Omnipresence

In the blog 'Space Of Colors And Illusory Distance', I stopped at suggesting that nature recognises the color of something as an analogy to a direction of something and then the brightness of the thing as an analogy to a distance from point zero, which can be taken as the center of the universe. We can then form another idea of space wherein if two things vibrates with the same frequency and with the same amplitude, then they appear to be on the same place in this other 'space of colors' no matter how far they are in the usual 'space of geometry'!We can still form another idea of omnipresence by suggesting that nature recognises certain 'things' and not 'places'. This idea is similar to Leibniz's idea that the location of a thing is that thing's own intrinsic property and not realy an extrinsic property. A thing moves by simply changing its intrinsic property that determines where it is or it appears to be in.Let us begine by considering a problem that philosophers of mind term it as 'the binding problem'. When you are staring at say a tree, we know that the image of a tree appears in one's retina. However, from there, signals from various portions of the image disperses to various regions of the head. The signals in the head is not at all recognisable as to belong to the tree. The parts of the tree appears completely seperate as seen from without the brain and yet in the awareness of the one experiencing it, the tree is one and it is intact! This present the problem in understanding the mind which we term it as the 'binding problem'.My suggestion to the solution to binding problems involves changing how the mainstream science understand the universe itself! This is we understand the universe as nonlocal or rather simply, holographic. But I will explain it in details. The mind does not deal with PLACES in the brain. It deals with 'VIBRATORY SIGNATURES' of chemicals. We know that the fruit y lies adjacent to leaf x in. This information of nearness is retained in the retina, yes. However, when the signals disperse to the brain via optic nerve, the nearness information is nolonger coded in the geometric adjacence. It is now coded in something akin to 'vibratory adjacence'. The mind interprates the leaf x as to be near to fruit y not because they are geometrically near each other but because the 'vibrate in the same way'!But I wish to explain this 'vibration coding' farther. It is a cosmic thing and it happens to be harnessed in our brains because our brains inherits the cosmos. In cosmos is a brain 'dreaming' of this reality. We perceive this reality because our brains is a portion of this 'cosmic brain'. Lets say that there are particles in the 'cosmic brain' termed as 'particles of locations'. As usual, in all quantum particles as explained by Paul Dirac, there are 4 aspects of each of those particles. Each of those aspects can be seen as a quantum field on its own (that pervades everywhere). Call thes 4 aspects w1,w2,w3 and w4 respectively. w1etc then is a field that describes countless particles. Every other particle, such as an electron, also has 4 aspects. Call them e1,e2,e3,e4 respectively. When e1, is entangled with a certain unique particle say in the w1 field, the electron appears to be in a unique location along x axis. The uniqueness of this position is determined by the uniqueness of the particle in w1 When e1, is entangled with a unique particle in w2, the electron appears to be at a unique location along y axis and so on. Hope you can get the idea. These 4 aspects of particles helps the 'cosmic mind' to form a 4d grid system that would appear to us as things located in the 4d spacetime when infact such might not be how they are located 'in reality' (remember the binding problem)This idea gets close to explaining the monolocality of things that we observe by linking it to the 'no polygamy' law of quantum entanglements. Particles appear to be wherever they appear to be because at wavefunction collaps, they rather get quantum entangled to 'that location' before then, they are somewhat omniprecent. If two electrons themselves are quantum entangled, then they are always so only before the collaps of wavefunction. At the collaps of wave function marks a disentanglement with other particles. This is necesary in order for particles to be entangled with 'locations' making it consistent with the 'no polygamy' law of quantum entanglements.With this idea, we can understand very well how death can be just an illusion in the cosmic brain or rather an entry to another realm. Even dieing in a nuclear explosion just makes the wavicles (signals) that forms your body to disperse just in a way similar to how the signal of a tree in your retina disperse to various parts of your brain. Well, the image of the tree apparently disappears but it is there in the mind. Similarly, dieing is just as perceived by our brains. To the cosmic brain, you enter another order.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!

Join Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community

Blog Topics by Tags

  • - (955)

Monthly Archives

Latest Activity

Love & Joy posted a discussion
   Welcome to The Other Side ...May all fear be erased, starting tonight with the lunar eclipse, which will be visible here in Europe but even more in the Americas!...In deep GRATITUDE for our Divine Soul Connexion which allows us to act as ONE even…
1 hour ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Music for your soul.
16 hours ago
Edward posted a status
** Info (knowing)...!!!
16 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Music for your soul.
16 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Music for your soul.
"Steve Jablonsky makes some powerful music scores that's for sure. https://youtu.be/yT7P-3UBp5o?si=P04qrvcfAUiu6hhz"
16 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
20 hours ago
Justin89636 left a comment on Comment Wall
20 hours ago
AlternateEarth commented on AlternateEarth's blog post Tau Ceti Bear Pilot Morphs His Craft Into A Drone!
"Thanks guys-"
yesterday
More…