It is in the syntax of the communication where you discover thought process.
And emotional intent.
The language of syntax is very simple.
there are a number of linguistic principles that are always true. And so when you look at syntax you cut throught the subterfuge of the story.
syntax is the language of eloquence.
And it is also the language of the unconscious the tidier your syntax is, the congruent, and coherent you sound.
this is why I believe that the silent treatment should be used as a last resort in conflict resolution. Because when you are fluent in syntax, every sentence that is uttered creates a clearer picture of how that person thinks, and why they say what they say.
t thus gives you the behavioural flexibility you need to better dance with language.
How do you become fluent in the language of syntax?
address your fears
and then, if you treat your conscious mind to an NLP course so that it can learn about syntax, your words can stat to manipulate time and space in profound ways.
Abracadabra..
I create what I speak.
Spaceman > Peter Panayiotis KaranikasFebruary 10, 2013 at 5:48pm
The right amount of words is an individual choice.. but whatever words are used need to be affective.
The intent of the words and the speaker also has a profound affect on the power of the words
to help or to hurt.
Spaceman > Peter Panayiotis KaranikasFebruary 10, 2013 at 4:33pm
Simple bija--- Jewels-- sounds can be very affective.....
what you are describing is what happens when 2 dark (as in not light. not demonic), portions of duality thry to communicate with each other.
it is for the dark regions of our conscious that we model and create behaviours. Because we cannot accurately see what is going on there.
and so we enforce that behaviour because whilst it isn't fantastic, it is a known quantity.
and it gives us a safe, predictable, result.
It services our fear of the dark.
so when someone has conviction in their duality, and you try converse with them, you don't have the behavioral; flexibility to "roll with each others punches".
consciously at least.
the other problem we have s we tend to fill in the blanks we have of other peoples lives with our interpretation of what their life is.
And it is inevitably, incorrect.
As if that isn't bad enough, we then get the shits with them when their life doesn't conform to our interpretaion of it. Hmmm.
There is a wonderful hypnotic intervention called neuro relationship therapy which addresses and organizes the way we unconsciously deal with relationships.
Because when all is said and done, I AM not talking to you.
I AM talking to the version of you that I have created. the version of you that is just like me.
However, when I AM talks with I AM, there can be no confusion.
Because there is no dark.
Spaceman > Peter Panayiotis KaranikasFebruary 10, 2013 at 9:05pm
Thanks peter for your contribution to this discussion
"Yes Both dictators had the same nickname except for Napolean it was more affectionate because he would stay close to his men on the battlefield. Hitler was a runner during WW 1, as you know underground comm lines were blown up and soldiers had to…"
"As for the little corporal Adolf, I believe that Napoleon was also described as such, by his men..."Le Petit Caporal" and especially after the Battle of Lodi, 1796..."
"Queen Catherine de' Medici did offer and provide Michel with her personal protection, being her court astrologer, in effect, yet the risk was still there and why he used codes, in his works...So that's incorrect...and court politics can change a…"
"Nostradamus was not afraid to be taken to an inquisitrion investigation, Catherine de' Medici, the Queen of France (wife of King Henry II), was the royal supporter who protected and admired Nostradamus. She summoned him to Paris in 1555–1556 to draw…"
"Don't ya just love it, when supposed mythology, becomes proven fact....🇮🇳Rama Setu & Dwarka........Yes, they're all real and sometimes assumed fiction, can become discovered fact........The Indian people knew it, in spite of their government…"
"Only a scurrilous scallywag, such as Kier Starmer, would seek to appeal such a just and needed legal verdict, that supports the apt rights of Chagossians........I say, bravo to the ruling....Rule Britannia.....!!🇬🇧🫲🏿🇮🇴🫱🏿🇺🇸…"
"The latest news on the ongoing (light--dark) tug-of-war over Chagos, is great news and will make comrade Xi Jinping, cough on his chop suey flavoured cornflakes...This means the case for British retention of the territories, safeguarding ownership…"
Replies
Thanks for your input devi
It is in the syntax of the communication where you discover thought process.
And emotional intent.
The language of syntax is very simple.
there are a number of linguistic principles that are always true. And so when you look at syntax you cut throught the subterfuge of the story.
syntax is the language of eloquence.
And it is also the language of the unconscious the tidier your syntax is, the congruent, and coherent you sound.
this is why I believe that the silent treatment should be used as a last resort in conflict resolution. Because when you are fluent in syntax, every sentence that is uttered creates a clearer picture of how that person thinks, and why they say what they say.
t thus gives you the behavioural flexibility you need to better dance with language.
How do you become fluent in the language of syntax?
address your fears
and then, if you treat your conscious mind to an NLP course so that it can learn about syntax, your words can stat to manipulate time and space in profound ways.
Abracadabra..
I create what I speak.
The right amount of words is an individual choice.. but whatever words are used need to be affective.
The intent of the words and the speaker also has a profound affect on the power of the words
to help or to hurt.
Simple bija--- Jewels-- sounds can be very affective.....
I was pondering the fact how difficult it is to express feeling with words
there needs to be a higher type of communication ..
that the words often get jumbled and confused in the translation from one brain to another...
what you are describing is what happens when 2 dark (as in not light. not demonic), portions of duality thry to communicate with each other.
it is for the dark regions of our conscious that we model and create behaviours. Because we cannot accurately see what is going on there.
and so we enforce that behaviour because whilst it isn't fantastic, it is a known quantity.
and it gives us a safe, predictable, result.
It services our fear of the dark.
so when someone has conviction in their duality, and you try converse with them, you don't have the behavioral; flexibility to "roll with each others punches".
consciously at least.
the other problem we have s we tend to fill in the blanks we have of other peoples lives with our interpretation of what their life is.
And it is inevitably, incorrect.
As if that isn't bad enough, we then get the shits with them when their life doesn't conform to our interpretaion of it. Hmmm.
There is a wonderful hypnotic intervention called neuro relationship therapy which addresses and organizes the way we unconsciously deal with relationships.
Because when all is said and done, I AM not talking to you.
I AM talking to the version of you that I have created. the version of you that is just like me.
However, when I AM talks with I AM, there can be no confusion.
Because there is no dark.
Thanks peter for your contribution to this discussion
and yes, i realize that you said juggling, not judging.
p.s, anyone who's had sex after, (during :) an argument, knows this to be true.
Namaste.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next