Spiritual Forum

Some People say They’ve Been Injured by Neuroweapons. Should We Believe Them?

by Robert L. Kinney III | Lifesite
September 3rd 2024, 6:40 am

A secretly operated remote weapon which causes falling and several other effects has been available and advertised to police and other law enforcement since at least 2006.
(LifeSiteNews) — Consider the following scenario: multiple reports describe people strangely losing their balance and feeling almost as if an invisible force had made them fall backwards. Some of the reports include other symptoms like confusion, visual disturbances, sharp, sometimes pin-pointed pain which randomly re-locates, and an overall feeling of disorientation. Most of the reports appear to be trustworthy although some are difficult to determine. Some report the phenomena in a hysterical way, but you determine that the hysterical reporting in and of itself does not necessarily discredit the source. Thinking about it a moment, you realize that if you experienced such phenomena, you might also report them or describe them in a hysterical way.

You assume the cause of the phenomena is not spiritual, supernatural, or of demonic origin; thus, as an inquiring person, you begin searching for scientific phenomena like chemicals and/or technologies which could cause such an effect. Diseases are ruled out as potential causes; for this scenario, we’ll say that those who reported the phenomena were also normally aware of their brain and physical state.

During your literature research, you discover the technologies described by scientists as “directed energy weapons” which use radiofrequency waves, microwaves, millimeter waves, or similar scientific phenomena to remotely, silently, and invisibly cause several of the effects (loss of balance, pain, confusion) described in the trustworthy reports as well as other harmful effects like visual disturbances, hearing problems, etc.

Continuing your search along these lines, you try to determine who would make and who could purchase such directed energy weapons. You discover that a major, reputable, and significantly government-funded arms manufacturer has developed a weapon which can be operated secretly and “shoots” invisible and silent millimeter waves that cause several of the described effects on the human body. Additionally, you discover that a separate company developed a similar, handheld, technology that can be used from over a mile away from the targeted person.

Then you discover that a handheld form of this weapon was developed almost 20 years ago and was openly marketed and advertised to police, the FBI, and other law enforcement entities. You search endlessly for confirmation that law enforcement owns and uses such technologies, but discover only that entities like the FBI and local police are allowed (or, rather, they allow themselves) to keep their technologies, methods, and employees secret.

Power up with Nitric Boost that’s now 40% OFF! This potent formula gives you the massive edge in strength and superior circulation for that unparalleled performance you've been looking for!

Thus, about the only information you have is the above: the weapons were available and ready for use at least 20 years ago and advertised to police by a large company which manufactures arms for the military, and so on. What are some reasonable conclusions?

First, you think a minute and realize that a company would not openly advertise a technology to police and the FBI if that technology were illegal. Thus, you conclude that the technology should at least presumed to be (even if wrongly) legal.

Then you think about the type of people who work for local police and the FBI: the macho-man (or wannabe macho-man) and whichever kind of woman who, like the macho man, would say something like: “Man, this is cool. Never seen it, but I’d love to be like one of those Star Wars folks. I could knock people over and hurt them from a mile away with invisible and silent guns which shoot at the speed of light? Let’s buy 1,000,000 for the government, and I’ll borrow one for myself.”

You eventually realize that in many, if not most, professions there are people who could not possibly keep such technologies secret if they knew co-workers were using them. Thus, you conclude that while it is likely that the FBI and/or local police probably do use the silent and invisible directed energy weapons which were at one time advertised to them publicly, it is unlikely that they let many employees know about them. In fact, you conclude that such weapons would probably most often be used by those who live near a targeted person or are otherwise able to secretly get close to a targeted person.

In other words, undercover or secret police employees and their bosses are probably among the only people to know about the weapon. The other people likely to know about the weapon, of course, are the unfortunate targets of good physical and mental health who experience the strange effects.

Here you make an important conclusion: if such invisible and silent weapons are going to be prevented from future use, it will require listening to those who suggest they might have been hurt by them – even if those self-identifying victims are somewhat hysterical in their books or other reports.

Going further, you conclude it to be possible that the government might even plant false news stories claiming that police and other law enforcement have never used those technologies, or that the technologies were too large to be carried around, or some other propaganda to make Americans feel safe and as if the technologies were not used on them.

Thus, at this point in your research and thinking, you conclude that, at minimum, a secretly and remotely operated directed energy weapon is one possible cause of the trustworthy reports of having lost balance while feeling as if a force were pushing him backward and other symptoms described above.

Would those be reasonable conclusions? Or was the thought process described above flawed or even delusional?

This scenario has been presented to you in part because Americans should be committing to memory the fact that such a cause – a secretly operated remote weapon which causes falling and several other effects – has been available and advertised to police and other law enforcement since at least 2006.

The weapons use directed energy, also known as electromagnetic energy. To be specific, the technologies use millimeter wave energy, microwave energy (which can cause brain damage if focused into the skull), or other energy focused onto or “into” a target. Radiofrequency energy might also be used to describe such technologies.

(It is also relevant that microwaves can go through or “see through” walls, as exhibited by this Massachusetts Institute of Technology microwave camera and a similar U.S. government technology; such technology could be combined with directed energy weapons to harm and/or torture a person in their own home, in church, etc., by a person in a secret and remote location. The microwave cameras or other similar radar technology make it possible to see where a person is located in a building and the directed energy weapon can then be aimed at his location.)

There are multiple kinds of directed energy weapons, some not mentioned in this article. One apparently can be operated from over a mile away; some are hand-held, as small as a flashlight and/or pistol. The names of some of these weapons are the Defender, Guardian, and Silent Guardian. Raytheon, the relatively well-known U.S. military contractor, developed the Silent Guardian while a company named Laser Energetics, Inc. developed the Defender and Guardian. A law enforcement technology journal article from 2009 explains:

The Arizona-based Raytheon developed its ADS [active denial system] Silent Guardian in 2006. According to the company, Silent Guardian Protection System “uses millimeter wave technology to repel individuals without causing injury … without the use of lethal force.” The system sends a focused beam of millimeter wave energy penetrating into the target’s skin. This produces “an intolerable heating sensation” ceasing when the victim leaves the beam.

The statement that the millimeter wave technology is used “without causing injury” is controversial and might be incorrect, although the controversy and contrary evidence is not within the scope of this article. An archived Raytheon listing of the technology from 2006 explains that the Silent Guardian could be used by law enforcement and that “the system is available now and ready for action.”

Related technologies are described in the same 2009 law enforcement technology journal article:

Announced at this year’s [apparently 2009] Memorial Day parade in New York, Laser Energetic’s Dazer Lasers discharge a modulating green beam meant to temporarily impair a threat’s vision, equilibrium, awareness and causes nausea. When hit in the eyes, the effects take place immediately — even penetrating the eyelid if the threat closes his eyes, yet another reaction to aid in controlling the suspect. While the reactions are different, like Silent Guardian, “being dazed” begins to disappear once removed from the beam. Vision impairment and imbalance can last up to 30 seconds while the nausea may last longer.

Impairing “equilibrium” means causing a person to lose balance and potentially fall. Thus, while the weapons are said to be non-lethal, they clearly have the potential to cause death directly or indirectly (for example, causing someone to fall from a lethal height or to develop fatal pneumonia after breaking a hip). Meanwhile, a similar handheld technology was being developed by the U.S. government at approximately the same time. (How many more similar technologies were already developed but not publicized?)

Finally, it is significant that law enforcement technologies used by the FBI or local police may be kept secret; news articles which claim that “these technologies are not available yet” or “no law enforcement entity or police are using these technologies” might be incorrect. Stories about technologies always merely “in development” but not in use are to be expected. Such technologies could be kept secret from the media.

Now, there are several questions to ask here. Is it likely that law enforcement uses secret weapons (ones likely even more advanced and improved than the 2006 or 2009 models mentioned above)? One could reasonably conclude that law enforcement, at very least, might indeed be using the secret, invisible weapons.

The apparent popularity of such technologies – the fact that several different companies and the U.S. government were developing the technologies – and that the technologies were already “available” and “ready for use” in 2006 might suggest that the technology is currently in use.

Another question: Could the weapons mentioned above be described as “neuroweapons,” that is, weapons which affect the brain? Law enforcement and the makers of those weapons apparently do not describe them as such, but they are indeed neuroweapons for they do affect the brain (causing “equilibrium” problems, etc.). Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that the U.S. government, local police, the FBI, and others could be secretly using neuroweapons against Americans. Other countries could also be using such weapons against their citizens.

Still another question: Could such a secret technology be used by government employees to torture someone? The answer is obviously yes, especially when, again, combined with microwave cameras or other radar technologies which see through walls. The torturer could see a person inside their home, church, etc. at any moment, and then use the other technologies to cause severe pain, loss of balance and falling, loss of vision or other visual problems, possibly even aneurysm rupture, and other types of torture. (Triggering an itch through histamine production (page 12) and muscle spasms (page 6) or twitches might be possible with remotely operated and focused electromagnetic energy technology, although advertisements for the specific weapons mentioned above do not mention these possibilities.)

READ: Is the US government pursuing the creation of a biosurveillance regime?

Then, what if a person is a likely target of neuroweapons? For example, say a person was known to be closely followed by law enforcement, and for whatever reason law enforcement employees do not like this person. Say the person experiences one or more of the symptoms described above during separate instances – loss of balance, vision disturbances, the feeling of some sort of force, confusion, brain aneurysm rupture, etc.–when they are sober and otherwise completely healthy. If law enforcement, the FBI, or other entities were to blame for harm to this person, how could he or she receive the justice that is his or her due?

The macho-man type found in law enforcement tends not to, as they say, “snitch,” on others within their group. This is the “blue wall of silence,” having a group dynamic in common with a mafia or a gang. If one member harms someone or commits other crimes, most of the others do not even think about risking becoming unpopular by snitching. Also, obviously, law enforcement employees have weapons – potentially or likely including the secretly functioning weapons mentioned above. Is a law enforcement employee going to blow the whistle on co-workers if he or she knows that the co-workers could covertly retaliate by torturing him or her?

Even further is the problem of how government lawyers would go about prosecuting the people they depend on for what they do. To risk seeming hyperbolic, would a government prosecutor or attorney general go after her chefs, chauffeurs, or bodyguards? Phenomenology and common sense say, “Probably not.”

Still, there is a need for laws which at least attempt to protect citizens from such harm. These laws should be retroactive (in part because, although they are invisible, the above weapons are violent and their use could be torture) in the event that future government employees will do more to provide justice to some harmed by such technologies.

The discussion could continue, but the reader will have got the point: if a person suggests (even hysterically, again, because strange phenomena like feeling an invisible force push one backwards normally cause terror) that they might have been the target of secretly operated invisible and silent neuroweapons, it is reasonable to, at minimum, conclude that such secret weapons used by police or other government entities are a possible cause.