Ice Age of the Heart - Part 2
This is a series of questions and answers from William LePar's spiritual source, The Council, based on the previous posting where The Council described our world today existing in an Ice Age of the Heart.
Questioner: Why would a person choose not to love?
The Council: That befuddles us. We should be asking man or mankind why he chooses not to love. The reasons are as numbered as there are individuals. There is no real answer to that question other than selfishness which then creates loneliness which then creates desolation of the soul. Does that answer the question?
Questioner: Yes. Now it is a conscious choice, right?
The Council: Well, whenever one does something unloving, it is a conscious choice at one level or another or at many levels. Some people are nasty, being so, fully conscious. Others are nasty because there are underpinnings that surface in the conscious mind that make them react unkindly or unlovingly towards a given situation. And that occurs because they have not put in those things that raise the spirit. Do you understand?
Questioner: Yes, thank you.
Questioner: You said that we didn't put in the things that helped the spirit. Are you saying like garbage in, garbage out?
The Council: Very accurate. Very accurate. You can only be, you can only reach, you can only see what you have put into yourself. Do you understand that?
Questioner: Yeah, but even then we are still quite capable of blocking that, even all the good that comes in?
The Council: Put enough of it in, and you will succeed. If you think that you can put so much in and you still do things that should not be done, then you have not put enough goodness in. You have not pushed yourself enough. You have not eaten of the banquet set before you. You have chosen to eat artificial food that looks as good as the banquet, but gives no sustenance to the soul. Does that answer the question?
Questioner: Yes, but kind of brings up another one. You were talking about the heart and how cold we are with the heart. OK, so if we want to change, how do we develop good attitudes to start opening up our heart?
The Council: Take advantage of what is around you. If someone loves you, return that love and more, in any way that is necessary. Seek out to make your partner happy. Seek out to make your mate happy. Seek out to make your family happy.
For more on William LePar and The Council visit www.WilliamLePar.com
You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Latest Activity
"Yes Both dictators had the same nickname except for Napolean it was more affectionate because he would stay close to his men on the battlefield. Hitler was a runner during WW 1, as you know underground comm lines were blown up and soldiers had to…"
"As for the little corporal Adolf, I believe that Napoleon was also described as such, by his men..."Le Petit Caporal" and especially after the Battle of Lodi, 1796..."
"Queen Catherine de' Medici did offer and provide Michel with her personal protection, being her court astrologer, in effect, yet the risk was still there and why he used codes, in his works...So that's incorrect...and court politics can change a…"
"Nostradamus was not afraid to be taken to an inquisitrion investigation, Catherine de' Medici, the Queen of France (wife of King Henry II), was the royal supporter who protected and admired Nostradamus. She summoned him to Paris in 1555–1556 to draw…"
"Don't ya just love it, when supposed mythology, becomes proven fact....🇮🇳Rama Setu & Dwarka........Yes, they're all real and sometimes assumed fiction, can become discovered fact........The Indian people knew it, in spite of their government…"
"Only a scurrilous scallywag, such as Kier Starmer, would seek to appeal such a just and needed legal verdict, that supports the apt rights of Chagossians........I say, bravo to the ruling....Rule Britannia.....!!🇬🇧🫲🏿🇮🇴🫱🏿🇺🇸…"
"The latest news on the ongoing (light--dark) tug-of-war over Chagos, is great news and will make comrade Xi Jinping, cough on his chop suey flavoured cornflakes...This means the case for British retention of the territories, safeguarding ownership…"
Comments