FUBAR!!!
May 9, 2016
Will Newly Signed Obama Executive Order Pave Way For 'Final False Flag' Leading To Global Dictatorship And A 'New World Order'?
By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die
While many have been quick to point out that the latest Executive Order signed by Barack Obama to 'ensure a smooth transition' between the new, incoming president in January 2017 and his administration is standard and only traditional and George Bush signed such an Executive Order as well, as we learn in the 1st video, this latest Executive Order may be anything but 'standard' and 'traditional' and differs greatly from the one George Bush signed back in 2008 in one major way as looked at in much more detail below.
Considering everything else that we've been witnessing around the world recently, including John Kerry's recent statement to graduates at Northeastern University to 'prepare for a borderless world' as well as Barack Obama's recent warning to graduates of Howard University to 'be ready for profound change in our society and our economy', some believe that Mr. Obama's most recent Executive Order may be preparing for the 'final false flag' in America to bring in the 'New World Order'. You can see the full executive order embedded below videos. 
When this Executive Order first was released, (yes, on a Friday...why Friday?) we too believed this was quite normal as we were aware of the similar order signed by Bush back in October of 2008, soon before the November election. However, once we began researching it, we noticed one major difference compared to the one Bush signed back in 2008; this Executive Order specifically mentions that the 'transition team' will be involved in the preparing and hosting of interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises as seen in the screenshot of the new executive order above.
Do they know something that we don't know? Why didn't Bush include similar language and 'exercises'? According to a story from Infowars that came out in late April, the elite and 'new world order' are so petrified of Donald Trump that they may be preparing to declare martial law to stop him. Is that what these 'exercises' refer to? As has been pointed out time and again on ANP and elsewhere in the alternative media, George Soros' slovenly gang of paid rioters have threatened to interrupt the 'political process' as has ISIS and 'black lives matter' and 'orchestrated terrorism' is on the rise in America. 
Should Americans be concerned? When we consider all of the other Executive Orders that Obama has signed during his presidency, particularly Executive Order #13603 as outlined in this story from Forbes.com, it's quite easy to see why so many people believe that Obama may be the last president of the US, and our first dictator in a 'socialist, one-world government', as he has enabled himself to seize control of the economy, all forms of energy, all forms of food capable of being ingested by human beings or animals, all forms of water, and much more. This EO actually includes terminology that would allow him to force Americans into slave labor. Directly from the 2012 Forbes story.:
To be sure, much of this language has appeared in national security executive orders that previous presidents have issued periodically since the beginning of the Cold War.
But more than previous national security executive orders, Obama’s 13603 seems to describe a potentially totalitarian regime obsessed with control over everything. Obama’s executive order makes no effort to justify the destruction of liberty, no effort to explain how amassing totalitarian control would enable government to deal effectively with cyber sabotage, suicide bombings, chemical warfare, nuclear missiles or other possible threats. It’s quite likely there would be greater difficulty responding to threats, since totalitarian regimes suffer from economic chaos, colossal waste, massive corruption and bureaucratic infighting that are inevitable consequences of extreme centralization. Such problems plagued fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, communist China and other regimes. Totalitarian control would probably trigger resistance movements and underground networks like those that developed in Western Europe during the Nazi occupation. Totalitarian control could provoke more political turmoil than there was in the Vietnam War era of the 1960s. There would probably be a serious brain drain as talented people with critical skills escaped to freedom wherever that might be. Canada?
Replies