You need to be a member of Ashtar Command - Spiritual Community to add comments!
Latest Activity
A Season Of Romance By Emmanuel Dagher ...Dearest friend, A Deeper Connection The energies coming in at this time are giving us the opportunity to strengthen our connection to the Universe, and the Source of all life itself. What will this…
It's Time To Accept Your Truth - You Are One With Your Inner Light - By Josephine Edge WHEN YOU FINALLY ACCEPTED 100% THE TRUTH, THAT YOU ARE AT ONE WITH YOUR DIVINE INNER LIGHT…...Then a big shift occurs within you. You achieve atonement, which…
"More talk of Bird Flu and WW3. The Deep State desperation is out in full force. They want another scamdemic and WW3 in the worst way. https://rumble.com/v5t3p08-ep.-3509b-rats-running-trump-is-in-the-p..."
"Who said anything about the Media scaring anybody lol. My job is to expose the fake news not be scared of it Darth Vindex. The only people who are scared are the ones who believe everything the Mainstream Media tells them and can't think for…"
"I don´t know blemmy what is going on here. The first thing I see on the picture looks like 750 p CGI."
"In my fiction CIA operatives are described as more human like characters who have learned to grasp reality and understand that they are actually not in control of things. This puts them into situations where they have to work together. Most of the…"
"Hi Agarther Z. Everyone seems to be doing mostly ok and deciding not to let the media control their emotions and thoughts with fear themed propaganda. I will be sharing a lot of news coverage including coverage discussing typhoons, conflicts, new…"
Comments
(t/T)^2=1-(v/c)^2
This is a pythagorean relationship as in
(cosA)^2=1-(sinA)^2
so provided that we let v/c=sinA, we will have t/T=cosA
So does this suggest that t 'axis' is at an angle A from T?? Well, it is so only when we think that v/c=sinA necesarily mean that v is moving along an axis at an angle A from the axis of c of which we know that clearly this is not the case.
Merely spoting a mathematical symmetry does not mean that there is any reality underlieing it. Physicists used to know this very well and there are myriads of such amazing symmetries in mathematics. I can show that a one octave higher wave is 'perpendicular' to the lower wave. This is called HILBERT SPACE and I can show that the peculiar relativistic relationship above stems from the same waving since a particle moving with v is realy a wave.
Even Einstein first rejected the idea as superfluous. He was correct, but he neaded Minkowski insight in generalising relativity. But this is just MATHEMATICALY not in conceptual sense.
Time dillation reads: t/T=B, This suggest that we measure speed using T and not using t. we say x/t=(x/T)x(T/t)=x/TB. Once we have done this, we have a set of FOUR, not THREE ratios. These are:
i)t/T
ii)x/T
iii)y/T
iv)z/T
We have what mathematically looks like something moving in a 4 dimensional spacetime. But then t/T is not realy a speed. It is a time dillation. This is the first insight in understanding Minkowski spacetime. The second insight is comming.
A merger of space and time, even in principle is problematic for some reasons. It necesarily put some regions, such as andromeda, millions of years 'away' hence it is imposible to reach there without spending a million years. But if we think clearly, this impossibility is only in practise not in PRINCIPLE. If we had another signal moving faster than light, then spacetime interval btwn here andromeda would be smaller, without the space interval necesarily reducing. Judge this from s^2=x^2 y^2 z^2-(ct)^2. The spacetime interval, s, tends to zero as ct, hypotenuse distance tends to equal x^2 y^2 z^2. If there is no limit as to how fast a signal can cross the cosmos, then there is no need to think that 's' reflects the true nature of space and time. It is only so as an EMERGENT phenomenon due to bridging gaps using light signals. it has been shown in quantum mechanics that IN PRINCIPLE, there is no limit as to how fast a signal can get across. So relativity is nolonger a fundamental picture of reality. It is an emergent phenomenon and we must treat such equations as just a mathematical setting.
I´m not merging space and time......I´m merging the relative and the bigger perspective...
s2=x2 y2 z2-(ct)2
s=spacetime. But this is a mathematical relationship, not a CONCEPTUAL. Donnot try to form an idea of a merger between space and time in your head, you will spoil your brain. To understand spacetime, simply take math. It has no nonmathematical meaning.
No space either.??..I´d say that from the bigger perspective it is all here now......; but, from a personal daily life view it is convenient to use the concepts of space and time. I think the trick is to jump back and forth between the two until they somehow merge and become one. The same way we can think how things are one and many simultaneously....or any of these sets of opposites that exist simultaneously depending whether we look at the large or small picture...