gifts were identified when I was beingtrained in Project Pegasus. In one test, I recited back random numbersprovided to me verbally to 84 places. I was identified as the futurewhistle blower about Project Pegasus even while I was still serving onthe project. I have spent over 10 years investigating my experiences andproving them to an historical certainty. I am an individual who didremember what I saw and heard, so it is not valid to say that I couldn'thave done so because a child couldn't or shouldn't have been able to.That involves the fallacy of using the general to refute the specific. Inot only remembered much of what I saw and heard, but I later wrote itdown and went back and investigated it and proved my memories.Consequently, I am now able to provide an insider's account of the USgovernment's time-space program at the time of its emergence in the late1960's and early 1970's
MY views is that they pinched this technology from the wing makers please go to www.wingmakers.com about future gazing.....they can see the event but not participate in it....
Replies
I have a feeling the people working on this project Pegasus were all very much on a need to know basis and had no idea of who they were really working for and why. The reason they were sent into the future to 2001 was probably to see if their plan would actually work.
hey Reanne, great question! according to many time travel theorists/ and certain physicists, the future isn't a fixed thing, but has something like, infinite possibilities! i think String Theory addresses this. i don't know how to upload youtube vids yet, or i'd post Michio Kaku's (sp?) segment on string theory and time travel. (search it if you get a chance! the guy is a tad eccentric, but brilliant and entertaining!)
i think it has to do with the future being crammed full of alternating probabilities ~as you've mentioned~ so, if you were to "time travel" to one version of the future, it kinda isn't "the future", but rather "one of many possible futures"! ~fun!~