what is the sun's source of fuel?

According to mainstream science, the sun works by converting its mass slowly into energy. Calculating the mass of the sun and its power, they calculated the maximum years the sun will work before it turns into a RED GIANT swallowing all of us to extinction!Combining their reasoning with some THERMODYNAMICS ideas, it seems to imly that all the stars will eventually burn out and the universe will become a cold, dark place with no life (DEAD HEATH)! Arguing in reverse, it means that the stars could not have been burning forever as they would have been exhausted infinite years ago. This might be the reason physicists can only reason in terms of big bang.Such a cosmos doesn't impress my intuition. I like thinking that as energy from stars spread out in form of rays, they eventualy get converted into some form of matter you might term it IMPONDERABLE MATTER, a kinda ether. Infact, this convertion is thought to happen even in spaces between stars. It is this eventually, this imponderable matter get sucked back to stars via gravity so that the total mass of a star never changes. You can view stars as things recembling 4 DIMENSIONAL MAGNETS, i.e HYPERTHOROIDS.Thats just my opinion. Give me yours.

It's called nuclear fusion. A pioneer in this process is Steve Jones (former professor of physics at Brigham Young University (HE WAS FIRED AFTER PROVING THE PRESENCE OF THE BUILDING DEMOLITION CHEMICAL THERMATE AT THE 9/11 WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING SITES (#1 and #2)). The by-product of the sun's nuclear fusion process is helium, the same stuff that makes you talk like Donald Duck when you inhale it. I am certain that if this process is used on this planet, Al Gore will implement a Donald Duck tax that needs to be sent to him for insulting ducks. Here's the process:

What is happening in the middle of the Sun is analogous to burning methane:

C H₄ + 2 O₂ --> C O₂ + 2 H₂ O

In this reaction, the final molecules have less internal energy than the starting molecules. Since energy is conserved, the extra energy is released as energy of motion of the molecules. That is the gas gets hotter. The amount of energy involved is 5.5 eV each time the reaction above happens.

As we have seen, much more energy than that must be involved in the reactions inside the Sun and other stars. The evidence is strong that the overall reaction is "burning" hydrogen to make helium:

4 ¹H + 2 e --> ⁴He + 2 neutrinos + 6 photons

The high energy photons produced by the nuclear process don't get far. They are absorbed and heat the gas. The helium remains in the middle of the Sun. The neutrinos easily zip out of the Sun. (Neutrinos easily zip through most anything, reacting with matter only rarely.)

In this reaction, the final particles have less internal energy than the starting particles. Since energy is conserved, the extra energy is released as energy of motion of the nuclei and electrons in the solar gas, the production of lots of low energy photons and, finally, the energy of the neutrinos, which just zip right out of the Sun. That is the gas gets hotter and has lots of photons (and neutrinos). The amount of energy involved is 26 MeV = 26 x 10⁶ eV each time the reaction above happens.

"Yes, they are returning and some devic elohim architects are already here, but not making themselves so obvious, as 3I/Atlas did, not from the Sagittarius constellation and not as specialised and skilled in anchoring the system, temporally...in view…"

Replies

Solarkid October 2, 2013 at 10:09pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
Phylos October 2, 2013 at 11:57am

Get it girl!
Phylos October 2, 2013 at 11:38am

Imponderable matter? Yeah, I like your theory. Have you been visiting with Einstein in dreamland? I think he would be interested in your mode of thought. Ma ybe you could write up your theory in detail, get some math nerd to scribble a lot of numbers and stuff on a chalk board and get offered a professorship at Oxford. Then you could hang out with Stephen Hawkins and be a soccer hooligan in your spare time!
Malcolm October 1, 2013 at 8:24pm

It's called nuclear fusion. A pioneer in this process is Steve Jones (former professor of physics at Brigham Young University (HE WAS FIRED AFTER PROVING THE PRESENCE OF THE BUILDING DEMOLITION CHEMICAL THERMATE AT THE 9/11 WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING SITES (#1 and #2)). The by-product of the sun's nuclear fusion process is helium, the same stuff that makes you talk like Donald Duck when you inhale it. I am certain that if this process is used on this planet, Al Gore will implement a Donald Duck tax that needs to be sent to him for insulting ducks. Here's the process:

What is happening in the middle of the Sun is analogous to burning methane:

C H₄ + 2 O₂ --> C O₂ + 2 H₂ O
In this reaction, the final molecules have less internal energy than the starting molecules. Since energy is conserved, the extra energy is released as energy of motion of the molecules. That is the gas gets hotter. The amount of energy involved is 5.5 eV each time the reaction above happens.

As we have seen, much more energy than that must be involved in the reactions inside the Sun and other stars. The evidence is strong that the overall reaction is "burning" hydrogen to make helium:

4 ¹H + 2 e --> ⁴He + 2 neutrinos + 6 photons

The high energy photons produced by the nuclear process don't get far. They are absorbed and heat the gas. The helium remains in the middle of the Sun. The neutrinos easily zip out of the Sun. (Neutrinos easily zip through most anything, reacting with matter only rarely.)

In this reaction, the final particles have less internal energy than the starting particles. Since energy is conserved, the extra energy is released as energy of motion of the nuclei and electrons in the solar gas, the production of lots of low energy photons and, finally, the energy of the neutrinos, which just zip right out of the Sun. That is the gas gets hotter and has lots of photons (and neutrinos). The amount of energy involved is 26 MeV = 26 x 10⁶ eV each time the reaction above happens.

This reply was deleted.

Replies

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.

Whistleblower / Neurologist Dr. Jack Cruz

Note: this page contains paid content.