First of all…..Dear Faith many apologies for comments that were displayed off topic on your discussion, and as such, if you wish, I will also remove my replies to Drekx as well.
A Brief History of Miracles. . .How you feel about Obama (or anything else) could be revealing something to you! OR Jason's Stroke of INSIGHT! >>>Posted by faith on May 20, 2013 at 1:07pm in Spirituality In General Read more: http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/forum/topics/a-brief-history-of-miracles-relating-to-the-obama-energy#ixzz2U7mzyRwh
Drekx…..Reference to ‘technical’ data
The Information that was presented in this instance Drekx, was the scientific break down of what you were actually implying in the description that you originally presented and used as a basis for your info, and as I have a good scientific mind, understood that ‘relevant’ information, and presented to others, and to you, that I knew where you were coming from and understood that scientific knowledge source. I did not say any more than that, except for asking you to clarify a small part of your information, as it was not correct.
Unfortunately the vast majority of people are not so scientifically minded, thus any tech/science info presented by anyone, even simply put, most will only have perhaps a vague understand, some would not ever understand it.
“attempting to draw me into conflict over the technical issues...” There was no ‘conflict’ Drekx, only that which you yourself perceived.
“And if you had not attempted to blacken my name, none of this would have happened to you”
Drekx….I did not attempt to blacken your name at all. Where have you pulled that notion from?
What is the point of that…it serves no purpose; You went off on one, citing a ‘witch hunt’….. I can hardly be held responsible for that.
Taken out of context again
Hi Stick...Yes
The silence is deafening…..clearly a response is unlikely to occur,
And that was what my comment was actually referring to Drekx.
You said that your information was your own words this is indeed so, but from perhaps the same source?
Drekx’s comment: “In contrast, all of my wording is my own...and if you try to discover a source other than me, you won't..”.
So by citing this source, http://www.minimagnetosphere.org/downloads/pdfs/1Bamford.pdf you have actually brought to the fore and highlighted your own information as well, (albeit in a slightly different spin with less involved technical data) as it is the same/similar science source. That is why you are so readily able to refer to it as I was.
Drekx this was your info…..
To put it simply, this curved hull allows an even flow of ionsized plasma across the surface, from the beam emitter at the top, which emits positrons (positive electrons) down to the implosion reactor motors at the bottom, which absorb the electrons.....which are made negatively charged...
A smooth rounded hull allows for a more effective and even flow of electrons from the north to south poles....In the centre of all such ships, there is a dipole conductor which extends through the centre and joins the beam emitter to the motors..
This basic design uses aetheric energies to firstly activate the field, once off ground and not grounded....then with the field in proper flow, an electro-gravitic "bubble" is created around the ship, so that it may utilise it's own gravitational field....much as a "mini-planet"....and electro-magnetic and gravitaional pull of it's own...which is direcional...and gravity is directed, pulling space-time, or folding space-time, in such a manner as to travel from point A to point B, by gravitically folding the spacial distance...
All atmospheric beam ships are designed to work in 3rd density, and can change densities when required....so transit inter-dimensionally, from the lowest three aethers of solid, liquid and gas...to the higher and finer states of the aetheric, plasma and even higher....BUT, these ships allow a PHYSICAL deployment when needed....and that is their role in the First Contact programme...
So in summary, in order to effectively generate the desired gravitational effects, through 360 degrees of spherical arc, the described ionised electro-magnetic plasma field must have an even depth and free flow of moving electrons, which would be thwarted by sharp or angular corners, over which the electrons are required to flow...Thus we use rounded hulls in varying designs, which all adhere to this principle...
Hope this explains in a manner that dovetails, where possible, with a conventional understanding of physics...
Comment by Drekx Omega
And thankyou dear friends for your interest in these subjects...One day knowledge anent this technology will be commonplace and very much part of our new culture, within the Solaris star nation and greater GFL...
This was the info which was presented….
Drekx with reference to your statement:
This is effectively what you are implying:
The shielding concept of a dipole-like magnetic field and plasma, surrounding a spacecraft forming a “mini magnetosphere” the determined effectiveness of a magnetized plasma barrier to be able to expel an impacting, low beta, supersonic flowing energetic plasma representing the ‘aetheric energies’ . Optical and ionised plasma, plasma density, the plasma flow velocity, and the intensity of the dipole field show the creation of a narrow transport barrier region and diamagnetic cavity virtually devoid of energetic plasma particles. This demonstrates the potential viability of being able to create a small “hole” in the (‘aetheric energies’ ) plasma, of the order of the ion width, in which an inhabited spacecraft could reside in relative safety.
The interaction of flowing plasma with a dipole magnetic field: measuremental, diamagnetic cavity relevant to spacecraft protection. It is quantitatively, compared to a 3D particle-in-cell ‘hybrid’ code stimulation, which uses kinetic ions and fluid electrons, showing excellent quantitative agreement. Together, demonstrate the pivotal role of particle kinetics in determining generic plasma transport barriers.
A major issue and safety standpoint for bio-manned spacecraft is of greatest concern are the energetic heavy particles of which ~90% are protons, 9% are alphas, with electrons making up the majority of the remaining mass. Low-Earth-Orbit at approximately 300km altitude, this close to the Earth, the atmosphere is still significantly dense, the potentially lethal damage to biological tissue from exposure to radiation in space arising, for example, from the ‘ ionised wind’ or ‘aetheric energies’ plasma. The ‘ionised wind’ consists of plasma characterised by low densities, moderate temperatures and fast/supersonic directed flows; the actual plasma wind output is highly variable on time scales of milliseconds upwards due to the localised and turbulent origins of the energetic plasma from the surface area, the magnetic field is carried with the out flowing plasma thus attenuate much of the particle flux.
There is the additional protection created by the ‘inner magnetosphere’. This is the magnetised plasma structure created as a consequence of the magnetic dipole field as it extends out. Since there is an need for the viability of creating artificial magnetosphere structures to provide local protection of spacecraft instrumentation and ‘astronauts’ but these require an impractically large power supply and assemblies to create the necessary field strengths.
Essentially single particles approaches the necessary magnitude of the protecting field rather than considering collective plasma effects that might be expected to dominate on the plasma-dipole field interaction suggests that more modest field strengths indeed are more effective at creating diamagnetic-like cavities (regions in which energetic ionised particles are essentially absent) that have the potential for spacecraft shielding.
A magnetised flowing plasma beam is incident upon a dipole magnetic field structure, seeking to simulate such field structures on incident ‘ionised wind’ particles, which outlines the mechanics of the apparatus, spatially resolved measurements of the principal plasma parameters from the kinetic stimulation used on spacecraft protection systems. Analogues to the ionised plasma wind, spacecraft interaction system are of relevance to the plasmas, similar to those using ‘mini-magnetosphere’ like structures as a means of aiding spacecraft propulsion.
The ‘Light’ plasma confinement device, a modified version used for plasma–neutral interactions and relevant diverters. The plasma in this system consists of a supersonic plasma beam including the dipole magnetic field source and the location with peak densities and temperatures in the range 1017-1019 and 5-7eV respectively the principal components of the device configured for the temperature range.
The ‘vacuum vessel’, constructed of non-magnetic, is cylindrical with length and of diameter in respect of the device and is pumped by diffusion pumps that are isolated by gate ‘valves’ and located at each end of the device. The field ‘coils’ and is connected in series with a single return conductor to cancel the error field, that is the maximum field at the center of the ‘machine’, this light field’ represents the ‘mini interplanetary’ magnetic field. The ‘ vacuum vessel’ is divided by a diaphragm containing a small orifice (14mm diameter) to separate off the “target chamber” in which an increased pressure, corresponding to neutral densities can be maintained, enhancing visible ‘light’ emission and enabling better use of fast or incremental ‘power’. The plasma source is a development of a modified “duo-plasma” source.
Two dipole field sources are used, a permanent, cylindrical magnet (with a strong field strength at the pole) mounted on a probe manipulator which allowed it to be moved to various axial positions along the target chamber. The second magnet source is a pulsed system formed from a 20 turn solenoid with a maximum current, mounted on reciprocating probe holders so as to minimise the deleterious effects of probe heating by the plasma beam, allow the acquisition of radial profiles (with a spatial resolution) of electron density and temperature at various positions within the target and upstream chambers. As it is obtained in a few tens of seconds, over which time any variation in plasma source output is minimised.
By a combination of the radial scanning of the probe system and moving the axial position of the dipole field source, it is possible to obtain plasma parameters around the plasma- dipole field interaction region. The ‘visible light’ of the plasma beam interacting with the permanent dipole magnet and visible light emission (predominantly originates from interaction of the plasma with the background neutrality) corresponds to regions of higher plasma density, and the plasma beam is deflected in an apparently stable narrow layer around the magnet casing. This source produces a dipole field structure but at significantly stronger field strengths allowed the dynamics of the interaction to be utilised.
Upstream plasma beam characteristics, the interaction of the plasma beam with the static dipole field. (i.e. in a region sufficiently distant from the region in which the dipole field dominates) electron density and temperature respectively. In the absence of the downstream dipole field structure, it would be expected that this plasma would propagate along the solenoidal confining field until it encountered the end target chamber, with no reductions in the peak density or temperature occurring over the characteristic axial scale lengths or beam width, remaining constant along the whole length of the target chamber
Typically the plasmas produced are supersonic and in the absence of any direct ion energy, this ‘directly’ flows from the relative magnitudes of the floating and plasma potentials. Defining the sheath coefficient in the usual way, in terms of the ‘floating potential’ and a ‘plasma expression’ are due to plasma with an isotropic velocity distribution, subsonic ion flow and no secondary emission.
Also….Drekx Please clarify this following statement as this is not correct.
***with the field in proper flow, an electro-gravitic "bubble" is created around the ship, so that it may utilise its own gravitational field....much as a "mini-planet"....and electro-magnetic and gravitaional pull of its own...which is direcional...and gravity is directed, pulling space-time, or folding space-time, in such a manner as to travel from point A to point B, by gravitically folding the spacial distance...***
This highlighted part in the above statement by Drekx cannot be easily explained neither by using the sourced info nor the alternatives displayed as it much more complex process and very highly technically. But it is certainly not utilised in this manner.
Comments