Hi Guys.
Another quick update/post.
The limited disclosure processis still under way. At this rate all disclosure will still take a little under 100 years but this is a start.
Of course there are those of us who are working to full disclosure within 5 years. This is tedious and hard work.
There are those in power who are starting to listen.
Im annoucing here that Extraterrtrial presence will be disclosed in the upcoming years pehaps even months.
The most likely race to be revealed will be Nordics.
There is much that has been spoken about the nordics especially in groups who favour them as spiritual hierarchy and angels.
Lets be clear there are negative and postive humanlike ETs. The ones who will be disclosed of course have their own agenda here on earth though tend to be more accepting of humans then their negative counterparts.
They are no religion and do not like being spoken about in terms of saviours.
The second option for the race will be a race that resemble light skin variations to South Africans. There will be an interesting twist to this disclosure if it is revealed and with ties to ancient african races and the cult like following of "Sirians" . Or the Dogons.
Anyway here is the small disclosure that the elite have initially allowed.
Warp drive exists. Though the level that a few organisations use are far beyond this article. They still need to give the impression of Research and Development. A plan or progression and not just release they large file.
Replies
Besides, when a subject is above your head, it is YOUR problem, not the problem of the one presenting it! If a post is confusing you, it doesn't mean the presenter is confusing. It means you have to do basic tasks of understanding the subject ON YOUR PART, before you dive into advance topics as 'warp drives'.
If I confused you somewhere, and you were interested in understanding what I said, then the automatic step is normally ASK FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION. Which part of what I said confused you?
Are realy interested in warp drives,..., phyc of interstellar travel? Apparently your not! What impress you is petty issue seeming to do with your perception of MODESTY, not theoretic phyc:
1)You think your schooling pple
2.)You think you had to simplyfy
How about what I said concerning neutrinos breaking Einstein's barrier?
So andromedan, are you ready for the lesson that involves Maxwell's theory, so I may show you how Lorentz's Transforms follow? Have you done Vector Field Theory? If not, then not only do I have to simplify this for you, but yes, I am schooling you on this particular topic. Don't underestimate me!
I find Roaring Lovely to be quite inspiring. :)
WE HAVE NO REASON TO THINK THAT AN OBJECT THAT IS ELECTROMAGNETICALLY NEUTRAL ADHERES TO THE RULES OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY.
Infact, we see NEUTRINO, being electromagnetically neutral, seems to already challenge Einsteinian barrier! But you must understand that QM still misunderstands electromagnetism as 'neuclear forces' and so seeks unifications. Neutrino is still not truely neutral. However, fact that it is now known to have mass and travels at c (or very near), already puts Einsteinian barrier on a shaking ground!
Fact one should have in fingure tips is that all the properties we can detect and measure as to belong to objects are of electromagnetic origin!! Turn off electromagnetism property of an object and the object disapear off the observable world (it becomes 'dark matter') !!! With this understanding, you can easily see why early 20th centuary physiciststs, including Einstein, got confused and made relativity a law on its own and not just a logical consiquence of Maxwell's theory. Then relativistic effects came to be eroneously thought to apply to all objects, and not to charged particles as we understand when we deduce relativity equations from Maxwell's theory other than from Einstein's postulates. Fact is, Einstein etc did not understand the true electromagnetic nature of everything we observe and term it 'matter'. They were working on an outdated notion of matter and 'solids' wherin a thing observable can be neutral. However, we now understand that neutrality amongst the objects we see is an emergent phenomena of baryonic matter particles! If nothing we can directly observe is fundamentaly neutral, then we need not see relativity as to be anything more than a logical extension of electromagnetic effects just as Lorentz transform are deduced from Maxwell's theory.
As you can see, it makes perfect sense to suppose that magnetism is contingent on an invisible medium, pervading everywhere, that connects the two objects and facilitates communication between them. It is clearly less than ludicruos to artribute magnetism to sheer empty space, as Einsteinian theory demands. Yet once we artribute magnetism to empty space, instead of aether, the Einsteinian barrier becomes unintelligible and unreasonable. Something just to swallow by faith and not understanding? Ways of circumventing it becomes inconceivable.
In case of Einsteinian barrier, commonsens tells us that it is amenable to explanation, just like the sound barrier. Suprisingly, mainstream physicists never try such understanding. Equations interprated (wee bit incongruosly) as 'Einstein's Theory Of Relativity', termed 'Lorentz Transform' are easily deducable from Maxwell's Theory of electromagnetism. Infact, relativity ought not be a theory on its own other than just a PREDICTION of Maxwell's theory. This fact is never taught in schools!
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next