Replies

• 

  Drekx Omega February 3, 2014 at 8:53pm

  I like solid investigations that prove 911 was an inside job....

  I'll embed this vid, which is lengthy, BUT WORTH THE EFFORT.... ;-) This is about the Pentagon false flag attack and coverup which followed...

   

   

   
• 

  happy person February 3, 2014 at 7:28pm

  I wish that there were more people like this man in USA. BRAVO to him!
  • 

    Malcolm > happy person February 3, 2014 at 7:45pm

    People are waking up and growing in numbers, so you have a right to be a "happy person."

    The alternative is the blue pill:

     
• 

  Si February 3, 2014 at 5:57pm

  It's nice to see people wake up.  Most people I talk to these days know 911 was an inside job.  You'd have to be pretty dumb or in complete denial to not see this.  It was BLATANTLY OBVIOUS the day it happened.  Loads of information have come out since then.  U.S. govt is full of criminals.  I think most people know this too.  Anyone still paying there taxes??  You're supporting war and crimes on humanity if you are. Think about that one.  File exempt on your W-2  if you are employed by someone else.   If you're self employed, well don't file/pay these criminals anything.  
• 

  Acute Observer February 3, 2014 at 5:11pm

  They've had 13 years to bury all the evidence on that event. What new evidence could you possibly find and that would hold in a court since none of the ones found so far, did?
  • 

    Malcolm > Acute Observer February 3, 2014 at 5:24pm

    Nuclear fusion pioneer and physics Professor Steve Jones (of Brigham Young University) has scientific evidence of use of thermate (a demolition explosion) via spectrographic analysis of steel samples taken from different sources at the WTC building sites that fell, and no U.S.Federal court will allow him in with this evidence per cases filed. "Don't bother us with the facts, our minds are already made up" is the response.

     
    • 

      Acute Observer > Malcolm February 3, 2014 at 6:19pm

      One might raise the question on how the evidence was collected and what witnesses there were to this process?

      Also, who did the analysis and where, and are they certified for that kind of analysis work?

      Many questions remain before this is court worthy. :)

      Logical reasoning is NOT considered to be evidence by any civilized court since it's far too easy to make even false statements completely logically sound. 
      • 

        Malcolm > Acute Observer February 3, 2014 at 6:54pm

        Here's a 2 hour symposium from Professor Steve Jones explaining his evidence, which was collected from different people and at different areas of the 9/11 WTC sites. He used the scientific method in accordance with his testing of the samples, just like the F.B.I. does (BUT THE F.B.I. WOULDN'T DO SO WITH 9/11 WTC BUILDING EVIDENCE, "CAUSE "the muslims" ARE RESPONSIBLE) 

        Click https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-ZOKgb...

        THE JUSTICE SYSTEM DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK. The Federal Reserve and IRS are examples of this since both are illegal acts per U.S. Constitution definitions, and no U.S. Federal judge will challenge this fact since such a judgement against these entities would affect their pension.
• 

  Malcolm February 3, 2014 at 4:06pm

  Yeah, a cave dweller with a laptop and half a dozen Saudi Arabian citizens (armed with box cutters and two months jumbo jet flight training) took down two New York skyscrapers. Next we'll hear that Oswald was a crack shot when he was with the Marines.
  • 

    Acute Observer > Malcolm February 3, 2014 at 5:18pm

    I realized it was all scripted the moment I saw the buildings fall.

    Can we spell "Controlled Demolition" yet? I can't believe the news even bothered to air that part. Who on earth could possibly fall for that I mean? 1 building could statistically maybe fall that way by accident once in a lifetime but 3, and on the same day, and in the same area?!? I think NOT.

    It would go against the law of probability. ;)