You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Latest Activity
"Well the inner Earth is Agartha, so if it wasn’t Agartha then it sounds like possible fakes.. Have you got the pics?"
"I saw another set of photos from the late 19th century that claimed ti be inside the Earth-not Argartha but a dark place with strange looking humans-the flora and fauna were strange, too. There were dozens of pics that looked genuine, but they were…"
"I believe that there were giants but some of those pics must be photoshopped"
"Having pituitary gigantism couldn’t have been easy, especially considering it causes so many ailments. It makes you appreciate the importance of proportion.. I think I’ll stick to being 5’5!"
"The human race on Earth was once tall and massive, in proportionate scale, so as to exist among animals, of similarly large proportion and stature..the so-called mega fauna of the Pleistocene epoch...Nature, or shall we correct that word and suggest…"
"AE, It’s definitely an unusual look and they seem much taller than any human giants you see nowadays. I think they’re humans with pituitary gigantism? They probably spent years scouting the globe for the most extreme cases and rounded them all up to…"
"Yes, in very ancient humans on Earth, being 8-foot tall, plus, was normal and of course, these individuals are rare, now, but worldwide genetic throwbacks, which, as suggested in the video, were once permitted in freak shows, as with all anomalies…"
Comments
I have also begun considering arcane means of isomerizing bio chemicals. When you see me do this, getta know that it is akin to a goalkeeper comming to the field to score lol! It means that our 'foward men' are realy doing poor job!
I agree that that we need to explore the ways that mind interacts with matter.. I also noticed how you do your logic as a kind of math. I use a system from Max Black where I use diagrams and circles.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy/article/critical...
Now lets come back to the atheist. He says that he has no need to disprove the existence of God and that it is the one who makes the claim who should make the prove. True! However, if given arguments for god, he rejects them based ultimately on absence of 'God' in science books! So he denies the 'proof' cause God is unfalsifiable but demands the proof even if he cannot falsify 'God'!
For instance, to explain the null results of some of his experiments in telepathy, Rubert Sheldrake said that the presence of skeptics affects the results! Our atheistic mindset scientist immediately throws such claims to the folder of 'pseudoscience' when the proponent suggest even a single ad oc. However, when General Relativity failed to correctly predict the dynamics of galaxies, Einsteinian fanatics were at ease with their claim that some unseen fairy tooth as 'dark matter' affected the results!
Why should dark matter ad oc warrant further investigation but not the claim that our beleifs affect the universe? Because the latter suggest a mind working in the fundamental forces of nature. It is realy not because the latter makes the theory unfalsifiable as they pretend. Our atheistic scientists judges the ad oc with their mechanical view of the world of which beleifs affecting molecules are deamed nonsense without proper investigation. It is this beleif (in ubsence of mind from fundamental interactions) though that we are trying to question by conducting a psi experiment and atheist cannot be allowed to use it as a platform to declare by fiat what is a 'sensiblee' and what is 'nonsensible' ad oc. When viewed from atheistic viewfinder, Sheldrake ad oc looks nonsense. However when viewed from spiritual viewfinder, it fits perfectly the world view Shaldrake is trying to prove by proving telepathy: can mind interact with matter, in ways not anticipated by mainstream science?