Apparently there´s a lots of people who believe in the existence of the Constellation of the Pleiades.
But as I keep looking at the Night Sky I realize better why this particfular Constellation appears to be not there, and so I can´t imagine anymore why anybody else should believe in it´s existence.
Apart from the crappy crap of Billy Meier, now considered one of the biggest liars of the 20th century (I wonder why he isn´t the President of the United States right now), there seems to me to be no one else who gave the Pleiades Constellation serious attention that´d be en par with the seriousness of the attention that this fellah gave that Constellation.
It was supposed to be located billions of light years away from Planet Earth, but seems to be located slightly above the Planet´s atmosphere, and thus slightly beyond the balloons often called the Sun and the Moon in the 20th century.
Observations of a few youtube videos that appear to demonstrate to me that those are some kind of light reflectors or holographic beam projectors, have confirmed to me that the Pleiades does not exist as a Constellation, and is thus mostly to be found in the flimpsy, flamsy writings of a few Astronomers. I have got a few Astronomy books myself and I love them so I am not trying to declare that those Astronomers are being idiots or anything. Do they want to believe in nonexistent things? So be it. I´ve gotten used to public talk about John Lennon and Dr. Phil, Marilyn Monroe and Britney Spears not existing as real persons but being the roles of actors. So why not the idea of the Constellations per ce not existing, but rather having been placed into Earth´s Orbit to monitor the planet? People began to paint these Constellations in caves a few hundred to few thousand to even reportedly a few dozens of thousands of years ago, and the outcome became one of the most stunning eras in human history and art history in general - but what was being painted? It was certainly not any Constellations since nobody got told in that time that it was.
And people knew then that it takes light billions of years to reach one planet from a star. Why should Earth be any more different? I agree that when you look at the night sky from a telescope you´ll see the stars, and countless suns, but you´ll not see for example the Pleiades you´re trying to look for. Because it isn´t there in my opinion. It thus follows only naturally that a few intelligent people ask where there is proof positive to substantiate claims of the existence of the Pleiades........and come back empty handed. I decided to hand signal to one of those Holographic projectors and noticed that some kind of UFO began to move in my direction and then disappeared back into the abyss where it came from. Do people get the big picture here? If I am right, the Pleiades is one of the most sold out hoaxes of all time.
Comments
Donald I consider mr. Meier to be a liar and mrs. Barbara to be someone who just wants it all to be there. You come to Earth from some other solar system, you´re coming from that solar system and thus not the supposed Constellation that solar system is supposed to be part of. Get it? Simple self - deception.
Feather those supposed ´Pleiades´images tell me nothing about the purported Pleiades reported by the Mainstream Media. My experience with observing Constellations has started to convince me that those are something else than Stars or Star Clusters. When I go out of a city and I take a peek into the Night Sky and I look beyond those objects I see Stars, but I´ve seen none so far that belong to the specific ´grouping´of Stars known officially as the Pleiades. I detect there to be 9 + stars rather than the 7 reported to form the basis construction of the apparently mythical Pleiades Constellation.
Amos 5:8. Job9:9; Job 38:31. Number 5 or 6 somewhere. It's got to be important the pyramids point to Alcyone the central star. The bible says it is the "throne of God"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiades
Billy Meier and Barbara Marciniack (Bringers of the Dawn, Earth, and other books), Barbara Hand Clow (The Pleiadian Agenda and Heart of the Christos and other books), Amorah Quan Yin (Pleiadian Tantric Workbook and others), Loa Shapiro (Comes the Awakening) and other authors and books are refer to the Pleiadians. But of course the Pleiades do not exist. Nor does Sirius. Nor does Orion. Nor does our sun. Nor does Gaia/Earth. Nor do you. We're all just holographic projects from other realms. So what else is new? But the Pleiades is just as real a projection as the earth or you are. Get used to it. Why deny the obvious? The Pleiadians are considered (perhaps along with the Sirians) to be our closest cousins. Why do you wish to eschew our soul families? Are you frightened of your larger galactic heritage? Denial is not a sane approach. It is the path for those who lack discernment and who prefer their own illusions. And you have every right to wallow in delusion, but please do not expect many others to follow along with you.
Well Philosocraptor you can but what you are looking at is not in my opinion a grouping of stars. What I see when I look at ´the Pleiades´now strikes me as being physically impossible as a grouping of stars.
Sickandtired ok.
I find it rather funny that people think that there is something they call ´the Pleiades´, because somebody else told them. You get shown a pattern of blobs in astronomy books you´re told is ´the Pleiades´. The case appears to be to me that when I look at this ´thingy´in the night sky, I am not looking at the objects that define ´the Pleiades´, but rather I am looking at the region in space that is called ´the Pleiades´by the mainstream media. People claim ´the Pleiades has been documented over and over again´. Exactly. Just like ´the Flat Earth´has been ´documented over and over again´until it reached youtube and became a series of youtube videos produced by a guy who calls himself The NASA Channel. That is what I think is the purpose behind the ´Pleiades´. It is to give people the appearance that there is a Pleiades to begin with. If you look at these objects, that people used to call stars, very few of them, if any, apart from a few very faint ones strike me as being stars, as the really faint objects appear to have no edges and thus fit the description of stars very well, although I am very well aware that a few of those objects are also planets. We live on a world we call the Earth, but it´s not the small world we´ve been told is the Earth - instead, it´s a Super - Earth! Super Earth are often lone wanderers that don´t belong to any solar system in particular and like all other planets they rely on their Inner Sun to heat themselves up. As I kept looking at one of those objects often called ´stars´I decided to wave to it and signal it in the suspicion that this was some kind of ancient light reflector. I saw an object that moved and looked like some kind of UFO as it began to get closer and closer. And it dawned to me that since it´d take starlight millions of years to reach Earth, that´s the truth about starlight - it takes it time to reach one place and then move from that place to another and go on and it never stops per ce. The mainstream media talks about starlight as if it´s overwhelmingly obsessed with the Earth per ce but that´s not true. It´s there all the time and all around us and has got nothing in my opinion to do with the formation of ´The Pleiades´.
Peace to you too!! And to the others here.
Roaring saying that ´everything existing in regions of stars that looks like a star IS a star is not saying anything about the nature of stars. Stars emit light and they share this light with each other, such as the Earth´s Inner Sun emitting light to other stars which in turn share it with each other. The Pleiades isn´t composed of stars to my knowledge. The immense distances between the stars become more clearly visible as you use better telescopes.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next