Too Expensive Science Undermine Repeatability?

The modern science is divorced from the great 19th centuary science in many ways. To demonstrate Farraday's law, for instance, all you nead is a magnet, some wires and a galvanometer. Faraday did it in his own laboratory. It is not a surprise at all because the 19th centuary physics was cheap in two ways, interlectually (time it takes to learn them) and financially.Try that to demonstration of higgs boson and you must be kidding!! LHC is a behemoth that only zillionairs can fund! Most people around the world will have to rely on pure faith to beleive in or doubt in higgs. When a scientific apparatus becomes as expensive as LHC, many people must be involved in the work and the findings will of course be more in accordance to the norms of those who are working in the project (the authority of say LHC) than on actual facts.Farraday could effortlessly demonstrate to those who were attending his lecture the correctness of electromagnetic induction. As such, in his time, leymen participated in DECIDING whether what the scientists were saying is correct or not!! In modern physics, leymen only participate in FUNDING the project and BELEIVING in the decisions of PTB! The leymen even in Geneva is not even sure whether LHC is releasing the devil from bottomless pits, opening stargates, is creating weapons ect. Yet LHC boast that its duty is to advance knowledge in the world!Today's 'physics' is a maze of arcane equations that no ordinary person can even begine to understand. Yet it is this person who is funding the projects to 'prove' what has no meaning to him nor can he scrutinize to check if his money is being used well! Modern apparatus is complex. To scrutinize and see if the possibly fake magician is not exchanging the hats and pulling out the rabbit is not a joke. You need to master Hamiltonians, Riemannians, complex numbers, tensors, linear algebra, computer programming, etc. But it nead not be so. In 19th centuary, phyc and math could be clearly seperated. Proper physics has a characteristic YES or NO answer that doesn't need any school to observe. Either the magnet pull a wire or not! The 'how much' is often opinionated. It is the 'how much' though that modern physicist is obsessed with.Modern physics use behemoth money and you know that like butter acompany bread, wherever there is money, there corruption accompany. At some point, MONEY not KNOWLEDGE becomes the silavating factor. Lets listen from the horse's mouth:"In 1992, when LIGO initial funding was approved, it represented the biggest investment NSF had ever made. It was a big risk. But the National Science Foundation is an agency that takes such risk"France Cordon NSF directorThe guy does not even hid the obvious business language! But in science there shouldn't be any risk. Either LIGO could verify GR or otherwise it should falsify it. In whichever way, it would be an important advance in knowledge. But if it would be financialy risky not to confirm GR, then how would you espect LIGO to do anything but confirm GR??

It is amusing that sometimes these American physics sophists goes to the extend that they unwittingly reveal themselves. Lets close exermine this LIGO report. It is said that it is designed to test GR. It should detect gravity waves by close exermining how light is diflected by rippling curvartures of spacetime. But that light is bent by curvarture of spacetime is itself a prediction of GR. So we test GR in converging blackholes by assuming that it applies there! Or should I say that if GR is wrong, then LIGO is not a valid test for GR!!

It is said that close exermining spacetime near converging blackholes is revealing gravitatinal waves. But they are also saying that these waves confirm for the first time that blackholes exist! Indead, they are not even so cocky to begine with that there is such a thing as a blackhole! And which math of the blackhole are they using? The one from Schwarzchild, Kerr or the one revised by Hawking? Meanwile, Hawking and his fellows (theoreticians) are killing their hours wondering if blackholes exist in the first place and wondering what the held BH is to begine with. Meanwhile, the experiments guys are 'proving' things about blackholes!

"Thanks for the info Drexk-I don't see the Earth becoming a full fledged GFL memeber unless a 4th density/5th dimensional level is created. The spirit worlds here are loaded with baddies, always in waiting to re-incarnate and continue their nasty,…"

Replies

Roaring Lovely February 13, 2016 at 10:42am

It is amusing that sometimes these American physics sophists goes to the extend that they unwittingly reveal themselves. Lets close exermine this LIGO report. It is said that it is designed to test GR. It should detect gravity waves by close exermining how light is diflected by rippling curvartures of spacetime. But that light is bent by curvarture of spacetime is itself a prediction of GR. So we test GR in converging blackholes by assuming that it applies there! Or should I say that if GR is wrong, then LIGO is not a valid test for GR!!

It is said that close exermining spacetime near converging blackholes is revealing gravitatinal waves. But they are also saying that these waves confirm for the first time that blackholes exist! Indead, they are not even so cocky to begine with that there is such a thing as a blackhole! And which math of the blackhole are they using? The one from Schwarzchild, Kerr or the one revised by Hawking? Meanwile, Hawking and his fellows (theoreticians) are killing their hours wondering if blackholes exist in the first place and wondering what the held BH is to begine with. Meanwhile, the experiments guys are 'proving' things about blackholes!
Roaring Lovely February 13, 2016 at 6:38am

If you are clever, you should be able to tell why LIGO could be risky. No one realy could doubt GR should LIGO produce a null result! The only explanation physicists would concoct is that LIGO idea was faulty to begine with and that it realy could not detect the waves. So it would be a waste of money!!!

In other words, LIGO could only be allowed to VERIFY GR and not to FALSIFY it. In proper science, such is a worthless research!!