Why Did It Take Long To Discover Chaos And What Are The Implications?

To a layperson, it is pretty stupid to try to predict where the butterfly will land next after resting on your nose. However, our scientist neaded a supercomputer to do zillions of calculations to finaly realize that indead, it is stupid! Needless to say then, thus chaos was discovered in 1970s! Are you getting it well? We discovered andromeda, general relativity quantum mechanics, launched setlites etc before we discovered what is proven to us every time you stand, sit, turn, jump, walk etc. In a similar mix, scientists are yet to discover consciousness!The chaos case is a classic example which shows that if you look at a universe will a preconceived idea that there is no A, it will be very hard for you to discover A even if it is just at your nose. To put it in a nutshell, ever since Laplace gawked at Newton's work, then jumped naked and shouted eurekah! Give me the innitial conditions and I will predict ANYTHING in the future, chaos was a phenomena to be explained away as an accident in the universe. So it is just like they do to SENTIENCE in modern times.Even now the echo of determinism is yet to die. The modern scientisist boast that it has been proven by science that everything is predictable. When you ask him what criteria of claims that should fit in this basket termed 'science', he says that those that makes testable predictions. Then they wonder why chaos took centuaries to discover! Even a moron should smell that a set of testable predictions proving that the world is predictable is question begging. It is just discovering what you want to find in a chaotic soup containing everything!A great mathematician, Henri Poincare had already harmered a very long nail in the coffine of determinism. However, the corpse refused to enter the coffine for nearly another centuary! This is perharps what created the bad smells of quantum mechanics and GR. As someone has noted, scientific theoris nearly win through hard evidences. Too often than not, prejudices, corruptions, prestige etc take the lead. This mean that we must always keep going back and checking the forgoten theories. For instance after discovering chaos, we should wonder if quantum mechanics would have developed if the physicists at that time had chaos in their minds.

"A few years ago, it was Farage himself who went out on a boat, off Kent, to highlight the channel crossing illegals, from France, several weeks before main stream media, even covered the topic.....Nigel exposed the Tory goverment attempt, to…"

"Hehe....It's Farage being too "British" with his words and desire to please all sides of a debate.....You and I are more "Prussian," a bit like straight talking Americans, too.....😁"

Replies

Suiris May 19, 2016 at 5:29pm

Some are fascinating, while some are plain, gray and boring.

Substance is lacking. Trauma is required.

Otherwise it'll remain colorless.

But they can't handle fear.

That's the point

Ambrosia
Roaring Lovely May 19, 2016 at 2:06pm

Yep! There is no much difference between astrology, tarrot cards etc and quantum mechanics! How many experiments do I do before I conclude that the probability of getting a head is incact 3/4 and not 1/2? I can throw ten, times and get 7 heads, throw 100 and get 40, throw 1000 and get 600, throw 10000 and get 7000, throw 100000 and get 50000, throw 1000000 and get 300000, throw 10000000 and get 6000000, yada yad, everyone will stop where it fits their theory.:)
Malcolm May 19, 2016 at 10:58am

Quantum mechanics is very similar to astrology in the sense that there is potential for a variety of outcomes, with some more probable than others. An interesting difference between these two studies is that the U.S. tax authorities define practitioners of quantum mechanics as physicists, and yet define practitioners of astrology as entertainers.

This reply was deleted.

Replies

Note: this page contains paid content.

Note: this page contains paid content.

For Many Public Companies, the AI Tipping Point Has Arrived

Note: this page contains paid content.