Here's the storey without the echo; Snowden defends the Constitution:

Snowden Defends Fourth Amendment

Michael King
austinchronicle.com
March 10, 2014

In an hourlong conversation live-streamed to SXSW Interactive from an undisclosed location, whistleblower Ed Snowden defended the Constitution, addressed potential protections against mass surveillance, and discussed why he believes he had to leak secret information to public sources.

In a discussion that was somewhat more technical in detail than perhaps anticipated, Snowden was joined by his ACLU attorney Ben Wizner and ACLU technologist Chris Soghoian. The conversation bounced back and forth from policy implications – focusing on protecting the privacy of ordinary citizens from mass government surveillance – to technical matters, particularly what tools might be made available to make users’ data less easily available to government snooping.

Snowden and Soghoian emphasized that privacy can be protected – “encryption works,” Snowden insisted – and argued that precisely because of Snowden’s leaks, major companies have had to improve their security systems, and both companies and officials have begun to push back against overbroad government surveillance.

"Starmer trying to dance around Trump with that 1966 treaty is just ridiculous. It looks like the ultimate stitch-up they didn't count on. I truly wonder if the dark minions can actually survive a US block. 2026 is going to be interesting! ✨♟️"

"Dark Cabal assets in both London and Washington, are trying desperately to prevent Trump and MAGA patriots in the State department, from torpedoing the Chagos stitch-up "deal," in which the UK cedes the Chagos island chain to Mauritius, an ally of…"

Replies

Malcolm March 10, 2014 at 10:54pm

Here's the storey without the echo; Snowden defends the Constitution:

Snowden Defends Fourth Amendment

Michael King
austinchronicle.com
March 10, 2014

In an hourlong conversation live-streamed to SXSW Interactive from an undisclosed location, whistleblower Ed Snowden defended the Constitution, addressed potential protections against mass surveillance, and discussed why he believes he had to leak secret information to public sources.

In a discussion that was somewhat more technical in detail than perhaps anticipated, Snowden was joined by his ACLU attorney Ben Wizner and ACLU technologist Chris Soghoian. The conversation bounced back and forth from policy implications – focusing on protecting the privacy of ordinary citizens from mass government surveillance – to technical matters, particularly what tools might be made available to make users’ data less easily available to government snooping.

Snowden and Soghoian emphasized that privacy can be protected – “encryption works,” Snowden insisted – and argued that precisely because of Snowden’s leaks, major companies have had to improve their security systems, and both companies and officials have begun to push back against overbroad government surveillance.
Malcolm March 10, 2014 at 5:48pm

Sorry about the echo. The ACLU restates and interprets without the echo.

This reply was deleted.

Replies

Here's the storey without the echo; Snowden defends the Constitution:

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.