WASHINGTON (AP) — It's impeachment because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says it is.?

That's the legal position of House Democrats, and they are sticking with it, for now, even as President Donald Trump decries impeachment as "illegitimate" without a formal House vote to start it. Trump has said he won't cooperate with the impeachment investigation, which is looking into his dealings with Ukraine, unless there is a vote and Republicans are treated more fairly.

For the Democrats, there are legal, strategic and political reasons to stay the course.

THE LEGAL RATIONALE

Under the law, Democrats say they have no obligation to hold a vote. The Constitution gives the House "the sole power of impeachment" and the Senate "the sole power to try all impeachments." And it dictates the removal from office of an impeached president who is convicted by the Senate of "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

Congress is left to fill in the details. And there is no requirement for a vote under House rules.

Republicans are pointing to precedent. They note that the House held votes to authorize impeachment investigations against Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

In an Oct. 3 letter to Pelosi questioning whether she would hold a vote to start the process, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said the speaker had so far given no indication whether "key historical precedents or basic standards of due process will be observed."

Pelosi responded that House rules allow committees to conduct investigations, including impeachment investigations.

"There is no requirement under the Constitution, under House rules, or House precedent that the whole House vote before proceeding with an impeachment inquiry," Pelosi wrote.

15 PHOTOS
Democrats who didn't vote for Nancy Pelosi for House speaker
See Gallery

___

THE STRATEGY

Without a vote, Democrats are able to craft the investigation however they see fit — and leverage a vote if it becomes necessary later on.

In his letter, McCarthy asked Pelosi if she planned to allow Republicans as part of impeachment to have equal subpoena power or give the president's lawyers a chance to cross-examine witnesses.

A resolution to authorize an impeachment inquiry could potentially set some of those rules. But without a vote, Pelosi doesn't have to answer any of those questions or give Republicans any of those privileges.

A vote would also take time, and Democrats have said they want to complete the investigation quickly as the election year approaches. They also note that public support for impeachment has increased.

If a vote to formalize impeachment becomes necessary for any reason, Pelosi could always hold one later. In the impeachment inquiry of President Nixon — which was never completed because he resigned — the House didn't officially vote to start the impeachment probe until months after the investigation had started.

___

THE POLITICS

Pelosi is also likely weighing the politics. If she were to hold a vote in response to Trump's letter, she could be seen as backing down.

And it could put some of her members in a tough position. While almost all the Democrats, including most of the moderate freshman Democrats who helped flip Republican districts in 2018, now support the inquiry, few are pushing to have a vote on the House floor. A vote launching impeachment could be used against them in campaign ads, and Trump and the GOP have made clear they intend to campaign on the issue in 2020.

For now, Pelosi is holding her cards close.

"If we want to do it, we'll do it. If we don't, we don't," Pelosi said in an interview with the Atlanta Journal Constitution last week. "But we're certainly not going to do it because of the president."

Follow President Donald Trump as he shapes America’s future!

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"The unelected Red Menace is all over the south pacific, too, and islanders are complaining to DC-they send in organized crime to open casinos but then buy off politicians and security-basically muscling in-last time this happened it was the Imperial…"
1 hour ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"I'm not normally in favour of the UN, but in this case, they have completed something positive for both British interests, as well as those of the Chagossians...🇮🇴....The treacherous Starmer regime has been ordered by the UN, to back down on that…"
7 hours ago
Drekx Omega commented on Drekx Omega's blog post One Rebel Star Should Fall From The EU Flag's Circular Constellation and Rise Anew With Greater and Brighter Light
"I'm not normally in favour of the UN, but in this case, they have completed something positive for both British interests, as well as those of the Chagossians...🇮🇴....The treacherous Starmer regime has been ordered by the UN, to back down on that…"
7 hours ago
Edward posted a status
Arrest...................
10 hours ago
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"That sounds like a good vid"
21 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"I really enjoy Gregg Braden's lectures....and wanted to share this with AC.....He uses logic, reason and intuition, all at once...Something I also seek to cultivate in my own approach to solving ancient mysteries...when I'm not gleaning direct…"
yesterday
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"here's a site AC members may also like
https://unherd.com/"
yesterday
AlternateEarth left a comment on Comment Wall
"There are more Europeans in the Princeton area, it seems, always been because of the university but now I think they're refugees from the rapists and murderers"
yesterday
More…