IX
PERSONAL INCIDENTS
Full intimate self-observation of the Myself, is urgent when it comes, to discover wrong psychological states.
Unquestionably the wrong internal states can be corrected by proper procedures.
Since the inner life is the magnet that attracts external events, we need with maximum urgency urgent eliminate from our psyche erroneous psychological states.
Correct wrong psychological states is indispensable when you want to fundamentally alter the nature of certain undesirable events.
Altering our relationship with certain events is possible if we eliminate certain absurd our inner psychological states.
Destructive external situations could become inoffensive and even constructive by intelligently correcting erroneous internal states.
You can change the nature of unpleasant events that happen to us, when intimately purified. Who never corrects absurd psychological states, believing himself very strong becomes a victim of circumstances.
Bring order to our messy interior house is vital, when you want to change the course of an unhappy existence.
People complain all, suffer, cry, protest, wanted to change his life, to get out from misfortune they are, unfortunately do not work on themselves.
The people want not to realize that the inner life attracts external circumstances and if they are painful due to absurd inner states.
The outside is only the reflection of the interior, who changes internally originates a new order of things.
External events would never be as important as how to react to them.
¿ Do you remain serene before the insulting?, Do you welcome the unpleasant manifestations of your fellowmen ?.
How you react to the infidelity of the loved ?, you got carried away by the poison of jealousy ?, Did you kill ?, Are you in jail ?.
Hospitals, cemeteries or graveyards, jails are filled with sincerely mistaken absurdly reacted to external events.
The best weapon a man can use in life, is a correct psychological state.
One can disarm beasts and unmask traitors by means of appropriate internal states.
Wrong inner states turn us into defenseless victims of human perversity.
Learn to face before the most unpleasant events of practical life with an appropriate internal attitude...
Do not you identify yourself with any event; remember that everything passes; learn to see life as a film and will receive the benefits...
Do not forget that worthless events could lead you to misfortune, if not eliminate of your psyche wrong inner states.
Each external event needs unquestionably the appropriate ticket; that is, the precise psychological state.
X
DIFFERENT SELVES
The Rational Mammal mistakenly called man really does not have a defined individuality.
Unquestionably, this lack of psychological unity in the humanoid is the cause of so many difficulties and bitterness.
The physical body is a complete unit and works as an organic whole, unless being sick.
But the inner life of the humanoid is in no way a psychological unit.
The worst of all this, despite what they say the various schools of Pseudo-esoteric and pseudo-occultist type, is the absence of psychological organization in the intimate depths of each subject.
Certainly in such conditions, there is no harmonious work as a whole, in the inner life of people.
The Humanoid, about its inner state, is a psychological multiplicity, a sum of "Selves".
The ignoramuses of this tenebrous era, worship the "I", which deify, put on altars, call it "ALTER EGO", "Higher Self", "Divine Self", etc., etc., etc.
They not want to realize the "know-it all" of this age in which we live, that "Higher" or "Lower Self" are two sections of the same pluralized Ego...
The humanoid certainly does not have a "permanent I" but a multitude of different "I" subhuman and absurd.
The poor intellectual animal mistakenly called man is like a house in disorder where instead of a master, there are many servants who always want to order and do what they please...
The biggest mistake of Pseudo-Esoteric and Pseudo-Occultism cheap, is to assume that others possess or have a "Standing and Immutable I" without beginning and without end...
If those who think like that shall awake consciousness if only for a moment, they could clearly demonstrate for themselves that the rational humanoid is never the same for long...
The intellectual mammal from the psychological point of view, is changing constantly...
Think that if a person is always called James, is always James is something of a joke in very bad taste...
That guy who called himself James has other "Selves", other egos, expressed through his personality at different times and although James not like greed, another "I" let's call it like Simon- likes of greed and so on...
No person is the same continuously, you really need not be very wise to take full account of the many changes and contradictions of each individual...
Suppose someone has a "Standing and Immutable" Ego equivalent to of course to an abuse towards others and to himself...
Within each person lives many persons, many "I's", you can verify this by itself and directly, any awake, conscious person...
XI
THE BELOVED EGO
However that top and bottom are two sections of the same thing, is not more set the following corollary: "Higher, Lower Self" are two aspects of the same tenebrous and pluralized EGO.
The so-called "Divine Self" or "Higher Self", "ALTER EGO" or something like that, is certainly a trick of "MYSELF", a form of self-deception.
When the I want to continue here and in the hereafter, self-deceives with the false concept of a Divine Immortal Ego ...
None of us has a real, permanent, immutable, eternal, ineffable, etc., etc. "I", etc.
None of us have indeed a veritable Unity of Being; unfortunately we not even possess a legitimate individuality.
The Ego even continues beyond the grave, however, has a beginning and an end.
The Ego, the I, is never something individual, unitary,. Obviously the Ego is Egos".
In East Tibet to the "selves" are called "psychic aggregates" or simply "values" be those lasts positive or negative ones.
If we think of each "I" as a different person, we can assert emphatically that: "Within each person living in the world, there are many people".
Unquestionably within each one of us live many different people, some better, some worse...
Each of these selves, each of these people struggle for supremacy, wants to be exclusive, it controls the intellectual brain or emotional and motor centers whenever they can, while another moves it ...
The Doctrine of the many Selves was taught in the Eastern Tibet by true clairvoyants, by authentic Illuminated...
Each of our psychological defects is personified in this or that Self. Since we have thousands and even millions of defects, ostensibly many people live within us.
In psychological issues we have been able to clearly verify that paranoid, egomaniac and mythomaniacs subjects for nothing in life would abandon the cult of the beloved ego.
Unquestionably, such people mortally hate the doctrine of the many "I's".
When one really wants to know himself, must observe himself and try to know the different "I's" that are tucked within the personality.
If any of our readers do not yet understand this doctrine of the many "I's" is due solely to the lack of practice on self-observation.
As one practice inner self-observation, comes discover by itself to many people, many "selves" that live within our own personality.
Those who deny the doctrine of the many Selves, who worship a divine Ego, indubitably never has been self-observed seriously. Speaking this time in Socratic style say that those people not only ignore but also ignore that they ignore.
Certainly we could never know ourselves without serious and profound self-observation.
As long as any subject remains considered as one, it is clear that any inner change will be something more than impossible.
XII
THE RADICAL CHANGE
Meanwhile a man continue with the error of believing himself One, Unique, Individual, it is clear that radical change will be something more than impossible.
The very fact that the esoteric work begins with rigorous self-observation, is telling us a multiplicity of psychological factors, Selves or undesirable elements that it is urgent to extirpate, eradicate from within.
Unquestionably in no way be possible to eliminate unknown errors, urges previously observe that we want to separate from our psyche.
This type of work is not external but internal, and those who think that any manual of manners or external and superficial ethical system can lead them to success, they are in fact completely wrong.
The concrete and definite that the intimate work begins with attention focused on the full self-observation, fact is more than enough to show that this requires a very particular each of us personal effort motive.
Speaking frankly and straightforwardly, emphatically we assert the following: No human being could do this work for us.
It is not possible any change in our psyche without the direct observation of this whole set of subjective factors within.
Giving by accepted the multiplicity of errors, ruling out the need to study and direct observation of them, actually means a evasion or escape, a flee from itself, a form of self-deception.
Only through rigorous effort judicious observation of himself, without evasions of any kind we can really show that we are not "one" but "many".
Admitting the plurality of I and make it evident through rigorous observation are two different aspects.
Someone can accept the Doctrine of the many Selves without ever having evidenced it; the latter is only possible self-observed carefully.
Shun the work of intimate observation, seek evasions, it is an unmistakable sign of degeneration.
While a man sustain the illusion that it is always one and the same person cannot change and it is obvious that the purpose of this work is to achieve a gradual change in our inner life.
The radical transformation is a definite possibility that normally is lost when you are not working on himself.
The starting point of radical change remains hidden as the man continue believing to be One.
Those who reject the Doctrine of the many Selves clearly show that have never been seriously observed themselves.
Severe self-observation without evasions of any kind, allows us to verify for themselves the harsh reality that we are not "one" but "many".
In the world of subjective opinions, various pseudo-esoteric or pseudo-occultist theories always serve of alley to escape themselves...
Unquestionably, the illusion that it is always one and the same person serves as a pitfall for self-observation...
Someone might say, "I know I am not one but many, Gnosis has taught me." Such a claim although it was very sincere but if there were not full lived experience on that doctrinaire aspect obviously such statement would be something merely external and superficial.
To evidence, to experience and understand is fundamental, only then you can consciously work to achieve a radical change.
Affirming is one thing, understanding is another. When someone says, " I understand that I am not one but many" if their understanding is true and not merely insubstantial wordiness of ambiguous chatter, this indicates, points out, accuses, full verification of the Doctrine of the Many Selves.
Knowledge and understanding are different. The first of these is of the mind, the second of the heart.
The mere knowledge of the Doctrine of the Many Selves is useless; unfortunately in these times in which we live, knowledge has gone far beyond comprehension, because the poor intellectual animal mistakenly called man, unfolded only the side of knowledge unfortunately forgetting the corresponding side of the Being.
Knowing the Doctrine of the Many Selves and understand it, it is fundamental for all true radical change.
When a man begins to observe himself carefully from the angle that is not one but many, he has obviously begun serious work on his inner nature.
XIII
OBSERVER AND OBSERVED
It is very clear and not difficult to understand that when someone begins to seriously observe himself from the point of view that is not one but many, really begins to work on all that load inside.
It is a hindrance, obstacle, stumbling, for the work of intimate self-observation, the following psychological defects: Mythomaniac, (delirium of grandeur, believe a God). Self - worship (belief in a permanent I, worshiping any kind of Alter-Ego). Paranoia, (know it all, self-sufficiency, vanity, thinking oneself infallible, mystic pride, person who cannot see another's point of view).
When it continues with the absurd conviction that is one, which has a permanent I, it is something more than impossible serious work on oneself.
Who always believed to be one, will never be able to separate from their own undesirable elements. They will consider every thought, feeling, desire, emotion, passion, affection, etc., etc., etc., as different functionalism, unchangeable, of his own nature and even to be justified to others saying that such and that personal defects are of hereditary character ...
Whoever accepts the Doctrine of the Many Selves, understand based on observation that every desire, thought, action, passion, etc., corresponds to this or another I different, distinct...
Any athlete of the intimate self-observation works very seriously within himself and strives away from his psyche the diverse undesirable elements that load inside...
If one truly and sincerely begins to observe internally, it is divided in two: Observer and Observed.
If such a division is not produced, it is evident that never we take a step forward in the wonderful way of self-knowledge.
How can we observe themselves if we make the mistake of not wanting to divide us between observer and observed?
If such a division is not produced, it is obvious that we never take a step forward on the path of self-knowledge.
Undoubtedly, when this division does not occur we continue identified with all processes of the pluralized I...
Who identifies himself with the diverse processes of the pluralized Ego, it is always a victim of circumstances.
How could modify circumstances that that not know himself?. How could he know himself who has never been internally observed?. How could someone self-observe if not previously divided into Observer and Observed?.
Now, no one can begin to change radically while not able to say: "This desire is an animal I that I must to eliminate "; "This selfish thought is another Self tormenting me and I need to disintegrate"; "This sentiment that hurts my heart is an intruder that I need to reduce to cosmic dust"; etc., etc., etc.
Naturally this is impossible for anyone who has never been divided between observer and observed.
Who takes all his psychological processes as functionalism of a unique, individual and permanent, is so identified with all his errors, he has so united to himself, that has lost for that reason the ability to separate them from his psyche.
Obviously such people can never change radically, they are people condemned to the most complete failure.
Comments