First, I must say that if one does not demystify something here, he might get nowhere. It is so unfortunate that physicists used the word 'dark matter' or 'dark energy' to qualify the phenomena they could not explain using the orthodox theories of gravity. First and foremost, these words are just mathematical abrakadabras. A sort of magical words that when stated, the equations of general relativity becames miraculously correct even though few minutes ago, they were dead incorect! These words are infact presently unanswerable questions that are packaged and sold out as answeres. When a cosmologist say that a galaxy is held together by dark matter, he is just being too proud to say that a galaxy is held together by something we don't know doing we don't know what and we don't know why. It is a roundabout way of saying we don't understand the universe.Now, to many people, the question is nolonger whether physicist have acknowledged spirits and unseen worlds. The question is whether they are on God's side or the Devil's side! So in these times, when the physically ignorant magicians are spreading rumours that physicists are colaborating with demons to open bottomless pits, it is prudent for physicists to avoid using to word 'dark' to imply what they are not seeing and/or what they don't understand. We see that we have dark matter, dark hallow, dark flow, dark energy,...,. As long as we use the word 'dark' we are still squarely in intellectual dark ages!Had physicists talked of 'unseen light' or 'invisible energy', the spiritualists could have quickly hailed it as a confirmation of their long held beleifs and wishes! But they mean the same thing! If we donnot see God and he is creeping around at night, then he will look dark to us! As long as God is invisible, he behaves, for all relevant purposes like a dark being! Or in short, in physics, we have absolutely no use of METAPHORS. In physics, we call a spade a spade. Metaphors belong solely in a poetry class.So throwing aside superstitions surrounding the word 'dark' and even sometimes 'matter', let us now reason clearly; are physicists at long last acknowledging the reality of unseen worlds? But one thing for sure is that a physicist won't call it Jesus, Yahweh, Buddha, Kundalini, Love and the like. People are so much entangled with semantic that the concepts slip by. But sharp people can always spot the same same snake oil packed in different bottles, branded with different names and advertised for us as different things. If you ask an 'materialistic' physicist if it is possible for a Jesus to get a cross a wall in any way, he will shake his head thoroughly. He will swear that he doesn't tolerate magical thinking and superstitions. But let us see, let us switch gears a bit; is it possible for weakly interacting massive particles to penetrate the wall? The answer he gives is a resounding yes!Ok it is simple traditionally, the spiritual world is defined as that which can never be ditected using the five common senses. Traditionally, it never meant that which cannot be infered using reasoning. The latter definition is plain stupid. We know that if you wake up one day and find plates spoons and brooms floating around your house like some flying witches, you can infer using reasoning that there are invisible things exerting a causal impact in your house. So a good definition of 'spirit' is a word that resorts to that which cannot be DIRECTLY perceived (perceived with common senses). There is no such an antagonism as spirit vs matter as some think. When we say 'matter', we don't insinuate that we know much about matter apart from that we can detect it. If it is a spirit, (whatever 'spirit' should mean here) somehow apearing to us, then that is not the important point in coining 'spirit' vs 'matter'. The dicotomy is strictly between the seen and the unseen. We are not here interested with what things ACTUALY are. The latter question is not meaningfull!In explaining how a thing should elude common senses, we must consider all of them:1.)Seeing2.)Touching3.)Testing4.)Smelling5.)HearingFortunately, and remarkably, all of them are related. All the 3 happen when the atoms of the thing we are perceiving interacts with the electromagnetic field in space. Therefore when a thing eludes electromagnetic field, it neatly eludes all the 5 possibilities in a single blow. This elegance makes it possible for a physicist to understand how a world can be entirely unperceivable to us. Dark matter, understood as weakly interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs)does that precisely. It interacts weakly with electromagnetic forces.To illustrate how this comes about, I like using the example of how a thing eludes the sense of touching. It does so by simply passing through your body like water sipping through the soil! As matter is infact mostly empty, what prevents two things from filling the same space is not what we conceive it as 'solidity'. It is the electromagnetic repulsive force between their atoms. But how a thing can elude electromagnetic forces is quite easy to appreciate. A piece of glass already eludes the magnetism excellently. In subatomic world, neutrinos, bein neutral are a good example of things that can pass through walls as if they don't exist! It requires a several light years thick lead to stop neutrinos!The solidity is very canning. Like inertia, we tend to think that 'hardness' is some inherent characteristic of matter. We then in turn think that a hard thing has more matter compressed within a region of space. But to illustrate that this thinking is problematic, we donnot even need to invork quantum mechanics. Just consider water. Ice is less dense than water! Strange enough, the water becomes harder by EXPANDING and not CONTRACTING. So hardness has nothing to do with more matter within a region (density). So it makes sense to say that hardness is not an inherent property of matter. Hardness is not the property of matter. It is not what matter IS. It is what it DOES. It is the BEHAVIOUR of matter. The behaviour is that of bullying and fighting things that are trying to cross its juridictions. Existing is the only inherent property of things. The rest arise when they interact with themselves.A question remain as to whether dark matter can interact with memselves and form a world of their own that might even include leaving things. If yes, then perharps what we thought as angels, demons, gods, souls etc are infact beings of such realms! To hint at an answere, let us reason if they have their own form of electromagnetism. As we have seen, it is the electromagnetic repulsion that forbids things from clamping in the same place. Without which, gravitating objects will become dens without limit. But since the mass of dark atter can affect ours, we can infer that they must have their own magnetism. Failure to have it, adding the fact that they form over 90% of the universe, they will quickly accumulate in places with no limit in density, turning all the universe to blackholes!
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Comments

  • Thanks for your comment, FW.:)
  • Thanks alot, green. I will elaborate on this free energy in space in another blog.
  • 8115334667?profile=original

  • I do agree with your comments and point of views on Dark Matter and Antimatter as well as Matter.... Dr. Keshe has explained and proved this to all the Universities around the world as the solutions are proven and providing free and clean energy for the world.  One cubic centimeter has enough energy to sustain man's needs for energy. That includes electrical appliances, automobiles, planes, everything that requires energy to operate.  But Dr. Keshe is criticized, and ignored by mainstream science while politics and economics gets in the way.  Just waiting for the day when people will demand for change in all level of society and politics first. As for your article you are right when terminologies are created like Dark Matter and Antimatter has no tangible understanding of the workings of the Universe simply because Man is not there yet to fully understand for the time being, but we just need to keep pushing on and continue with an "open mind"

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (956)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Edward posted a status
Weekend~~!!!
Have a nice weekend...
Always..thank you for the good informations and datas..
Take care..
See you later...^^
- Edward Paul Lee
1 hour ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Totally agree with your sentiments anent Vivek Ramaswamy, fellas....He'll be a good insert into the Trump admin, at some stage..

Now, I'll place this useful X22 interview, held a few days ago, which does give a good summary by a Bob Kudla, on some…"
4 hours ago
Justin89636 replied to Justin89636's discussion Anything UFO Or ET Related
"Article from a year ago. Vivek Ramaswamy who will be working with Trump during his next term is on board for UFO and ET disclosure. http://www.newsnationnow.com/space/ufo/ramaswamy-supports-full-ufo-..."
6 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"Good article about Vivek and ET disclosure. I'm gonna put that in my UFO and ET page."
6 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"I've been saying that if it does not happen during the end of Trumps term it will be set up so that the next administration which will be somebody who is a patriot like Trump will get everything going in the beginning of their term. I say by…"
6 hours ago
RandyFirstContact left a comment on Comment Wall
"Yes Justin, I do think the next four years will be the best chance we have had at formal disclosure, especially with patriots like Vivek Ramaswamy on Trump's team pushing for this issue.…"
6 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
"I get the feeling we will get disclosure in the next few years probably near the end of Trumps term since we still got to clean up and get rid of the Deep State Cabal and the mess they have created, but we are almost there."
6 hours ago
Drekx Omega left a comment on Comment Wall
"Darth, We live in a technological era in which it is easier to fake UAPs, using drones, or CGI and laser hologram projections, etc..I would say that most UAP sightings are fakes.
HOWEVER, in previous eras, say for example, the 1950s, UAPs/UFOs were…"
6 hours ago
More…